- Wednesday Aft - October 10, 2018

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 31 32 33 34
Field strength:  Mean: 12 MP  Geomean: 11 MP
(based on 6 players, 6 non ACBL players ignored)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Chris Johnson - Dana Johnson 65.00 1st A 0.36
Bob Deal - Merrily Lewis 58.75 2nd A 0.25
Carol Howe - Lucien Lacour 51.25 1st B 0.12
EVENT>49er Pairs               |SESSION>Wednesday Aft|SECTION> B
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>October 10, 2018   |CLUB NO.>131102    | 10/10/2018 15:29
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Tom Ciacio      |RATING>Club Masterpoint (60%, 40% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   20.0 |TOP>   2 |MP LIMITS>50/10          |CLUB>Ventura Unit Bridge Club
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=6/B=3                           ,---,-------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |      Section      |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Kathy Franklin         Judy Shaw                B    .     .     20.00  50.00
 2 Katarina Bernbaum      Lynn Arneill-Brown       B    .     .     12.00  30.00
 3 Dana Johnson           Chris Johnson            A    1     .     26.00  65.00  0.36(A)
 4 Merrily Lewis          Bob Deal                 A    2     .     23.50  58.75  0.25(A)
 5 Carol Howe             Lucien Lacour            B    .     1     20.50  51.25  0.12(B)
 6 Robert Carrier         Richard Cathcart         A    .     .     18.00  45.00
                                          Totals                   120.00

Hands and Results
1 ♠A5
-
KT64
♣AKJT765
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠K74
J973
Q95
♣Q98
♠T98632
KT865
J8
♣-
♠QJ
AQ42
A732
♣432
15
84
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 6♣ 6 1 6NT  ♠6
EW: 1♠  ♣1 ♦1 ♥6 NT1
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: +990 6NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  420          1.00   1.00  5♣ N +1   B2-Bernbaum-Arneill-Brown vs B4-Lewis-Deal
  420          1.00   1.00  5♣ N +1   B3-Johnson-Johnson vs B5-Howe-Lacour
  420          1.00   1.00  5♣ N +1   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B1-Franklin-Shaw
2 ♠7
93
7542
♣QJ9743
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠J652
T75
AKJT
♣62
♠AKT98
KQJ84
Q6
♣A
♠Q43
A62
983
♣KT85
3
919
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦2 ♥2 ♠2 NT2
EW: 4 5 5♠ 1NT  ♣6
LoTT: 18 - 19 = -1
Par: -450 5♠-EW/5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        200    2.00   0.00  2♠ E +3   B3-Johnson-Johnson vs B5-Howe-Lacour
        450    0.50   1.50  4♠ E +1   B2-Bernbaum-Arneill-Brown vs B4-Lewis-Deal
        450    0.50   1.50  4♠ E +1   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B1-Franklin-Shaw
3 ♠6
83
KQ9643
♣KT85
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠AJ973
J65
72
♣A97
♠Q5
AKQT97
AT8
♣QJ
♠KT842
42
J5
♣6432
8
1018
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦6 ♥1 ♠3 NT1
EW: 1♣ 6 4♠ 6NT  ♦6
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -1440 6NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        200    2.00   0.00  3 E +2   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B1-Franklin-Shaw
        650    0.50   1.50  4 E +1   B2-Bernbaum-Arneill-Brown vs B4-Lewis-Deal
        650    0.50   1.50  4 E +1   B3-Johnson-Johnson vs B5-Howe-Lacour
4 ♠A843
J92
KT54
♣J8
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠QJT97
753
AJ7
♣Q6
♠K65
KQT4
96
♣K532
♠2
A86
Q832
♣AT974
9
1011
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 3  ♥5 ♠4 NT6
EW: 2♠  ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +110 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  200          2.00   0.00  2N W -2   B3-Johnson-Johnson vs B5-Howe-Lacour
  100          1.00   1.00  2♠ W -1   B2-Bernbaum-Arneill-Brown vs B4-Lewis-Deal
   90          0.00   2.00  2♣ S      B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B1-Franklin-Shaw
5 ♠T876
QT3
642
♣KQ4
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠KJ5
75
AKQT73
♣T7
♠AQ43
862
J9
♣8532
♠92
AKJ94
85
♣AJ96
7
137
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 3  ♦3 ♠3 NT3
EW: 3 3♠  ♣4 ♥4 NT4
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  140          1.00   1.00  3 S      B5-Howe-Lacour vs B1-Franklin-Shaw
  140          1.00   1.00  2 S +1   B3-Johnson-Johnson vs B4-Lewis-Deal
  140          1.00   1.00  2 S +1   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B2-Bernbaum-Arneill-Brown

