- Wednesday Aft - January 2, 2019

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Field strength:  Mean: 19 MP  Geomean: 15 MP
(based on 10 players, 6 non ACBL players ignored)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Chris Johnson - Dana Johnson 58.73 1st A 0.48
Bert Fickerson - Ernestine Fickerson 54.76 2nd A 0.34
Bob Deal - Merrily Lewis 52.38 2nd B 0.25
Judy Shaw - Kathy Franklin 51.59 3rd B 0.18
EVENT>49er Pairs               |SESSION>Wednesday Aft|SECTION> B
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>January 2, 2019    |CLUB NO.>131102    | 01/03/2019 01:28
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Chris Gillmon   |RATING>Club Masterpoint (60%, 50%, 30% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   31.5 |TOP>   3 |MP LIMITS>50/20/5        |CLUB>Ventura Unit Bridge Club
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=8/B=7/C=2                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Carol Marquez-Olson    Linda Forsyth            B    .     .     .     28.50  45.24
 2 Miriam Edgar           Katarina Bernbaum        C    .     .     .     30.50  48.41
 3 Ernestine Fickerson    Bert Fickerson           A    2     .     .     34.50  54.76  0.34(A)
 4 Dana Johnson           Chris Johnson            B    1     1     .     37.00  58.73  0.48(A)
 5 Colleen Conway         Jackie Biederman         B    .     .     .     30.00  47.62
 6 Judy Shaw              Kathy Franklin           C    .     3     .     32.50  51.59  0.18(B)
 7 Bob Deal               Merrily Lewis            B    3     2     .     33.00  52.38  0.25(B)
 8 Robert Carrier         Mark Welter              B    .     .     .     26.00  41.27
                                          Totals                         252.00

Hands and Results
1 ♠62
9762
9872
♣KT7
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠J743
JT84
J
♣A863
♠KQT85
KQ5
AT5
♣J2
♠A9
A3
KQ643
♣Q954
3
715
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 2  ♥4 ♠3 NT5
EW: 2 4♠  ♣6 ♦4 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -420 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
   90          3.00   0.00  2 S      B3-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B7-Deal-Lewis
        170    2.00   1.00  3♠ E +1   B5-Conway-Biederman vs B6-Shaw-Franklin
        200    1.00   2.00  3♠ E +2   B8-Carrier-Welter vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
        450    0.00   3.00  4♠ E +1   B2-Edgar-Bernbaum vs B4-Johnson-Johnson
2 ♠AQ84
KQ6
KQJ7
♣KT
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠-
97532
AT9
♣AQ873
♠9653
JT4
52
♣9542
♠KJT72
A8
8643
♣J6
20
101
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4/5 5♠ 3NT  ♣5 ♥6
EW: 1♣  ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT2
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +650 5♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  690          3.00   0.00  3N N +3   B8-Carrier-Welter vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
  660          2.00   1.00  3N N +2   B2-Edgar-Bernbaum vs B4-Johnson-Johnson
  650          0.50   2.50  4♠ S +1   B3-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B7-Deal-Lewis
  650          0.50   2.50  4♠ S +1   B5-Conway-Biederman vs B6-Shaw-Franklin
3 ♠A872
JT6
Q5
♣K854
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠J9
Q7542
A763
♣A6
♠KQ5
K93
KT984
♣Q3
♠T643
A8
J2
♣JT972
10
1113
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1♠  ♦2 ♥2 NT2
EW: 4/5 4/5 1/4NT  ♣6 ♠6
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -650 5-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
         90    3.00   0.00  1N E      B2-Edgar-Bernbaum vs B4-Johnson-Johnson
        140    2.00   1.00  1 W +2   B5-Conway-Biederman vs B6-Shaw-Franklin
        170    1.00   2.00  3 W +1   B3-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B7-Deal-Lewis
        620    0.00   3.00  4 W      B8-Carrier-Welter vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
4 ♠953
AKJ853
A
♣J97
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠AKT
T2
QJT632
♣A4
♠QJ864
964
87
♣T63
♠72
Q7
K954
♣KQ852
13
143
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 4 1NT  ♦5 ♠5
EW: 1 1♠  ♣3 ♥3 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +620 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  170          2.00   1.00  3 N +1   B3-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B5-Conway-Biederman
  170          2.00   1.00  2 N +2   B6-Shaw-Franklin vs B7-Deal-Lewis
  170          2.00   1.00  2 N +2   B8-Carrier-Welter vs B2-Edgar-Bernbaum
  140          0.00   3.00  2 N +1   B4-Johnson-Johnson vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
5 ♠KJT76
K742
832
♣K
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠A932
95
T95
♣Q643
♠-
QJ6
AKQ64
♣J9875
♠Q854
AT83
J7
♣AT2
10
613
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 3♠ 1NT  ♣4 ♦4
EW: 2♣ 2  ♥4 ♠4 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: +140 3♠-NS/3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  150          3.00   0.00  4 E -3   B3-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B5-Conway-Biederman
  140          2.00   1.00  3♠ N      B8-Carrier-Welter vs B2-Edgar-Bernbaum
         90    1.00   2.00  2♣ E      B4-Johnson-Johnson vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
        110    0.00   3.00  2♣ E +1   B6-Shaw-Franklin vs B7-Deal-Lewis
6 ♠8532
JT3
QT
♣AQ74
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠KT9
K752
J64
♣KT3
♠-
AQ94
A97532
♣986
♠AQJ764
86
K8
♣J52
9
1010
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 2♠  ♦3 ♥3 NT4
EW: 4 3  ♣6 ♠5 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 19 = -1
Par: -130 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  200          3.00   0.00  4 W -2   B4-Johnson-Johnson vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
  140          2.00   1.00  3♠ N      B3-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B5-Conway-Biederman
         50    1.00   2.00  3♠ S -1   B6-Shaw-Franklin vs B7-Deal-Lewis
        150    0.00   3.00  4♠ S -3   B8-Carrier-Welter vs B2-Edgar-Bernbaum

