- Friday Aft - January 26, 2018

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Field strength:  Mean: 600 MP  Geomean: 385 MP
(based on 20 players)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Irene Petroff - Judith Murphy 63.00 1st A 0.50
Alan Greenberg - Arline Benzien 59.00 2nd A 0.35
Christopher Gillmon - Mark Robbins 56.00 1st A 0.50
Ken Ellenberger - Peggy Nielsen 51.00 2nd A 0.35
EVENT>Event Name               |SESSION>Friday Aft   |SECTION> A N-S
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>January 26, 2018   |CLUB NO.>273037    | 01/26/2018 15:58
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Louise Shaffer  |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 70% Open)|MOVEMENT>MITCHELL
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   50.0 |TOP>   4 |MP LIMITS>None/800/200   |CLUB>Oak View Bridge Club
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=5/B=2/C=0                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Ginny Rockefeller      Joan Glenn               A    .     .     .     31.00  31.00
 2 Irene Petroff          Judith Murphy            B    1     1     .     63.00  63.00  0.50(A)
 3 Joann Bowen            Carole Cardinal          A    .     .     .     49.50  49.50
 4 Alan Greenberg         Arline Benzien           A    2     .     .     59.00  59.00  0.35(A)
 5 Jody Shapiro           Mimi Draves              B    .     .     .     47.50  47.50
                                          Totals                         250.00

EVENT>Event Name               |SESSION>Friday Aft   |SECTION> A E-W
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
AVE>   50.0 |TOP>   4 |MP LIMITS>None/800/200   |CLUB>Oak View Bridge Club
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=5/B=5/C=1                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Peggy Nielsen          Ken Ellenberger          B    2     2     .     51.00  51.00  0.35(A)
 2 Marilyn Waples         Anne Conn                B    .     .     .     47.50  47.50
 3 Elaine Mcadams         Nita Whaley              B    .     .     .     48.50  48.50
 4 Mary Jane Graham       Pat Shaw                 C    .     .     .     47.00  47.00
 5 Mark Robbins           Christopher Gillmon      B    1     1     .     56.00  56.00  0.50(A)
                                          Totals                         250.00

Hands and Results
1 ♠9764
JT7
A73
♣A82
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠Q5
AK53
QJ82
♣Q76
♠KJ3
962
K96
♣J954
♠AT82
Q84
T54
♣KT3
9
148
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT5
EW: 2♣ 2 2 1♠ 2NT
LoTT: 14 - 15 = -1
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
         90    3.00   1.00  1N W      A3-Bowen-Cardinal vs A5-Robbins-Gillmon
         90    3.00   1.00  1N E      A1-Rockefeller-Glenn vs A1-Nielsen-Ellenberger
         90    3.00   1.00  1N E      A2-Petroff-Murphy vs A3-Mcadams-Whaley
        100    1.00   3.00  2♠ S -2   A4-Greenberg-Benzien vs A2-Waples-Conn
        120    0.00   4.00  1N E +1   A5-Shapiro-Draves vs A4-Graham-Shaw

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

This hand should pass around to West, who can open 1. East responds 1NT, and when no one else has anything to add, that looks like it.
The defense can get their top Aces and King and then another long trick if they go after it, but declarer should be fine getting to at least 7 tricks and has some squeeze lines of play for an 8th trick.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

2 ♠QT42
Q9
AQ84
♣Q53
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠J93
A862
J63
♣T97
♠AK8
K7
T952
♣KJ84
♠765
JT543
K7
♣A62
12
614
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 1/-♠  ♣5 ♦5 ♠7/6 NT6
EW: 2♣ 1  ♥6 ♠6 NT6
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: -90 2♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  120          4.00   0.00  1N S +1   A2-Petroff-Murphy vs A3-Mcadams-Whaley
         90    2.50   1.50  1N E      A3-Bowen-Cardinal vs A5-Robbins-Gillmon
         90    2.50   1.50  1N E      A4-Greenberg-Benzien vs A2-Waples-Conn
        100    1.00   3.00  1N S -1   A5-Shapiro-Draves vs A4-Graham-Shaw
        200    0.00   4.00  2♠ N -2   A1-Rockefeller-Glenn vs A1-Nielsen-Ellenberger