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 PassPass1
223All pass

Both E/W and N/S are making a three level contract, but neither side has a completely straightforward auction to get there. South's 1 opening and West's 2 overcall are both normal, as is North's raise to 2. From here, things get a little more interesting. You might be surprised at the bidding suggestion to raise to 3 in the East hand. However, a two level overcall particularly in a minor should usually be on a six card suit, or on a very good five card suit. Thus, with honor doubleton, raising a minor suit overcall is not, in principle a bad idea. You might argue on this hand that East should be a little stronger for this action, given that West could be lighter than normal at this vulnerability, but the vulnerability also suggests not allowing the opponents to play in a major at the two level. If East passes, should West compete to the three level? The quality of West's suit is such that I think 3 would be a good bid, despite the poor overall distribution (no shortness, no controls in two suits.) So, both East and West have a chance to compete to 3 and the question becomes whether N/S will bid over this? For N/S the vulnerability is an argument against bidding, and North certainly can't bid again with a 4333 hand. South has better distribution, but like West has two doubletons with no controls in either suit. If North has values in either s or s, they might well be wasted. As it happens, of course, North has the absolute perfect hand for South, so bidding on will work out well. Notice, though, how bad things would be for South if North had the K and Q instead of the KQ.

On the actual lie of the cards, 3 has four unavoidable losers. A contract is a little more interesting. There are four top losers, but if N/S don't cash exactly two tricks in each of their side suits, then declarer will be able to pitch a loser on the suit. Fortunately, South should be able to work out the right defense, knowing that North is likely to hold exactly three s on the bidding. Furthermore, South can see that the suit is working for declarer. So, for example, let's say that North leads the King, South encourages and North continues with the Queen. South should have no problem overtaking this since they are holding the Jack, and then cashing out two tricks, rather than leaving North to guess whether to continue with a third round of s. Making a contract will be a top for N/S, and E/W pairs will get a top when N/S misdefend and allow 10 tricks to make in a contract.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

6 ♠875
AQ62
A7
♣KQ97
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠K3
J
KT965432
♣83
♠AT42
K985
QJ8
♣A6
♠QJ96
T743
-
♣JT542
15
714
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1 1♠  ♦2 NT3
EW: 4 1NT  ♣5 ♥5 ♠6
LoTT: 18 - 20 = -2
Par: -130 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  100          1.50   0.50  5 E -1   B3-Johnson-Johnson vs B4-Lewis-Deal
  100          1.50   0.50  5 E -1   B5-Howe-Lacour vs B1-Franklin-Shaw
        130    0.00   2.00  3 E +1   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B2-Bernbaum-Arneill-Brown

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  1Pass
5All pass  

With an eight card suit and few cards in the majors West will not be expecting the bidding to go 1- P to them. How should West proceed? With 7 HCP, it isn't completely clear to preempt, as NT might be a a very good contract if East has a balanced 18-19 HCP. In fact, a grand slam might even be making if East has the four missing Aces and a King. Given the vulnerability, a jump to 5 doesn't show a completely weak hand, however, so slam might still be reached. The argument for preempting is that the opponents are certain to have a major suit fit somewhere. Knowing that E/W hold half the HCP and that South chose not to bid, West might just bid more slowly, hoping to end up in the right contract when East has a strong hand. But what can West bid to show this hand? 2 might work out, but might also make it easy for North to get into the bidding. 4 might also turn out to be the best bid. As with most distributional hands, there are no perfect bids. As it happens, North will indeed want to enter the bidding, and might double no matter what West bids. N/S can't actually make much of anything though it looks unlikely that West will pass even if East starts to penalty double N/S.