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  11
Dbl31Pass3
All pass   

N/S will most likely end up in a contract, though some aggressive E/W pairs might bid to 4. I admit that with two Aces, all the HCP in the long suits and good distribution, I would open the East hand, but it won't be everyone's choice. The South hand is a more clear opening bid if East decides to pass. South will overcall 1 or 2 if East opens, and West will double either of these. If South has overcalled 1, then North has a very familiar hand to readers of my analysis, the "Mixed Raise". A Mixed Raise is a hand with four card support of a known five card suit, 7-9 HCP and usually some shortness and some defense. In other words a hand with four card support that is between a weak hand and a limit raise, but not usually 4333. Experts often use a jump cue bid to show this hand opposite an overcall (i.e. the 3 bid shown in the bidding diagram.) Alternatively, North will bid 3 directly if South has overcalled 2. Will E/W be able to compete to the four level? And if they do, will they make? A 4 contract will be easy, as long as declarer plays a double finesse for the QJ, rather than just playing a to the King. A contract will be a little trickier. However, 4 by East will make unless South leads a to the Queen and North switches to a . It looks like bidding to the four level will be difficult in the face of the N/S bidding in s, and I expect 3 to be a common contract. As long as West never leads a , 3 should go down one trick.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

7 ♠KT93
JT
KQ
♣KJ952
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠Q62
Q752
642
♣A74
♠875
A843
93
♣T863
♠AJ4
K96
AJT875
♣Q
13
84
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 5 2 5♠ 5NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦2 ♥4 ♠1 NT2
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: +660 5NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  630          2.50   0.50  3N N +1   B4-Johnson-Johnson vs B6-Shaw-Franklin
  630          2.50   0.50  3N N +1   B8-Carrier-Welter vs B3-Fickerson-Fickerson
  620          1.00   2.00  4♠ N      B7-Deal-Lewis vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
  600          0.00   3.00  3N S      B5-Conway-Biederman vs B2-Edgar-Bernbaum

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   1
Pass2Pass2
Pass2Pass2NT
Pass3NTAll pass 