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

East opens 1 and South passes, not really wanting a lead and not overburdened with values, so no reason to overcall. West in fact responds 1, and North likely passes (he could consider overcalling 1 while the auction is low). East rebids 1NT as he doesn't have enough to make a Support Double(s) , and so South is blocked out. No one else has any particular reason to argue with 1NT, so here we are again.
If South somehow finds the lead of a small , he can set up quite a few tricks for the defense - eventually 1, 3, 3, and 1. But the defense might not be able to beat this on another lead if they let declarer set up his tricks (or South even actively helps him by leading or !). In that case, declarer could come to 2/3, 2, and up to 2/3 with some help (without help he won't be able to get to the dummy enough to avoid losing 2 tricks.) But in general, it looks like declarer may struggle with this even if the defense stumbles.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

3 ♠J32
KJ62
JT
♣KQJ3
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠4
QT85
A642
♣T982
♠Q7
A
K98753
♣A765
♠AKT9865
9743
Q
♣4
12
613
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 3♠  ♣4 ♦3 NT5
EW: 3♣ 4  ♥4 ♠3 NT6
LoTT: 19 - 20 = -1
Par: -100 4♠*-NS/4*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  420          3.50   0.50  4♠ S      A1-Rockefeller-Glenn vs A1-Nielsen-Ellenberger
  420          3.50   0.50  4♠ S      A5-Shapiro-Draves vs A4-Graham-Shaw
  170          2.00   2.00  3♠ S +1   A4-Greenberg-Benzien vs A2-Waples-Conn
  140          1.00   3.00  3♠ S      A3-Bowen-Cardinal vs A5-Robbins-Gillmon
         50    0.00   4.00  5♠ S -1   A2-Petroff-Murphy vs A3-Mcadams-Whaley

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

South preempts this hand - either 3 or 4, especially at these colors - but he could also pass if he suspects he might miss a game in . West can't say anything and North is happy with his support (although he would prefer even just one Ace), and East has a good hand but quite a few losers, so he probably lets it go. (He might double, but that Qx looks useless, and who knows what's going on with these Kings, so it would be risky.)
In 4, this may be more up to the defense to beat rather than to the declarer to make. If the defense can get East his ruff, they can come to 1, 1, and 1 to beat the game - but that requires some very precise defense - either a lead, return, ruff, cash; or lead and then //.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

4 ♠76
KQJ82
JT53
♣Q2
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠KQJ54
73
A87
♣A64
♠AT
A9
Q42
♣KJT753
♠9832
T654
K96
♣98
9
1414
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣0 ♦4 ♠0 NT0
EW: 7♣ 3 7♠ 7NT  ♥6
LoTT: 20 - 18 = +2
Par: -2220 7NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        630    4.00   0.00  3N W +1   A5-Shapiro-Draves vs A4-Graham-Shaw
        640    3.00   1.00  5♣ E +2   A2-Petroff-Murphy vs A3-Mcadams-Whaley
        660    2.00   2.00  3N E +2   A1-Rockefeller-Glenn vs A1-Nielsen-Ellenberger
        690    1.00   3.00  3N W +3   A4-Greenberg-Benzien vs A2-Waples-Conn
        720    0.00   4.00  3N W +4   A3-Bowen-Cardinal vs A5-Robbins-Gillmon

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

West opens 1NT (1 is acceptable, but with rebid issues, 1NT is probably a better descriptor) and North passes or gets in there with a 2-suited bid for the reds. Over a bid, East makes a forcing 3 bid and South passes. Now West gets to show his 5-card suit with 3, and East tries either a 4 minorwood bid (allowing him to get out in NT still - even better would be 4 as Q-minorwood!), or if that's not available, 4NT quantitative. Minorwood gets them to at least 6, and much more likely 6NT; a quantitative 4NT will only get them that far. (A good reason to upgrade this hand with a source of tricks - hard for West to judge opposite just a quantitative bid.) Alternately, if North doesn't bid, East can transfer to and if West shows a superaccept, East might get excited - but again, a quantitative bid will get passed.
So 6NT (and as we can see, actually 7NT) will hinge on finding the Q if the defense attacks right away. There isn't really a "safe" hand into which to finesse (although North's declaration of 9+ cards in the reds may lead declarer astray about the Q), but today declarer can just fall back on the "8 ever, 9 never" adage and get the queen to drop. If he does that, he gets all 13 tricks! 6 (and we can see 7) is safer, but less likely to be bid.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