A contract has three losers, but only if the defense leads a at trick one. If South leads a , declarer can win the King and immediately lead a . Knowing that declarer can't go wrong in the suit, North can do no better than go up with the Ace and lead a , but it will be too late as declarer can win the Ace, cash the King, pitching a and will only lose the two red suit Aces.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

7 ♠K9
T4
AQJ3
♣KQJ74
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠JT754
QJ97
T4
♣82
♠863
K83
8762
♣T53
♠AQ2
A652
K95
♣A96
16
43
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 7♣ 7 4 3♠ 7NT
EW:  ♣0 ♦0 ♥3 ♠4 NT0
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +2220 7NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
 1470          2.00   0.00  6N N +1   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B2-Bernbaum-Arneill-Brown
  720          1.00   1.00  3N N +4   B3-Johnson-Johnson vs B4-Lewis-Deal
  620          0.00   2.00  5♣ N +1   B5-Howe-Lacour vs B1-Franklin-Shaw

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   1NT
Pass4Pass4NT
Pass6NTAll pass 

Opposite a 1NT opening, North should recognize the power of their two sources of tricks and should drive to the good 6NT contract. Pairs who play a strong 1 opening might just have the bidding tools for North to find out about South's perfect fitting hand and bid a grand slam, but this will not happen at many tables. The only real issue with the North hand is whether to search for a minor suit slam or not. A 4-4 suit fit is particularly appealing, as the suit in the North hand might allow South to pitch away a slow loser, for example, and eventually ruff a in the South hand. Certainly there are more hands that will make a grand slam in a minor suit contract than in NT. However, it doesn't look like North will be able to find out if South has an appropriate hand to make a grand, and since 6NT will outscore a small slam in a minor even if the minor suit contract makes all 13 tricks, it looks like North should just plan on heading to 6NT. North won't have a good way of finding out whether the AK are missing, but they can at least check whether two Aces are missing before blasting into slam. As it happens, of course, South has about the only hand they could have consistent with a 1NT opener that makes 13 tricks cold. Getting to 6NT will be a relatively common result, but still should be above average, as some will play in 6 and there will be a few who don't make it to slam at all. Those who have the tools to get to 7NT will get a well deserved top.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

8 ♠AJ94
K7
AJ98
♣AJ7
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠K83
AJ86
7
♣KQ943
♠75
T9542
Q5432
♣8
♠QT62
Q3
KT6
♣T652
18
132
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 3 5♠ 4NT  ♥5
EW: 1  ♣4 ♦4 ♠2 NT2
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +450 5♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  150          2.00   0.00  1N N +2   B5-Howe-Lacour vs B1-Franklin-Shaw
   90          1.00   1.00  1N N      B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B2-Bernbaum-Arneill-Brown
        250    0.00   2.00  3N N -5   B3-Johnson-Johnson vs B4-Lewis-Deal

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
11NTPass2
Pass2Pass3
Pass4All pass 

N/S will need to be a little aggressive to get to the good 4 game on this hand. After West opens 1NT, North is at the top of a 1NT bid. Most experts play a 1NT overcall with a slightly broader range than a 1NT opening, so 15-18 is pretty normal. If this is the range for N/S, then South is just strong enough to invite to game, starting by looking for a fit. South does have two tens that are paired with other honors, and the 10 is likely to be a working card on this auction as well. Once a fit has been found, South should be happy o invite, and North has an easy acceptance. A contract turns out to be quite a bit better than a NT contract. If East leads a against 3NT, declarer will have to play East for the Queen to make, which will not be easy. Assuming East leads fourth best, declarer can work out that West has four s, but this won't be enough to conclude that West is short in s, as West's and length aren't known. In any case, declarer will be lucky if they are able to work things out. In a contract, life is much easier. Let's say that East leads their singleton . Declarer can win the Ace, lead a to the King and take the finesse, puling trump and eventually giving up one trick in each side suit. Declarer might even work out the situation if they assume that West has five s and some length implied in the majors given East's lack of a bid. It seems unlikely for declarer to play a to the 10 at trick two, but even getting s wrong, a contract will make 10 tricks. Of course, if East leads a against any contract, this will be a disaster for the defense, as it will make things easy for declarer. As some South's will pass 1NT, getting to any game should be a good result for N/S, with top scores going to those who are fortunate enough to get a lead and make either 10 tricks in NT, or 11 tricks in s.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