N/S should end up in 3NT on this hand, although either partner might end up declaring. South has a normal 1 opening and many North pairs will bid 1 reflexively. However, what will North rebid if South bids 2. On the actual hand, North can rebid 3NT, but if North was stronger, things would get more awkward, and what will . The point here is that when your partner opens a minor and you have a game forcing hand with a four card major and a five card or longer holding in the other minor, it can often be right to bid the other minor first. There will still be time to find a 4-4 major suit fit later. When you have a weaker hand, bidding your major is paramount, but the stronger you are, the more important it is to bid naturally, showing your longer suits first. With a minimum opening bid and a balanced hand, 1 looks ok to me here, as it's unlikely that a slam is the right contract unless South is about to rebid 2. If North does bid 1, then North will end up declaring 3NT. No matter ho declares, the defense will need to get off to a lead to have the best chance. A lead will force declarer to guess s to make more than nine trick, risking their contract in the process. On any other lead, declarer can knock out the Ace and make at least 10 tricks, and might make as many as 11-12 tricks depending on how the play goes when the defense gets in with the Ace. As a lead from both sides is possible, most of the matchpoints will depend on whether declarer decides to play for extra tricks in the suit. At IMPS, +600 would be likely, but at matchpoints, much will depend on how well declarer thinks he can read the opponents discards. +660 will certainly be an excellent result for N/S.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

8 ♠AK4
AK5
K2
♣AK742
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠953
J94
JT5
♣T953
♠Q6
872
A97643
♣Q6
♠JT872
QT63
Q8
♣J8
24
28
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 2 6 6♠ 6NT
EW:  ♣2 ♦4 ♥0 ♠1 NT1
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +990 6NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  460          3.00   0.00  3N N +2   B5-Conway-Biederman vs B2-Edgar-Bernbaum
  400          2.00   1.00  3N N      B7-Deal-Lewis vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
  210          1.00   2.00  2N N +3   B8-Carrier-Welter vs B3-Fickerson-Fickerson
        100    0.00   3.00  6♣ N -2   B4-Johnson-Johnson vs B6-Shaw-Franklin

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
Pass2Pass2
Pass21Pass22
Pass2NT3Pass3
Pass3Pass34
Pass3Pass4
All pass   
  1. Relay to 2
  2. Semi-forced
  3. 24+ HCP
  4. 5 s, 4s

N/S are likely to get to 4 on this hand. Some might end up too high in 6, though this will be rare, as any pair asking for keycards in s will discover that the Queen of trump is missing as well as an Ace. North is easily strong enough to bid 2, but from there the bidding will diverge depending on the N/S agreements. Some pairs will play that 2 shows an immediate game forcing, holding either an Ace, a King or two Queens. After 2, many experts use an agreement known as the "Kokish Relay". Under this agreement, an immediate 2NT bid shows a minimum NT hand of 22-23 or a "bad" 24 HCP. With a better hand such as the North hand here, the 2 bidder bids 2, forcing their partner to bid 2 unless their partner has an unusual hand of their own. Then a 2NT bid shows that North is balanced with 24+ and allows N/S to use all their normal NT agreements at a low level. Without this agreement, North is forced to jump to show a better hand, and now it gets very awkward for South to show minor suit oriented hands or to make slam decisions without getting too high. The benefits are clearly shown on the actual hand, as South is able to show their 5-4 major suit hand (if they are using Puppet Stayman ) and also deny any slam interest. North can respect South's decision, since North knows that South knows that they have 24+ HCP and therefore, South would surely cue bid with the Ace and would bid 3NT with three or four Queens. If North does forge on by asking for keycards, South will deny the trump Queen, and N/S will end up in 5. Slam can make as it happens, but only if declarer plays to drop the trump Queen rather than finessing. If South didn't have the 10, this would be the only play, but here it is better to play to the Queen and finesse.

