- Wednesday Aft - December 20, 2017

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Field strength:  Mean: 13 MP  Geomean: 6 MP
(based on 7 players, 5 non ACBL players ignored)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Chris Johnson - Dana Johnson 55.00 1st OA 0.66
Bobbie Boschan - Robert Boschan 53.75 2nd OA 0.50
Richard Cathcart - Robert Carrier 51.25 2nd OB 0.47
EVENT>49er Pairs               |SESSION>Wednesday Aft|SECTION> B
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>December 20, 2017  |CLUB NO.>131102    | 12/20/2017 16:40
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Tom Ciacio      |RATING>Club Championship (60%, 50%, 30% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   20.0 |TOP>   2 |MP LIMITS>50/25/8        |CLUB>Ventura Unit Bridge Club
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=6/B=5/C=3                       ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |      Overall    |           Section       |      |Final    |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Carol Marquez-Olson    Linda Forsyth            B   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     17.50  43.75
 2 Robert Boschan         Bobbie Boschan           A   2     .     .   |   2     .     .     21.50  53.75  0.50(OA)
 3 Chara Clark            Nancy Bejuene            C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     18.50  46.25
 4 Dana Johnson           Chris Johnson            B   1     1     .   |   1     1     .     22.00  55.00  0.66(OA)
 5 David Davis            Robert Newman            C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     20.00  50.00
 6 Robert Carrier         Richard Cathcart         C   .     2     .   |   .     2     1     20.50  51.25  0.47(OB)
                                          Totals                                            120.00

Hands and Results
1 ♠QT875
KJ4
643
♣63
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠A94
T98
K87
♣KQ92
♠3
AQ753
AT9
♣AT87
♠KJ62
62
QJ52
♣J54
6
1214
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣0 ♦3/2 ♥1 ♠6 NT1
EW: 7♣ 4 6 1♠ 6NT
LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: -1440 7♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        200    2.00   0.00  2 E +3   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
        430    1.00   1.00  3N W +1   B3-Clark-Bejuene vs B5-Davis-Newman
        450    0.00   2.00  4 E +1   B2-Boschan-Boschan vs B4-Johnson-Johnson

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 Pass1Pass
1NT1Pass2Pass
3Pass4All pass
  1. Semi-forcing

E/W should play 4 from the East hand at most tables. Once upon a time, there would be no question that the West hand would be a Game Force opposite an opening bid from their partner. However, if you have taken a more modern approach and open all 12 HCP hands, and many 11 HCP hands, then it is important to also adjust down a little bit what hands are a Game Force after an opening bid. With a 4333 hand, the West hand could certainly qualify as just an invitational bid, despite holding quality honor cards. The main lesson on this hand is that you should take into account your opening bid style when deciding how to evaluate hands such as the West hand. Whether West bids 2 to force game, or shows a three card invitational raise, East has the values to bid game. Most of the matchpoints will rest on South's lead. If South leads a , declarer will have no losers in that suit, and with both honors onside, will find themselves wrapping up all 13 tricks!!! On any other lead, declarer should only end up with 12 tricks, unless South falls asleep and fails to play a honor if declarer starts the suit from their hand. It turns out that declarer can make all 13 tricks in a contract on any lead, but E/W do not belong in s, as they don't have the values to even consider slam.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

2 ♠KQT52
KJ2
QT765
♣-
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠A9
6
AKJ93
♣QJT42
♠J43
A953
82
♣A975
♠876
QT874
4
♣K863
11
159
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 2♠  ♣3 ♦5 NT5
EW: 3♣ 2 2NT  ♥5 ♠5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  800          2.00   0.00  5* W -4  B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
  100          1.00   1.00  5♣ W -2   B3-Clark-Bejuene vs B5-Davis-Newman
        130    0.00   2.00  2♣ E +2   B2-Boschan-Boschan vs B4-Johnson-Johnson

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  PassPass
11DblPass
3Pass3Pass
3NTAll pass  

After West opens 1, North will usually overcall 1 and East can make a Negative Double . Some South players might raise to 2, although the hand is minimal, particularly at this vulnerability. If South passes, West should bid 3 and not just 2. At first, this might seem an overbid, as West does not have the normal values for a jump shift. However, when partner makes a Negative Double, particularly over a 1 bid from the opponents, you should make a jump rebid with a little less, as partner has already promised some values. A hand worth about 15-17 HCP is appropriate for a jump. Conversely, with a better hand than that, it isn't sufficient to make a jump shift, and you should cue bid the opponents suit to establish a Game Force . East has 9 HCP, which is close to a minimum for their Negative Double, so passing 3 would not be unreasonable. As already mentioned, a jump shift opposite a Negative Double does not show a game forcing hand, and in fact isn't forcing at all. If East does decide to bid again, 3 is out as that would be a non-forcing correction back to West's first suit. 3 is a less certain bid, as some would use that to show that the original Negative Double was based on a weakish hand with only s. So, that just leaves a 3 bid, and then a pass of West's 3NT bid.