9 ♠A875
A532
94
♣852
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠KJ
KQ8
AT3
♣KQT76
♠T9632
T4
KQJ
♣J93
♠Q4
J976
87652
♣A4
8
187
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦5 ♥5/6 ♠3/4 NT3
EW: 4♣ 2 1 3♠ 3NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -600 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        110    1.50   0.50  3♣ W      B1-Franklin-Shaw vs B2-Bernbaum-Arneill-Brown
        110    1.50   0.50  3♣ W      B4-Lewis-Deal vs B5-Howe-Lacour
        180    0.00   2.00  2N W +2   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B3-Johnson-Johnson
10 ♠AT64
J5
864
♣Q963
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠J7
QT984
95
♣K854
♠Q98
AK32
AKT7
♣AT
♠K532
76
QJ32
♣J72
7
620
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦4 ♥2 ♠4 NT3
EW: 3♣ 2 5 1♠ 4/3NT
LoTT: 15 - 17 = -2
Par: -650 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        210    2.00   0.00  2N E +3   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B3-Johnson-Johnson
        650    1.00   1.00  4 W +1   B1-Franklin-Shaw vs B2-Bernbaum-Arneill-Brown
        680    0.00   2.00  4 E +2   B4-Lewis-Deal vs B5-Howe-Lacour
11 ♠J3
T8
Q98542
♣976
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠Q9
Q743
AJ6
♣KJ53
♠T842
AKJ96
3
♣A42
♠AK765
52
KT7
♣QT8
3
1312
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣2 ♥2 ♠5 NT3
EW: 4♣ 5 2♠ 4NT  ♦6
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -450 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        170    2.00   0.00  3 E +1   B1-Franklin-Shaw vs B2-Bernbaum-Arneill-Brown
        450    0.50   1.50  4 W +1   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B3-Johnson-Johnson
        450    0.50   1.50  4 E +1   B4-Lewis-Deal vs B5-Howe-Lacour
12 ♠654
QJ3
Q52
♣QJ76
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠KJ9
AK9
JT96
♣A82
♠QT8
7642
AK43
♣K4
♠A732
T85
87
♣T953
8
1612
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT2
EW: 2♣ 5 5 4♠ 4NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -450 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
   50          2.00   0.00  3N W -1   B1-Franklin-Shaw vs B2-Bernbaum-Arneill-Brown
        400    1.00   1.00  3N W      B4-Lewis-Deal vs B5-Howe-Lacour
        430    0.00   2.00  3N E +1   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B3-Johnson-Johnson
13 ♠A3
T952
JT643
♣Q9
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠874
7
KQ5
♣KJ8642
♠KQ65
AQ43
872
♣A3
♠JT92
KJ86
A9
♣T75
7
915
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT2
EW: 5♣ 3♠ 4/2NT  ♦6 ♥6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -630 4NT-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  200          1.50   0.50  3N E -2   B5-Howe-Lacour vs B2-Bernbaum-Arneill-Brown
  200          1.50   0.50  5♣ W -2   B1-Franklin-Shaw vs B3-Johnson-Johnson
        150    0.00   2.00  2N E +1   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B4-Lewis-Deal
14 ♠QJT8
A52
QJ
♣AQ98
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠65
J9763
9875
♣T7
♠K97432
KQT
6
♣653
♠A
84
AKT432
♣KJ42
16
18
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 7♣ 7 2 2♠ 6NT
EW:  ♣0 ♦0 ♥5 ♠5 NT1
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: +1440 7-NS/7♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  490          2.00   0.00  3N N +3   B5-Howe-Lacour vs B2-Bernbaum-Arneill-Brown
  420          1.00   1.00  5 S +1   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B4-Lewis-Deal
  170          0.00   2.00  4♣ S +2   B1-Franklin-Shaw vs B3-Johnson-Johnson
15 ♠AT963
A32
5
♣KQ73