5 ♠K83
AKJ9643
A
♣T8
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠AJ7
5
K853
♣AK642
♠542
Q7
Q97642
♣75
♠QT96
T82
JT
♣QJ93
15
154
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 1♠ 2NT  ♣6 ♦3
EW: 1♣ 3/4  ♥3 ♠4/5 NT3
LoTT: 19 - 20 = -1
Par: -130 4-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  790          4.00   0.00  4* N     A3-Bowen-Cardinal vs A5-Robbins-Gillmon
  620          3.00   1.00  4 N      A4-Greenberg-Benzien vs A2-Waples-Conn
  170          2.00   2.00  3 S +1   A5-Shapiro-Draves vs A4-Graham-Shaw
        100    0.50   3.50  4 N -1   A1-Rockefeller-Glenn vs A1-Nielsen-Ellenberger
        100    0.50   3.50  4 N -1   A2-Petroff-Murphy vs A3-Mcadams-Whaley

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

North opens 1 and East passes. South bids 1, and West pipes up with either 2 or a double. North is probably angling to bid 4 anyways, and he's even more comfortable bidding it now. (And if West doubled, East may take the 5 sacrifice.)
This is another hand that the defense will have to beat. East needs to lead his doubleton in order to get a ruff/uppercut on declarer to beat this. If he does, then North loses 2, 1, and 1. (He could also lead a and then have West switch to .) But a red suit lead will let declarer make this when he only loses 1 and 2 (easier to guess the J in West on the auction.)



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

6 ♠T43
K872
QT864
♣2
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠QJ965
96543
K
♣K3
♠AK8
T
AJ952
♣Q765
♠72
AQJ
73
♣AJT984
5
914
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT5
EW: 1♣ 2 1 3♠ 2NT
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  200          3.50   0.50  3N E -2   A2-Petroff-Murphy vs A2-Waples-Conn
  200          3.50   0.50  4♠ W -2   A4-Greenberg-Benzien vs A1-Nielsen-Ellenberger
  100          1.50   2.50  4♠ W -1   A5-Shapiro-Draves vs A3-Mcadams-Whaley
  100          1.50   2.50  3♠ W -1   A3-Bowen-Cardinal vs A4-Graham-Shaw
       1400    0.00   4.00  5♣* S -6  A1-Rockefeller-Glenn vs A5-Robbins-Gillmon

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

East opens 1 and South overcalls 2. West doubles and North passes. East may try 2 to see what that fetches, and South passes (3 is tempting, but he can relax and let North compete if needed.) West could bump to 3 but East isn't biting and here the auction ends.
While those are in good shape, West does have a whole bunch of losing to worry about. One can go on the A, but when the defense figures out to lead trump to stop these ruffs (best would be on opening lead!), declarer winds up losing 1 and 3 (would be 4, but South has the entries and only 2 to lead) - or the defense can get North a ruff.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

7 ♠QJ3
94
9872
♣A975
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠K985
KQ8
Q63
♣Q32
♠T4
AJ532
AK5
♣KJ8
♠A762
T76
JT4
♣T64
7
1216
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦3 ♥2 ♠4 NT2
EW: 3♣ 3 5 3♠ 4NT
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -650 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        630    3.50   0.50  3N W +1   A2-Petroff-Murphy vs A2-Waples-Conn
        630    3.50   0.50  3N E +1   A4-Greenberg-Benzien vs A1-Nielsen-Ellenberger
        650    1.50   2.50  4 E +1   A1-Rockefeller-Glenn vs A5-Robbins-Gillmon
        650    1.50   2.50  4 E +1   A5-Shapiro-Draves vs A3-Mcadams-Whaley
        660    0.00   4.00  3N W +2   A3-Bowen-Cardinal vs A4-Graham-Shaw

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

South passes and West limps in with 1. North passes and East responds 1. West rebids 1NT, East goes through some flavor of New Minor Forcing to find the 8-card fit, and bids the 4 game. (If West rebids 1 instead of 1NT, the East goes through 4th Suit Forcing and gets to 4 that way.)
NS have 2 Aces to cash, but that's about it when the A is onside.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