As it happens, with the poor breaks in the minor suits, 3 might be a harder contract than 3NT. Against 3NT, North is unlikely to lead a , which would give declarer no chance to make. By the way, if you were to lead a from the North hand do you know which to lead? Against a NT contract, if you choose to lead from a three card holding containing two unconnected honors, it is usually right to lead the second (lower) of the two honors, in this case the Jack. Assume instead that North leads a high . Declarer can win the Ace and lead a high , getting the bad news in that suit. South can make things difficult by ducking the King twice, but if they take either of the first two finesses, declarer will be in control. Declarer can duck two rounds of s if South switches to that suit, and eventually lead a toward the Jack for their ninth trick. Ducking twice in the suit makes it much more difficult for declarer to keep their lines of communication open, but declarer might still prevail, depending on what they choose to do next. Anyone who makes 3NT will certainly get a very good score.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

3 ♠AQT65
KQ
K9754
♣7
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠KJ
T862
QT86
♣JT8
♠9873
A74
J32
♣K43
♠42
J953
A
♣AQ9652
14
78
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 4 4 5♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣2 ♦3 ♥3 ♠2 NT2
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +450 5♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  200          2.00   0.00  2♠ N +3   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
  130          1.00   1.00  2 N +2   B3-Clark-Bejuene vs B5-Davis-Newman
         50    0.00   2.00  3N N -1   B2-Boschan-Boschan vs B4-Johnson-Johnson

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   1
Pass1Pass2
Pass21Pass2
Pass3NTAll pass 
  1. Game forcing, saying nothing about s

I admit with a rebiddable six card suit, and sufficient defense, I would open the South hand without thinking too much about it, but some will certainly pass. Assuming South does open, it looks like N/S are headed to 3NT, most often declared by North. East will have no obvious lead against 3NT, and might choose any suit except a . If East leads a , declarer can win, play a towards North. West should play the King. If West play the Jack, declarer will be sure they have three tricks in the suit, but playing the King makes it unclear where the Jack is. Declarer might choose to duck the King, or win and play a . Communication between the two hands is tricky, but on the layout of the cards, declarer has several paths to nine tricks. They might end up taking four tricks, two tricks and three top minor suit tricks, or the defense might set up a long for declarer, or declarer might take the finesse at some point. All roads seem to lead to nine tricks and anyone who makes 10 tricks should have a well above average result. The nice layout in s insures that a contract will also play very well, though I don't think many will be playing s. If South doesn't open originally, 3NT still seems the most likely final contract, but it's possible that N/S will stop in a partscore in light of their misfit. This will not be a good result for N/S with all of their games making.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

4 ♠K97
T73
KT43
♣953
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠AQ4
AJ42
A65
♣K74
♠85
Q98
Q2
♣AQJT62
♠JT632
K65
J987
♣8
6
1811
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣1 ♦5 ♥1 ♠6 NT1
EW: 5/6♣ 1/2 5/6 1♠ 5/6NT
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -1440 6NT-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        620    2.00   0.00  5♣ E +1   B2-Boschan-Boschan vs B4-Johnson-Johnson
        630    1.00   1.00  3N W +1   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
        660    0.00   2.00  3N W +2   B3-Clark-Bejuene vs B5-Davis-Newman

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
1Pass21Pass
2NTPass3NTAll pass
  1. Limit raise or better in s

E/W should have no problem getting to 3NT on this hand. Regular readers of my analysis may recall that I recently suggested opening 1NT with a hand with 18 HCP and 4333 distribution (see Board 4 from 12/6/2017). Given that, it might seem odd that I don't also recommend that here. The principle difference is that the current West hand is full of Ace and Kings, and both of the queen/jack honor cards are paired with an Ace. The hand looks significantly better to me than the hand from 12/6. Indeed, if I go to http://www.jeff-goldsmith.org/cgi-bin/knr.cgi and put in the current hand, to get a more accurate evaluation of its' value, I get a value of 17.65. The "similar" 4333 18 HCP from 12/6 gave a value of 1.5 HCP less than this. The point to learn here is that even with the same distribution and same HCP, not all hands are created equal. Part of learning to be a better bridge player is learning better hand evaluation beyond just HCP and distribution. The most important facets of more advanced hand evaluation is understanding that Aces and Kings are a little better than their HCP indicates, and Queens and Jacks are a little worse, and also understanding the importance of honor "structure" (i.e. where honors are located relative to long suits and relative to each other.) A hand with A32 and Q32 in two suits is less valuable than a hand with AQ2 and 432 in those same suits. A hand with 65432 and AQ in two suits, is less valuable than a hand with AQ432 and 32 in those same two suits.