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠J42
Q876
Q972
♣A9
♠KQ
KT95
AKJ4
♣865
♠875
J4
T863
♣JT42
13
916
2
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1♠  ♦4 ♥3 NT5
EW: 3 4 2NT  ♣5 ♠5
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: -420 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        140    2.00   0.00  3 E      B5-Howe-Lacour vs B2-Bernbaum-Arneill-Brown
        170    1.00   1.00  3 W +1   B1-Franklin-Shaw vs B3-Johnson-Johnson
        450    0.00   2.00  4 E +1   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B4-Lewis-Deal
16 ♠Q92
AK6
AT75
♣T74
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠3
Q92
KJ432
♣KQ85
♠AK864
8753
Q6
♣J2
♠JT75
JT4
98
♣A963
13
1110
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1♠ 1NT  ♦5 ♥6
EW: 1 -/1  ♣6 ♥6/7 ♠6 NT6
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +90 1NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  200          2.00   0.00  3N W -2   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B4-Lewis-Deal
         80    1.00   1.00  1♠ E      B1-Franklin-Shaw vs B3-Johnson-Johnson
        120    0.00   2.00  1N W +1   B5-Howe-Lacour vs B2-Bernbaum-Arneill-Brown
31 ♠7
KQJ983
AT
♣AK73
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠A8654
T72
7
♣8542
♠KQ9
A5
KQJ532
♣JT
♠JT32
64
9864
♣Q96
17
416
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2/1♣ 4  ♦5/4 ♠4 NT5
EW: 2 2♠  ♣4 ♥3 NT4
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: +300 4♠*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  930          2.00   0.00  3* N +1  B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B5-Howe-Lacour
  600          1.00   1.00  3N N      B4-Lewis-Deal vs B1-Franklin-Shaw
   50          0.00   2.00  3 E -1   B2-Bernbaum-Arneill-Brown vs B3-Johnson-Johnson
32 ♠KT9
AT7
AQJ4
♣AQ2
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠AQ43
J
K87
♣J8754
♠-
Q8543
T96532
♣K9
♠J87652
K962
-
♣T63
20
115
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2/1♣ 1/- 3/2 4♠ 4NT
       ♦7/6
EW:  ♣5/4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠3/2 NT3
LoTT: 16 - 18 = -2
Par: +430 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  460          2.00   0.00  3N N +2   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B5-Howe-Lacour
         50    1.00   1.00  4♠ N -1   B4-Lewis-Deal vs B1-Franklin-Shaw
        100    0.00   2.00  4♠ N -2   B2-Bernbaum-Arneill-Brown vs B3-Johnson-Johnson
33 ♠K93
T974
K98
♣Q72
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠T742
KJ3
65
♣KT86
♠A
A5
AQT743
♣AJ93
♠QJ865
Q862
J2
♣54
8
719
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣0 ♦1 ♥4 ♠4 NT1
EW: 7♣ 6 3 3♠ 4NT
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -1440 7♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        130    2.00   0.00  2 E +2   B4-Lewis-Deal vs B1-Franklin-Shaw
        150    1.00   1.00  3 W +2   B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B5-Howe-Lacour
        490    0.00   2.00  3N E +3   B2-Bernbaum-Arneill-Brown vs B3-Johnson-Johnson
34 ♠42
QJ3
8754
♣K752
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠AKT
T84
JT93
♣Q96
♠QJ9863
K9752
6
♣8
♠75
A6
AKQ2
♣AJT43
6
106
18
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 4 1NT  ♥4 ♠4
EW: 3 3/2♠  ♣3 ♦3 NT3
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: +100 4♠*-E/4*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  100          2.00   0.00  4♠ E -2   B4-Lewis-Deal vs B1-Franklin-Shaw
        100    1.00   1.00  2N N -1   B2-Bernbaum-Arneill-Brown vs B3-Johnson-Johnson
        140    0.00   2.00  3♠ E      B6-Carrier-Cathcart vs B5-Howe-Lacour