If North ends up in a NT contract, East will lead a low and declarer should quickly play the Queen. Not only does this allow an immediate finesse, but when the finesse loses, East will be on the spot, knowing that declarer has the King. Good E/W pairs will know that West should show count on the lead when they can't beat the Queen in dummy, and thus East should work out to play the Ace next. Of course, if E/W are playing standard signals, the suit will be blocked, so only E/W pairs who use upside down signaling will have the maximum success against a NT contract.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

9 ♠AKT954
84
9874
♣3
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠Q86
AT52
QJT53
♣4
♠-
KQJ963
-
♣AKJ9872
♠J732
7
AK62
♣QT65
7
914
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 3♠  ♣2 ♥0 NT5
EW: 5♣ 7  ♦5 ♠4 NT5
LoTT: 22 - 20 = +2
Par: -800 7♠*-NS-4
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        100    3.00   0.00  4♠ N -2   B7-Deal-Lewis vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
        150    2.00   1.00  3♣ W +2   B4-Johnson-Johnson vs B6-Shaw-Franklin
        600    1.00   2.00  5♣ E      B8-Carrier-Welter vs B3-Fickerson-Fickerson
        710    0.00   3.00  4 E +3   B5-Conway-Biederman vs B2-Edgar-Bernbaum

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 2414
5Pass5NT2Pass
63Pass7All pass
  1. Two suiter in s and s, game forcing
  2. Asking for trump honors
  3. One of the top three

Good E/W pairs might be able to bid a grand slam in s on this hand, but 6 is a more likely contract, and some might end up in a disastrous 6. North will open 2 at most tables, and the E/W bidding agreements will immediately come into play. Most experts play that a jump to the four level in a minor over a weak two is a convention known as "Leaping Michaels Cue Bid ". It shows a two suited hand holding the minor suit and the other major and is game forcing, including to game in the minor suit. So, the 4 bid by East on this hand is 100% forcing. South can muddy the waters with a 4 bid, but given that East has forced to game opposite nothing, the West hand is easily worth a bid at the five level. In fact, given that West is looking at the Ace, West should be more worried about missing slam than the five level being too high. A vulnerable Leaping Michaels Cue Bid is a very good hand and East is unlikely to have two other quick losers in addition to the Ace. The singleton is a big asset, especially given the four card trump holding. All in all, I really think West should probably jump to 6, over which East should be able to bid 7 with some confidence. However, even if West only bids 5 as shown in the bidding diagram, East can bid 5NT as the "Grand Slam Force" asking West to bid 7 with two of the top three honors. You might be wondering why East would bother doing this, since they know that West can't have two top honors. Most experts will be able to show that they have one top honor by bidding the cheapest suit at the six level, rather than signing off in their suit. This is a less well known part of the Grand Slam Force, but can be highly useful on hands such as this. Overall, I think good pairs can bid the grand, but it won't happen often.

Should South sacrifice over an E/W slam? As long as South trusts the opponents bidding, I think they should. However, holding the AK, most Souths will be reluctant. East's bidding should make it clear that there are no defensive tricks in s or s, but making a slam level sacrifice at this vulnerability. At this vulnerability it should be clear that a contract will make enough tricks to be worth it if the opponents are making. If the opponents bid to 6 and South bids 6 and East now bids 7, South will be in a quandary. 7 is still likely better than having let 6 play, but South will be less certain that 7 is making if the opponents haven't bid it originally. Any South player who correctly diagnoses to make a high level sacrifice will be well rewarded.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