8 ♠6532
AQ7543
QJ
♣K
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠AQT74
KT
K9872
♣J
♠K8
J62
AT54
♣AT97
♠J9
98
63
♣Q865432
12
1312
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦0 ♥5 ♠1 NT2
EW: 1♣ 5/6 2 5/6♠ 5NT
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -980 6♠-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
   50          4.00   0.00  2♠ W -1   A2-Petroff-Murphy vs A2-Waples-Conn
        150    3.00   1.00  4 W +1   A4-Greenberg-Benzien vs A1-Nielsen-Ellenberger
        420    2.00   2.00  5 W +1   A5-Shapiro-Draves vs A3-Mcadams-Whaley
        430    1.00   3.00  3N E +1   A3-Bowen-Cardinal vs A4-Graham-Shaw
        490    0.00   4.00  3N W +3   A1-Rockefeller-Glenn vs A5-Robbins-Gillmon

AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis

West opens 1 and North overcalls 2. East doubles and South keeps his mouth shut. West has an easy 3 rebid, and now East can perk up a little. He may try a 3 Western cuebid , discovering that partner has a stopper when West rebids 3NT. Now if East is really thinking, he may start to see the slam possibilities (as long as his partner gets to play it - but fortunately West has bid everything first), and he could try 4 - minorwood or not, it must be forward-going. West would respond to minorwood, of course, but even if this is just an encouraging 4 bid, West should be encouraged and cuebid his A. Now East knows the stopper is not the A, so he might slow down and just bid 4NT or 5, or he may push on to 6 (6NT a little more shaky with what feels like only 1 and 1 stopper.) But it's also very reasonable to just play this hand in 3NT.
As long as West is declaring and his K is protected on opening lead, this slam works in either or . He loses just the 1 when the all come in and the are split 2-2, no finesse needed, IF declarer can get this Restricted Choice situation "right" - hard to do! In 3NT, declarer will have a little more time to find out that North is 6-4, and that might help with the tricks, but he would still only have 11 tricks coming if the defense doesn't lead .



