- Wednesday Aft - January 9, 2019

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Field strength:  Mean: 16 MP  Geomean: 11 MP
(based on 10 players, 6 non ACBL players ignored)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Mark Welter - Sally Budd 58.33 1st A 0.24
Bob Deal - Merrily Lewis 57.50 2nd A 0.17
Richard Cathcart - Robert Carrier 55.83 1st A 0.24
Chris Johnson - Dana Johnson 55.00 2nd A 0.17
EVENT>49er Pairs               |SESSION>Wednesday Aft|SECTION> B N-S
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>January 9, 2019    |CLUB NO.>131102    | 01/09/2019 15:21
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Tom Ciacio      |RATING>Club Masterpoint (60%, 50%, 40% Open)|MOVEMENT>MITCHELL
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   30.0 |TOP>   3 |MP LIMITS>50/20/10       |CLUB>Ventura Unit Bridge Club
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=4/B=3/C=1                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Robert Carrier         Richard Cathcart         B    1     1     .     33.50  55.83  0.24(A)
 2 Ernestine Fickerson    Bert Fickerson           A    .     .     .     24.00  40.00
 3 Dana Johnson           Chris Johnson            B    2     .     .     33.00  55.00  0.17(A)
 4 Virginia Celeste       Jo Ann Wedding           C    .     .     .     29.50  49.17
                                          Totals                         120.00

EVENT>49er Pairs               |SESSION>Wednesday Aft|SECTION> B E-W
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
AVE>   30.0 |TOP>   3 |MP LIMITS>50/20/10       |CLUB>Ventura Unit Bridge Club
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=4/B=4/C=3                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Mark Welter            Sally Budd               C    1     1     1     35.00  58.33  0.24(A)
 2 Merrily Lewis          Bob Deal                 B    2     2     .     34.50  57.50  0.17(A)
 3 Carol Howe             Lucien Lacour            C    .     .     .     28.00  46.67
 4 Miriam Edgar           Katarina Bernbaum        C    .     .     .     22.50  37.50
                                          Totals                         120.00

Hands and Results
1 ♠T9852
963
T6
♣A75
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠74
AJT4
AJ542
♣Q4
♠J63
85
8
♣KJT9863
♠AKQ
KQ72
KQ973
♣2
4
125
19
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 2 3♠ 2NT  ♣4
EW: 3♣  ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT5
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +100 4♣*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  110          3.00   0.00  2 S +1   B3-Johnson-Johnson vs B4-Edgar-Bernbaum
         50    2.00   1.00  4♠ N -1   B2-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B2-Lewis-Deal
        100    1.00   2.00  4♠ N -2   B4-Celeste-Wedding vs B3-Howe-Lacour
        110    0.00   3.00  3♣ E      B1-Carrier-Cathcart vs B1-Welter-Budd
2 ♠A4
Q843
J852
♣AJ7
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠QT5
AK652
93
♣932
♠K98762
97
AKQ4
♣K
♠J3
JT
T76
♣QT8654
12
915
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1NT  ♦5 ♥5 ♠2
EW: 2 2 5♠  ♣6 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -450 5♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        200    2.50   0.50  3♠ E +2   B1-Carrier-Cathcart vs B1-Welter-Budd
        200    2.50   0.50  2♠ E +3   B3-Johnson-Johnson vs B4-Edgar-Bernbaum
        450    0.50   2.50  4♠ E +1   B2-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B2-Lewis-Deal
        450    0.50   2.50  4♠ E +1   B4-Celeste-Wedding vs B3-Howe-Lacour
3 ♠52
QJ42
AQJ92
♣64
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠J763
95
743
♣Q987
♠AK94
AT76
T86
♣K3
♠QT8
K83
K5
♣AJT52
10
314
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3 2 3NT  ♠6
EW:  ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT4
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +400 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  430          3.00   0.00  3N S +1   B3-Johnson-Johnson vs B4-Edgar-Bernbaum
  120          2.00   1.00  1N S +1   B4-Celeste-Wedding vs B3-Howe-Lacour
  110          1.00   2.00  3 N      B1-Carrier-Cathcart vs B1-Welter-Budd
        100    0.00   3.00  3♣ S -2   B2-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B2-Lewis-Deal
4 ♠A642
A842
T8
♣K98
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠973
T963
94
♣AJ74
♠Q8
KJ7
J7632
♣T52
♠KJT5
Q5
AKQ5
♣Q63
11
57
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 3 3 5♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦4 ♥4/3 ♠2 NT3
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +650 5♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  650          2.50   0.50  4♠ S +1   B2-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B2-Lewis-Deal
  650          2.50   0.50  4♠ S +1   B4-Celeste-Wedding vs B3-Howe-Lacour
  620          1.00   2.00  4♠ S      B3-Johnson-Johnson vs B4-Edgar-Bernbaum
  200          0.00   3.00  2♠ S +3   B1-Carrier-Cathcart vs B1-Welter-Budd
5 ♠A2
T74
KQ64
♣K642
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠QT96
J652
AJT3
♣Q
♠J3
AK83
872
♣AT87
♠K8754
Q9
95
♣J953
12
1012
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT5
EW: 2 3 1♠ 1NT  ♣6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -140 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
    PASS       3.00   0.00  Pass Out  B3-Johnson-Johnson vs B4-Edgar-Bernbaum
        110    2.00   1.00  2 W      B4-Celeste-Wedding vs B3-Howe-Lacour
        200    1.00   2.00  1 N -2   B1-Carrier-Cathcart vs B1-Welter-Budd
        300    0.00   3.00  1N N -3   B2-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B2-Lewis-Deal
6 ♠AJT95
62
AKQ6
♣K4
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠K72
AKJ85
98
♣AJ7
♠Q4
Q97
7532
♣T852
♠863
T43
JT4
♣Q963
17
164
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 2♠  ♣6 ♥4 NT6
EW: 1♣ 2 1NT  ♦5 ♠4
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +110 2♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
         50    2.50   0.50  3♠ N -1   B1-Carrier-Cathcart vs B4-Edgar-Bernbaum
         50    2.50   0.50  3♠ N -1   B2-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B1-Welter-Budd
        140    0.50   2.50  3 W      B4-Celeste-Wedding vs B2-Lewis-Deal
        140    0.50   2.50  3 E      B3-Johnson-Johnson vs B3-Howe-Lacour