10 ♠AKQ3
AQ73
KT43
♣T
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠T752
T9842
A5
♣J9
♠9864
J
9876
♣8763
♠J
K65
QJ2
♣AKQ542
18
51
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 6 5 5♠ 6NT
EW:  ♣1 ♦1 ♥2 ♠1 NT1
LoTT: 13 - 15 = -2
Par: +1440 6NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  690          3.00   0.00  3N N +3   B5-Conway-Biederman vs B7-Deal-Lewis
  660          1.50   1.50  5N N      B6-Shaw-Franklin vs B3-Fickerson-Fickerson
  660          1.50   1.50  3N N +2   B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B2-Edgar-Bernbaum
        200    0.00   3.00  6N S -2   B8-Carrier-Welter vs B4-Johnson-Johnson
11 ♠3
T3
QJ865
♣Q9863
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠AJ742
QJ5
73
♣JT5
♠KT85
AK874
4
♣A74
♠Q96
962
AKT92
♣K2
5
914
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3  ♣6 ♥2 ♠1 NT2
EW: 5 6♠ 2NT  ♣5 ♦4
LoTT: 21 - 19 = +2
Par: -800 7*-NS-4
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  110          3.00   0.00  3 S      B5-Conway-Biederman vs B7-Deal-Lewis
        170    2.00   1.00  3 E +1   B6-Shaw-Franklin vs B3-Fickerson-Fickerson
        420    1.00   2.00  4 E      B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B2-Edgar-Bernbaum
        450    0.00   3.00  4 E +1   B8-Carrier-Welter vs B4-Johnson-Johnson
12 ♠AK942
Q54
8653
♣A
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠85
A97
Q942
♣Q842
♠QJ7
KJ862
A
♣KJ65
♠T63
T3
KJT7
♣T973
13
815
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 1♠  ♣4/3 ♥3 NT4
EW: 3♣ 3 2NT  ♦6 ♠5
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -140 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
   50          3.00   0.00  4 E -1   B5-Conway-Biederman vs B7-Deal-Lewis
        170    2.00   1.00  2 E +2   B6-Shaw-Franklin vs B3-Fickerson-Fickerson
        420    1.00   2.00  4 E      B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B2-Edgar-Bernbaum
        590    0.00   3.00  4* E     B8-Carrier-Welter vs B4-Johnson-Johnson
13 ♠AKQT
QJ753
53
♣K9
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠8
KT
Q876
♣AT8732
♠53
984
AKJT2
♣Q65
♠J97642
A62
94
♣J4
15
910
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 3♠ 1NT  ♣3 ♦3
EW: 4♣ 4  ♥4 ♠4 NT6
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: -130 4-EW/4♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  170          3.00   0.00  3♠ S +1   B7-Deal-Lewis vs B4-Johnson-Johnson
        100    1.00   2.00  4♠ N -1   B6-Shaw-Franklin vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
        100    1.00   2.00  4 S -1   B2-Edgar-Bernbaum vs B3-Fickerson-Fickerson
        100    1.00   2.00  4 S -1   B8-Carrier-Welter vs B5-Conway-Biederman
14 ♠AJT743
854
K
♣874
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠Q6
AQ3
A6542
♣A95
♠K852
T976
QT
♣K62
♠9
KJ2
J9873
♣QJT3
8
168
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT4
EW: 2♣ 2 3 1/2♠ 3NT
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -400 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
   50          2.50   0.50  2N W -1   B8-Carrier-Welter vs B5-Conway-Biederman
   50          2.50   0.50  3 E -1   B6-Shaw-Franklin vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
        100    1.00   2.00  2♠ N -2   B7-Deal-Lewis vs B4-Johnson-Johnson
        120    0.00   3.00  2N W      B2-Edgar-Bernbaum vs B3-Fickerson-Fickerson
15 ♠K964
A98
954
♣A92
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠AQT8
T743
Q86
♣Q8
♠532
KQJ
A32
♣JT64
♠J7
652
KJT7
♣K753
11
1011
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6
EW: 1♣ 1 1♠ 1NT  ♦6
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -90 1NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
   70          3.00   0.00  1 S      B8-Carrier-Welter vs B5-Conway-Biederman
         80    2.00   1.00  1♠ W      B6-Shaw-Franklin vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
         90    1.00   2.00  1N E      B2-Edgar-Bernbaum vs B3-Fickerson-Fickerson
        100    0.00   3.00  1♣ N -1   B7-Deal-Lewis vs B4-Johnson-Johnson
16 ♠A876
AK
QJT6
♣K74
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠KJ3
8765
987