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com

9 ♠KJ8743
9864
5
♣KJ
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠A962
75
J9
♣A8732
♠Q
AQJ
AKQT632
♣Q6
♠T5
KT32
874
♣T954
8
920
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 1♠  ♣3 ♦2 NT2
EW: 3♣ 5 5NT  ♥6 ♠6
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -660 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        130    4.00   0.00  3 E +1   A2-Petroff-Murphy vs A2-Waples-Conn
        150    3.00   1.00  3 E +2   A3-Bowen-Cardinal vs A4-Graham-Shaw
        600    2.00   2.00  5 E      A5-Shapiro-Draves vs A3-Mcadams-Whaley
        660    1.00   3.00  4N W +1   A4-Greenberg-Benzien vs A1-Nielsen-Ellenberger
       1440    0.00   4.00  6N W      A1-Rockefeller-Glenn vs A5-Robbins-Gillmon
10 ♠T942
84
T2
♣JT842
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠6
KQ762
KQJ43
♣K6
♠KQ873
JT5
85
♣AQ3
♠AJ5
A93
A976
♣975
1
1412
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦3 ♥2 ♠5 NT3
EW: 1♣ 3 4 2♠ 3NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -620 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
         90    4.00   0.00  2 W      A3-Bowen-Cardinal vs A4-Graham-Shaw
        200    3.00   1.00  2 W +3   A2-Petroff-Murphy vs A2-Waples-Conn
        630    2.00   2.00  3N E +1   A5-Shapiro-Draves vs A3-Mcadams-Whaley
        650    0.50   3.50  4 W +1   A1-Rockefeller-Glenn vs A5-Robbins-Gillmon
        650    0.50   3.50  4 W +1   A4-Greenberg-Benzien vs A1-Nielsen-Ellenberger
11 ♠T875
J3
82
♣AJT74
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠KQ
Q872
KT7543
♣3
♠A9642
AK9
J9
♣K62
♠J3
T654
AQ6
♣Q985
6
1015
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 ♠2 NT2
EW: 5 4 4♠ 2NT  ♣6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -420 4♠-EW/4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  100          4.00   0.00  4♠ E -2   A3-Bowen-Cardinal vs A3-Mcadams-Whaley
   50          1.50   2.50  3N E -1   A1-Rockefeller-Glenn vs A4-Graham-Shaw
   50          1.50   2.50  3N E -1   A2-Petroff-Murphy vs A1-Nielsen-Ellenberger
   50          1.50   2.50  3N E -1   A4-Greenberg-Benzien vs A5-Robbins-Gillmon
   50          1.50   2.50  2N E -1   A5-Shapiro-Draves vs A2-Waples-Conn
12 ♠QT9642
AJ2
95
♣T9
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠3
KQ86
T764
♣A543
♠AKJ87
54
J3
♣KJ62
♠5
T973
AKQ82
♣Q87
7
913
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣4 ♥6 ♠6 NT6
EW: 3♣ 1♠ 1NT  ♦6 ♥6
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: -110 3♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  200          4.00   0.00  3 W -4   A4-Greenberg-Benzien vs A5-Robbins-Gillmon
   50          2.50   1.50  2♠ E -1   A1-Rockefeller-Glenn vs A4-Graham-Shaw
   50          2.50   1.50  3♣ E -1   A5-Shapiro-Draves vs A2-Waples-Conn
        110    1.00   3.00  3♣ E      A2-Petroff-Murphy vs A1-Nielsen-Ellenberger
        200    0.00   4.00  2♠ N -2   A3-Bowen-Cardinal vs A3-Mcadams-Whaley
13 ♠Q8753
KJ765
A
♣96
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠A42
AQT32
K
♣AK74
♠KJT
984
T987
♣QT5
♠96
-
QJ65432
♣J832
10
206
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT3
EW: 3♣ 1 4 2♠ 4NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -630 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  200          4.00   0.00  4* W -1  A2-Petroff-Murphy vs A1-Nielsen-Ellenberger
  100          2.50   1.50  3N E -1   A5-Shapiro-Draves vs A2-Waples-Conn
  100          2.50   1.50  3 W -1   A3-Bowen-Cardinal vs A3-Mcadams-Whaley
        620    1.00   3.00  4 W      A1-Rockefeller-Glenn vs A4-Graham-Shaw
        790    0.00   4.00  4* W     A4-Greenberg-Benzien vs A5-Robbins-Gillmon
14 ♠6
K82
Q9743
♣J954
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠K975
96
K5
♣KT763
♠8432
AJ73
T2
♣A82
♠AQJT
QT54
AJ86
♣Q
6
99
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 4 2 1NT  ♠6
EW:  ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT5
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +130 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  150          4.00   0.00  3♠ W -3   A5-Shapiro-Draves vs A2-Waples-Conn