There won't be much to the play of this hand. If North is on lead and leads a , declarer can play the Queen and eventually play on the suit, ending up with 12 tricks. If East is declarer and South leads the Jack, declarer will certainly not end up with 12 tricks, and will do well to end up with even 11 tricks. Of course, North might pitch a on the run of the s which will help declarer out a lot. Top scores for E/W will go to those who get a from the North hand and then North pitches a on the run of the s, allowing declarer to make all 13 tricks.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

5 ♠AT86
KQ854
K63
♣8
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠J3
T3
A84
♣AKJT54
♠Q752
AJ9762
Q7
♣9
♠K94
-
JT952
♣Q7632
12
139
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 1♠  ♣6 ♥5 NT6/5
EW: 1♣ 2 1NT  ♦5 ♠6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -110 2-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  150          2.00   0.00  3♣ W -3   B2-Boschan-Boschan vs B4-Johnson-Johnson
  100          1.00   1.00  3N E -2   B3-Clark-Bejuene vs B5-Davis-Newman
        100    0.00   2.00  3 S -1   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
6 ♠AT9
K942
J974
♣86
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠62
AJT8
T
♣AQ9752
♠QJ873
53
AKQ
♣KJT
♠K54
Q76
86532
♣43
8
1116
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣1 ♦6/5 ♥4 ♠3 NT3
EW: 5♣ 1 3 4♠ 4NT
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: -630 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        130    2.00   0.00  3♣ W +1   B5-Davis-Newman vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
        620    1.00   1.00  5♣ W +1   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B2-Boschan-Boschan
        630    0.00   2.00  3N W +1   B3-Clark-Bejuene vs B4-Johnson-Johnson
7 ♠-
AQT63
K87
♣AT965
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠KQ32
97
A32
♣QJ82
♠A9
KJ52
JT96
♣K74
♠JT87654
84
Q54
♣3
13
1212
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1/- 1♠  ♣5 ♦5 ♥7/6 NT3
EW: 2♣ 3NT  ♦5 ♥5 ♠6
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: -600 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  800          2.00   0.00  3♣* W -3  B5-Davis-Newman vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
        100    1.00   1.00  3 N -1   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B2-Boschan-Boschan
        180    0.00   2.00  2N W +2   B3-Clark-Bejuene vs B4-Johnson-Johnson
8 ♠AQJ98
987
3
♣Q987
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠76
Q642
Q9764
♣K6
♠T54
J5
AKT
♣JT542
♠K32
AKT3
J852
♣A3
9
79
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 3 4♠ 3NT  ♦6
EW: 1  ♣5 ♥4 ♠3 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +420 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  110          1.50   0.50  2♠ S      B3-Clark-Bejuene vs B4-Johnson-Johnson
  110          1.50   0.50  2 S      B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B2-Boschan-Boschan
         50    0.00   2.00  4♠ N -1   B5-Davis-Newman vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
9 ♠A
T96532
AQ65
♣A9
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠T93
KJ
98
♣KQT852
♠KQ8652
Q84
K4
♣63
♠J74
A7
JT732
♣J74
14
910
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 3 1NT  ♣5 ♠4
EW: 2♣ 2♠  ♦3 ♥4 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  110          2.00   0.00  1 S +1   B3-Clark-Bejuene vs B4-Johnson-Johnson
        140    0.50   1.50  3♠ E      B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B2-Boschan-Boschan
        140    0.50   1.50  2♠ W +1   B5-Davis-Newman vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
10 ♠8
AT952
KQ98
♣J93
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠AKT43
J7
T74
♣865
♠Q5
KQ4
J653
♣QT72
♠J9762
863
A2
♣AK4
10
810
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 2/1 3 1♠ 1NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT6
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  140          2.00   0.00  3 N      B3-Clark-Bejuene vs B4-Johnson-Johnson
  110          1.00   1.00  2 S      B5-Davis-Newman vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
        100    0.00   2.00  2♠ S -1   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B2-Boschan-Boschan
11 ♠9
A7
J84
♣AKJ9654
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠KQ853
43
KQ9752
♣-
♠JT6
QT9865
6
♣T72
♠A742
KJ2
AT3
♣Q83
13
103
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 6♣ -/1 2 6NT  ♦6/7 ♠5
EW:  ♣0 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT1
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +990 6NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  490          2.00   0.00  3N S +3   B4-Johnson-Johnson vs B5-Davis-Newman
  150          0.50   1.50  3♣ S +2   B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B2-Boschan-Boschan
  150          0.50   1.50  3♣ N +2   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B3-Clark-Bejuene
12 ♠Q
KJT9765
95
♣Q93
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠K53
AQ32
QT3
♣J82
♠72
-
AKJ87
♣AKT764
♠AJT9864
84
642
♣5
8
1215
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣1 ♦1 ♥6 ♠6 NT1
EW: 5♣ 5 6NT  ♥6 ♠6
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: -990 6NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  100          2.00   0.00  5* E -1  B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B3-Clark-Bejuene