♣632
♠QT95
94
AK52
♣Q95
♠42
QJT32
43
♣AJT8
17
411
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 3 4 1♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT3
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: +430 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  400          3.00   0.00  3N N      B7-Deal-Lewis vs B2-Edgar-Bernbaum
  200          2.00   1.00  2 S +3   B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B5-Conway-Biederman
  120          0.50   2.50  2N N      B3-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B4-Johnson-Johnson
  120          0.50   2.50  2N N      B8-Carrier-Welter vs B6-Shaw-Franklin
17 ♠Q97642
T94
93
♣A4
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠J5
AKQ3
QJT865
♣7
♠T
72
A42
♣KQJ9852
♠AK83
J865
K7
♣T63
6
1310
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♠ 1NT  ♣2 ♦2 ♥5
EW: 4♣ 4 2  ♠4 NT5
LoTT: 18 - 19 = -1
Par: -130 4-EW/4♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  150          3.00   0.00  3N W -3   B7-Deal-Lewis vs B2-Edgar-Bernbaum
  100          2.00   1.00  5 E -2   B3-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B4-Johnson-Johnson
        150    1.00   2.00  4 W +1   B8-Carrier-Welter vs B6-Shaw-Franklin
        170    0.00   3.00  4♣ E +2   B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B5-Conway-Biederman
18 ♠AJ43
J864
A84
♣64
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠T6
KT7
KQ762
♣AQ5
♠KQ8
A9
JT53
♣KT93
♠9752
Q532
9
♣J872
10
1413
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦2 ♥6 ♠6 NT2
EW: 3♣ 5 1 1♠ 5/4NT
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -460 5NT-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        150    3.00   0.00  3 E +2   B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B5-Conway-Biederman
        170    2.00   1.00  3 W +3   B7-Deal-Lewis vs B2-Edgar-Bernbaum
        400    1.00   2.00  5 W      B8-Carrier-Welter vs B6-Shaw-Franklin
        460    0.00   3.00  3N E +2   B3-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B4-Johnson-Johnson
19 ♠AT
T65
K865
♣KT43
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠KJ985
Q974
7
♣A95
♠Q643
K832
Q2
♣Q86
♠72
AJ
AJT943
♣J72
10
109
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 3 2NT  ♥4 ♠4
EW: 3 2♠  ♣4 ♦3 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 19 = -2
Par: -100 3NT*-NS/4*-NS/4♣*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  110          2.50   0.50  3 S      B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B3-Fickerson-Fickerson
  110          2.50   0.50  3 S      B8-Carrier-Welter vs B7-Deal-Lewis
  100          1.00   2.00  3♠ W -1   B2-Edgar-Bernbaum vs B6-Shaw-Franklin
    PASS       0.00   3.00  Pass Out  B4-Johnson-Johnson vs B5-Conway-Biederman
20 ♠J532
T
A62
♣QT765
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠T
87532
QJT95
♣J2
♠A97
KQ96
K8743
♣4
♠KQ864
AJ4
-
♣AK983
7
412
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 6♠ 2NT  ♦4 ♥4
EW: 2 3/2  ♣1 ♠1 NT2
LoTT: 19 - 20 = -1
Par: +1100 7*-E-4
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  680          3.00   0.00  4♠ S +2   B2-Edgar-Bernbaum vs B6-Shaw-Franklin
  650          2.00   1.00  4♠ S +1   B8-Carrier-Welter vs B7-Deal-Lewis
  200          1.00   2.00  3♠ S +2   B4-Johnson-Johnson vs B5-Conway-Biederman
  170          0.00   3.00  4♣ S +2   B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B3-Fickerson-Fickerson
21 ♠AJ4
KJ3
J74
♣J852
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠Q
AQ7
A96532
♣T64
♠K932
98652
KT
♣K7
♠T8765
T4
Q8
♣AQ93
11
129
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 2♠ 1NT  ♦6 ♥5
EW: 1 -/1  ♣4 ♥6/7 ♠4 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +110 2♠-NS/3♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  150          3.00   0.00  4 E -3   B4-Johnson-Johnson vs B5-Conway-Biederman
  140          2.00   1.00  3♠ S      B2-Edgar-Bernbaum vs B6-Shaw-Franklin
   50          1.00   2.00  2 E -1   B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B3-Fickerson-Fickerson
        200    0.00   3.00  3♠ S -2   B8-Carrier-Welter vs B7-Deal-Lewis