  110          3.00   1.00  3 S      A2-Petroff-Murphy vs A1-Nielsen-Ellenberger
   90          2.00   2.00  1 S +1   A3-Bowen-Cardinal vs A3-Mcadams-Whaley
         50    1.00   3.00  4 S -1   A4-Greenberg-Benzien vs A5-Robbins-Gillmon
        150    0.00   4.00  3N S -3   A1-Rockefeller-Glenn vs A4-Graham-Shaw
15 ♠T32
KQ5
AJ54
♣K62
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠AQ98
A97
T7
♣QT97
♠7654
T
K9632
♣AJ5
♠KJ
J86432
Q8
♣843
13
128
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 ♠2 NT4
EW: 3♣ 3 1 5♠ 2NT
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -450 5♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
   50          4.00   0.00  4 W -1   A4-Greenberg-Benzien vs A5-Robbins-Gillmon
        120    3.00   1.00  1N W +1   A2-Petroff-Murphy vs A1-Nielsen-Ellenberger
        140    2.00   2.00  2♠ E +1   A5-Shapiro-Draves vs A2-Waples-Conn
        170    1.00   3.00  2♠ E +2   A3-Bowen-Cardinal vs A3-Mcadams-Whaley
        450    0.00   4.00  4♠ E +1   A1-Rockefeller-Glenn vs A4-Graham-Shaw
16 ♠KT5
7542
J83
♣QT4
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠Q74
J3
962
♣KJ753
♠AJ86
AKT9
K74
♣A2
♠932
Q86
AQT5
♣986
6
719
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT5
EW: 3♣ 3/1 2 3♠ 1NT
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  200          4.00   0.00  3N E -2   A4-Greenberg-Benzien vs A4-Graham-Shaw
  100          2.00   2.00  3N W -1   A1-Rockefeller-Glenn vs A3-Mcadams-Whaley
  100          2.00   2.00  3N W -1   A3-Bowen-Cardinal vs A2-Waples-Conn
  100          2.00   2.00  3N E -1   A2-Petroff-Murphy vs A5-Robbins-Gillmon
        120    0.00   4.00  2N W      A5-Shapiro-Draves vs A1-Nielsen-Ellenberger
17 ♠-
Q9762
KJ985
♣Q94
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠QJT8654
A
T2
♣A63
♠A732
KT83
A4
♣JT5
♠K9
J54
Q763
♣K872
8
1112
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 1  ♣6 ♠2 NT3
EW: 4♠ 2NT  ♣6 ♦5 ♥6
LoTT: 18 - 20 = -2
Par: -420 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
   50          4.00   0.00  5♠ W -1   A4-Greenberg-Benzien vs A4-Graham-Shaw
        300    3.00   1.00  5* N -2  A1-Rockefeller-Glenn vs A3-Mcadams-Whaley
        420    2.00   2.00  4♠ W      A2-Petroff-Murphy vs A5-Robbins-Gillmon
        450    0.50   3.50  4♠ W +1   A3-Bowen-Cardinal vs A2-Waples-Conn
        450    0.50   3.50  4♠ W +1   A5-Shapiro-Draves vs A1-Nielsen-Ellenberger
18 ♠AQ42
Q74
AQ52
♣A9
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠9763
K
KJ9
♣KJ872
♠T5
J982
T76
♣T643
♠KJ8
AT653
843
♣Q5
18
111
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: -/1♣ 4/5 5/6 5♠ 3/5NT
       ♣6/7
EW:  ♣6 ♦2 ♥1 ♠2 NT2
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +1430 6-N
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  690          4.00   0.00  3N N +3   A1-Rockefeller-Glenn vs A3-Mcadams-Whaley
  650          2.00   2.00  4 N +1   A2-Petroff-Murphy vs A5-Robbins-Gillmon
  650          2.00   2.00  4 N +1   A3-Bowen-Cardinal vs A2-Waples-Conn
  650          2.00   2.00  4 N +1   A4-Greenberg-Benzien vs A4-Graham-Shaw
  140          0.00   4.00  1♠ N +2   A5-Shapiro-Draves vs A1-Nielsen-Ellenberger
19 ♠98762
Q
Q7
♣KQT82
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠KT
K9
K85432
♣976
♠QJ
AJ83
AJ9
♣AJ54
♠A543
T76542
T6
♣3
9
918
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♠  ♣4 ♦2 ♥5 NT2
EW: 3♣ 5 2 5NT  ♠5
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: -660 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        150    3.50   0.50  4 W +1   A5-Shapiro-Draves vs A1-Nielsen-Ellenberger
        150    3.50   0.50  3 W +2   A3-Bowen-Cardinal vs A2-Waples-Conn
        630    2.00   2.00  3N E +1   A4-Greenberg-Benzien vs A4-Graham-Shaw
        660    1.00   3.00  3N W +2   A2-Petroff-Murphy vs A5-Robbins-Gillmon
        690    0.00   4.00  3N E +3   A1-Rockefeller-Glenn vs A3-Mcadams-Whaley
20 ♠A96
A98753
76
♣65
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠K8
KQ642
J32
♣J32
♠5432
J
QT98
♣AKT8
♠QJT7
T
AK54
♣Q974
8
1010
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2 2 3♠ 2NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT5