        130    1.00   1.00  4 W      B4-Johnson-Johnson vs B5-Davis-Newman
        150    0.00   2.00  3 E +2   B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B2-Boschan-Boschan
13 ♠985
AT7653
KQ7
♣7
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠A3
KQ
JT863
♣A862
♠QT742
J42
5
♣Q543
♠KJ6
98
A942
♣KJT9
9
145
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1/2 3 2NT  ♣6 ♠6
EW: 1♣  ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  120          2.00   0.00  1N S +1   B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B2-Boschan-Boschan
        100    0.50   1.50  4 N -1   B4-Johnson-Johnson vs B5-Davis-Newman
        100    0.50   1.50  3 N -1   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B3-Clark-Bejuene
14 ♠Q753
T543
K43
♣A9
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠JT
K8
QT98
♣JT873
♠842
J762
652
♣K54
♠AK96
AQ9
AJ7
♣Q62
9
74
20
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 3 4 5♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠2 NT3
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: +450 5♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  450          2.00   0.00  4♠ S +1   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B3-Clark-Bejuene
  430          1.00   1.00  3N S +1   B4-Johnson-Johnson vs B5-Davis-Newman
         50    0.00   2.00  4♠ N -1   B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B2-Boschan-Boschan
15 ♠K653
Q432
9642
♣7
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠QT2
A
AJ87
♣KJ653
♠J74
JT987
KQ
♣A92
♠A98
K65
T53
♣QT84
5
1511
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4
EW: 4♣ 3 2 2♠ 3NT
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -400 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
   50          1.50   0.50  3N W -1   B4-Johnson-Johnson vs B5-Davis-Newman
   50          1.50   0.50  3N E -1   B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B2-Boschan-Boschan
        120    0.00   2.00  2N W      B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B3-Clark-Bejuene
16 ♠J52
8632
J987
♣T7
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠QT94
AK5
Q5
♣J942
♠73
QJ74
K642
♣K63
♠AK86
T9
AT3
♣AQ85
2
129
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 1♠  ♣6 ♥6 NT6
EW: 1♣ 1  ♦6 ♠6/5 NT6
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +80 1♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
   90          2.00   0.00  1N S      B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B3-Clark-Bejuene
         50    1.00   1.00  2♠ S -1   B5-Davis-Newman vs B2-Boschan-Boschan
         90    0.00   2.00  1N W      B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B4-Johnson-Johnson
17 ♠K
Q98763
AJ952
♣J
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠Q95
JT52
QT73
♣K2
♠T82
K
64
♣AQT8654
♠AJ7643
A4
K8
♣973
11
89
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 5 3♠  ♣5 NT6
EW: 1♣  ♦2 ♥1 ♠4 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +450 5-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  140          2.00   0.00  3♠ S      B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B4-Johnson-Johnson
   50          1.00   1.00  3♣ E -1   B5-Davis-Newman vs B2-Boschan-Boschan
        100    0.00   2.00  4♠ S -2   B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B3-Clark-Bejuene
18 ♠974
AQJ32
985
♣62
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠AK652
54
K732
♣K5
♠J8
9876
AQ
♣T9874
♠QT3
KT
JT64
♣AQJ3
7
137
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1NT  ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5
EW: 2♣ 2♠  ♦6 ♥6 NT6
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -110 2♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        110    2.00   0.00  1♠ W +1   B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B3-Clark-Bejuene
        200    1.00   1.00  2 N -2   B5-Davis-Newman vs B2-Boschan-Boschan
        300    0.00   2.00  3 N -3   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B4-Johnson-Johnson
19 ♠A985
AK72
3
♣KT97
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠QT4
65
AQT76
♣854
♠J3
J43
K952
♣Q632
♠K762
QT98
J84
♣AJ
14
87
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 1 5 5♠ 2NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦6 ♥2 ♠2 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +450 5♠-NS/5-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  450          2.00   0.00  4 S +1   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B4-Johnson-Johnson
    PASS       1.00   1.00  Pass Out  B5-Davis-Newman vs B2-Boschan-Boschan
         50    0.00   2.00  4 S -1   B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B3-Clark-Bejuene
20 ♠AKT32
T74
K72
♣82
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠98
Q9652
J965
♣93
♠QJ654
K3
Q8
♣AKJ4
♠7
AJ8
AT43
♣QT765
10
316
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1 1 1♠ 2/1NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT5
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +120 2NT-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  300          2.00   0.00  2♠ W -3   B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B3-Clark-Bejuene
        100    0.50   1.50  2♣ S -1   B5-Davis-Newman vs B2-Boschan-Boschan
        100    0.50   1.50  2♣ S -1   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B4-Johnson-Johnson