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  PassPass
1NTDblPass2
Pass2All pass 

N/S have the potential to get in trouble after West opens 1NT on this hand. Many North pairs will not have a penalty double available over a strong NT, and North will either pass, show a one suiter and play there or show a two suiter with s and s and end up in either 2 or 2. However, any N/S pair using a good old fashioned penalty double will double with the North hand, and now South will have to decide whether they think they have enough strength to defend, or whether to pull the double and try to land in a making contract. Of course if South passed the double, West might still bid 2 which will put the pressure back on N/S to compete successfully to 2. With E/W making both 1NT and 2 and N/S making 2, there is a lot of pressure on N/S to end up in a contract rather than letting E/W play 1NT or 2 whether doubled or not.

Assuming you ended up declaring a contract as the North player, how did you play the trump suit? If the South hand had two entries, it would be right to play for a double finesse, but with only one entry, what is the correct way to play the suit? There are actually two possibilities, namely to play East for Kx or Qx or to play West for those same holdings. If you decide to play East for the doubleton then you lead the Jack from the North hand. East has to win this, or else the Queen will drop on the next round. Then later in the hand you play a to the Jack and finesse West for the other honor. If you think that West has the doubleton, then you immediately play a to the Jack without touching trump at a all and finesse a through West. Later you can then drop West's now singleton honor.

Given that the right play by declarer holds the losers to one and there are only three side suit losers, you might be wondering how the defense can hold declarer to eight tricks? The key is for East to lead a , which might happen if West has bid the suit. After three rounds of s, when declarer starts trump with the Jack, East can duck, letting West win the King and lead a fourth round of s, allowing East to score the Queen via a trump promotion. For this reason, if the defense starts with three rounds of trump a good declarer will play a to the Jack to start trump, hoping that West has a doubleton, and the defense will just have to be careful to keep declaring from gaining a second dummy entry. Any plus score on this hand should be good for that side, but the best E/W scores will go to those who make a doubled contract.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