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  400          4.00   0.00  2 W -4   A4-Greenberg-Benzien vs A4-Graham-Shaw
  300          3.00   1.00  2 W -3   A2-Petroff-Murphy vs A5-Robbins-Gillmon
  150          2.00   2.00  1N N +2   A1-Rockefeller-Glenn vs A3-Mcadams-Whaley
        200    0.50   3.50  3N S -2   A3-Bowen-Cardinal vs A2-Waples-Conn
        200    0.50   3.50  2 S -2   A5-Shapiro-Draves vs A1-Nielsen-Ellenberger
21 ♠KQJT2
KQT8
96
♣T6
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠854
A7652
AQ72
♣7
♠963
J
J843
♣AK852
♠A7
943
KT5
♣QJ943
11
109
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 1NT  ♣6 ♦4 ♠6
EW: 1♣ 2  ♥6 ♠5 NT5
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -90 2-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  110          4.00   0.00  1♠ N +1   A2-Petroff-Murphy vs A4-Graham-Shaw
  100          3.00   1.00  3 W -2   A5-Shapiro-Draves vs A5-Robbins-Gillmon
        100    1.50   2.50  2N S -1   A3-Bowen-Cardinal vs A1-Nielsen-Ellenberger
        100    1.50   2.50  2♠ N -1   A4-Greenberg-Benzien vs A3-Mcadams-Whaley
        110    0.00   4.00  2 W +1   A1-Rockefeller-Glenn vs A2-Waples-Conn
22 ♠QT
T832
96
♣J8753
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠A973
AJ6
A852
♣AT
♠6542
KQ95
QJ4
♣Q2
♠KJ8
74
KT73
♣K964
3
1710
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT3
EW: 1♣ 4 4 4♠ 4NT
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -630 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  200          3.50   0.50  4♠ W -2   A2-Petroff-Murphy vs A4-Graham-Shaw
  200          3.50   0.50  4♠ W -2   A4-Greenberg-Benzien vs A3-Mcadams-Whaley
  100          2.00   2.00  4♠ W -1   A3-Bowen-Cardinal vs A1-Nielsen-Ellenberger
        620    1.00   3.00  4♠ W      A1-Rockefeller-Glenn vs A2-Waples-Conn
        650    0.00   4.00  5♠ W      A5-Shapiro-Draves vs A5-Robbins-Gillmon
23 ♠93
A8
A32
♣KT8765
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠A6
KQ764
KQJ4
♣A2
♠T87542
JT92
T8
♣4
♠KQJ
53
9765
♣QJ93
11
191
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1NT  ♦4 ♥3 ♠4
EW: 1 4 3♠  ♣4 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 19 = -1
Par: -620 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        100    4.00   0.00  3♣ N -1   A4-Greenberg-Benzien vs A3-Mcadams-Whaley
        140    3.00   1.00  2♠ E +1   A5-Shapiro-Draves vs A5-Robbins-Gillmon
        170    2.00   2.00  3 W +1   A3-Bowen-Cardinal vs A1-Nielsen-Ellenberger
        620    0.50   3.50  4 W      A1-Rockefeller-Glenn vs A2-Waples-Conn
        620    0.50   3.50  4 W      A2-Petroff-Murphy vs A4-Graham-Shaw
24 ♠A83
AKT32
Q8
♣AK7
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠KQ965
J4
JT942
♣T
♠742
75
K63
♣86543
♠JT
Q986
A75
♣QJ92
20
73
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 6 5NT  ♦6/5 ♠5
EW: 1 1♠  ♣3 ♥1 NT1
LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: +980 6-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  980          3.50   0.50  6 N      A2-Petroff-Murphy vs A4-Graham-Shaw
  980          3.50   0.50  6 N      A3-Bowen-Cardinal vs A1-Nielsen-Ellenberger
  480          2.00   2.00  4 N +2   A1-Rockefeller-Glenn vs A2-Waples-Conn
  100          1.00   3.00  3♠* W -1  A5-Shapiro-Draves vs A5-Robbins-Gillmon
         50    0.00   4.00  6 N -1   A4-Greenberg-Benzien vs A3-Mcadams-Whaley
25 ♠AKQT654
5
K876
♣5
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠7
AJ83
J4
♣QJ9872
♠982
Q7
QT932
♣AK6
♠J3
KT9642
A5
♣T43
12
911
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: -/1 4♠  ♣3 ♦6/7 ♥6 NT5
EW: 4♣ 1  ♦6 ♠3 NT4
LoTT: 20 - 18 = +2
Par: +200 5♣*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  450          4.00   0.00  4♠ S +1   A5-Shapiro-Draves vs A5-Robbins-Gillmon
  420          2.50   1.50  4♠ N      A3-Bowen-Cardinal vs A1-Nielsen-Ellenberger
  420          2.50   1.50  4♠ N      A4-Greenberg-Benzien vs A3-Mcadams-Whaley
         50    0.50   3.50  4♠ N -1   A1-Rockefeller-Glenn vs A2-Waples-Conn
         50    0.50   3.50  4♠ N -1   A2-Petroff-Murphy vs A4-Graham-Shaw