7 ♠Q874
AK
J3
♣AK843
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠KJT6
QT63
T94
♣QJ
♠A3
J42
K652
♣T962
♠952
9875
AQ87
♣75
17
98
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2 1 2♠ 1NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT6
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +110 2♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  150          3.00   0.00  1N N +2   B4-Celeste-Wedding vs B2-Lewis-Deal
  110          2.00   1.00  2 N      B3-Johnson-Johnson vs B3-Howe-Lacour
   90          0.50   2.50  1N N      B2-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B1-Welter-Budd
   90          0.50   2.50  2♣ N      B1-Carrier-Cathcart vs B4-Edgar-Bernbaum

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   Pass
Pass1NTAll pass 

After two passes, North will have to decide what to open. As long as the suits aren't both majors (see Board 9), I think it is usually right to open 1NT. Certainly, it helps to have at least one of the two doubletons well stopped, which North does on this hand. With a full 17 count and a good five card suit, the North hand is close to being too strong to open 1NT, but I can't imagine rebidding 2 or 2NT with the North hand if South responds in a red suit, and if the North hand isn't strong enough to force game opposite a minimal response, then a 1NT opening is right. Double dummy, 1NT is the limit of the hand for N/S, but on the layout of the cards, more tricks are possible, as East does not have a good natural lead. A lead from East is particularly hazardous for the defense. Declarer can let this ride to the Jack and then lead three rounds of s. East can win and now what? If West has discarded asking for a , East might lead the Ace and another , but now declarer has an easy path to nine tricks. A continuation by East holds declarer to eight tricks, as does a exit, but only a non- lead and very careful defense from then on will hold declarer to seven tricks. Any N/S pair who score less than +120 will be below average.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

8 ♠JT97
-
QT9765
♣AJ7
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠A84
AKQ8643
A8
♣4
♠K63
JT
K43
♣KT983
♠Q52
9752
J2
♣Q652
8
1710
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣3 ♥1 ♠3 NT1
EW: 3♣ 6 2♠ 6NT  ♦5
LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: -990 6NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        450    2.00   1.00  4 W +1   B1-Carrier-Cathcart vs B4-Edgar-Bernbaum
        450    2.00   1.00  4 W +1   B2-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B1-Welter-Budd
        450    2.00   1.00  4 E +1   B3-Johnson-Johnson vs B3-Howe-Lacour
        480    0.00   3.00  4 W +2   B4-Celeste-Wedding vs B2-Lewis-Deal

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
2Pass2Pass
21Pass22Pass
33Pass4NTPass
54Pass6NTAll pass
  1. Relay (Kokish)
  2. Basically forced
  3. one suiter
  4. 1 or 4 keycards

If West opens 2 on this hand, E/W should have no problems getting to slam. Most players will mark "8.5 Quicktricks" on their convention card, but might still be reluctant to open 2 with only 17 HCP. However, with nine solid tricks in hand, and all suits controlled, it looks like a good opening bid to me. 1 is a little unlikely to get passed out, given that the opponents will have 18+ HCP and shortness if partner can't bid, but the bigger danger of opening 1 and rebidding 4 is that missing slam when partner has the right 8-11 HCP hand. If West opens 2 and East's system bid is 2, then many expert pairs will play an agreement known as "Kokish Relay". Under this agreement, West bids 2 which doesn't yet promise s, but asks East to bid 2. West can then rebid 2NT to show a better than minimum strong balanced hand, rebid 3 to show a one suited hand, or rebid any other suit to show a two suited hand with s and that suit. On this hand, West will rebid 3, and with Kings in all of the other suits, and knowing that West should have a long suit and good cards elsewhere, East can just drive to slam. Holding all of the Kings, East might well bid 6NT at matchpoints. As it happens, 6 is a much better contract, as 6NT requires the Ace onside, but 6 will make if the Ace is onside, or the suit is 4-3, as there are enough entries to the East hand to ruff the suit out unless the opponents lead trump. If West opens 1 and then rebids 4 after East's 1NT bid, does East have enough to bid on to slam? Holding zero key cards in s, it's really hard to see how, perhaps lending some evidence to opening the West hand with 2.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

9 ♠92
JT9
KJ65
♣T852
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠3
642
AQ8743
♣K96
♠AKT75
753
T
♣QJ43
♠QJ864
AKQ8
92
♣A7
5
910
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 1♠ 1NT  ♣6 ♦6
EW: 1♣ 1  ♥5 ♠6 NT6
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +90 1NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  140          3.00   0.00  1♠ S +2   B2-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B1-Welter-Budd
  110          1.50   1.50  1♠ S +1   B3-Johnson-Johnson vs B3-Howe-Lacour
  110          1.50   1.50  2 S      B1-Carrier-Cathcart vs B4-Edgar-Bernbaum
   80          0.00   3.00  1♠ S      B4-Celeste-Wedding vs B2-Lewis-Deal

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 PassPass1
All pass   

The bidding will be short and sweet at many tables. South has the right point count to open 1NT and 5422 distribution in and of itself is not a reason to not open 1NT. However, with both long suits in the majors, and the majority of the HCP also in the majors, I think most experts would choose to open 1. West isn't strong enough to overcall, and without a good fit, it would be risky for North to bid at all. At this vulnerability, it is tempting for North to bid just to try to keep the opponents out of the auction, but with no suit, and no fit, it looks like bidding is just asking for trouble. As it happens, passing will likely work out well, as East has no good bid in balancing seat. On this particular hand, no one can make much of anything, so keeping the bidding low will be key. This will be particularly important for N/S, as they can go for a plus if they play in 1 or set E/W in any contract, but will not be able to go plus in any contract of their own beyond 1. As it happens, 1NT might work out well for N/S as West is likely to lead a . declarer can win the Jack and lead the 9. The best the defense can do is six tricks, and any slip up will give declarer eight tricks. A contract will play similarly. Declarer has more losers, but fewer losers in a contract, and careful play should bring home seven tricks. With the poor break, I think the chances are better for overtricks in a NT contract. Furthermore, North is more likely to bid over a 1 opening than a 1NT opening, but neither of these facts make a 1NT opening with the South hand convincing. If some of the honors were in the minors, it would be much more appealing to open 1NT. Anything +100 or better for N/S should be an excellent result.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

10 ♠KQT752
KT3
862
♣7
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠J
QJ65
AJT973
♣85
♠9863
98
54
♣KJT92
♠A4
A742
KQ
♣AQ643
8
94
19
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 2 4 6♠ 6NT
EW:  ♣4/3 ♦5 ♥2 ♠1 NT1
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +1440 6NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  650          3.00   0.00  4♠ N +1   B1-Carrier-Cathcart vs B4-Edgar-Bernbaum
  180          2.00   1.00  2N S +2   B4-Celeste-Wedding vs B2-Lewis-Deal
  140          1.00   2.00  3 S      B3-Johnson-Johnson vs B3-Howe-Lacour
        200    0.00   3.00  5♠ N -2   B2-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B1-Welter-Budd
11 ♠AK9
T72
Q
♣AKJ876
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠864
QJ8
KT643
♣Q5
♠QT52
K93
A75
♣T94
♠J73
A654
J982
♣32
17
89
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 2 1♠ 3NT  ♦6
EW: 1  ♣3 ♥5 ♠6 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +400 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  150          3.00   0.00  3♣ N +2   B3-Johnson-Johnson vs B2-Lewis-Deal
  130          1.50   1.50  3♣ N +1   B4-Celeste-Wedding vs B1-Welter-Budd
  130          1.50   1.50  2♣ N +2   B1-Carrier-Cathcart vs B3-Howe-Lacour
  110          0.00   3.00  2♣ N +1   B2-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B4-Edgar-Bernbaum
12 ♠AQT
KQ
QJ762
♣K72
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠J86
6
953
♣AJT943
♠K974
AT3
K84
♣Q86
♠532
J987542
AT
♣5
17
612
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 4 1♠ 1NT  ♣5
EW: 2/1♣  ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT3
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +500 5♣*-E-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  630          3.00   0.00  3N N +1   B3-Johnson-Johnson vs B2-Lewis-Deal
  200          2.00   1.00  2 N +3   B2-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B4-Edgar-Bernbaum
  170          1.00   2.00  2 S +2   B1-Carrier-Cathcart vs B3-Howe-Lacour
        100    0.00   3.00  3N N -1   B4-Celeste-Wedding vs B1-Welter-Budd
13 ♠J94
KQ97
J943
♣AT
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠763
J642
AT2
♣J75
♠AK52
A853
KQ8
♣K4
♠QT8
T
765
♣Q98632
11
619
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT5
EW: 1♣ 2 2/3 2♠ 1NT
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -140 3-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  200          3.00   0.00  3N E -2   B1-Carrier-Cathcart vs B3-Howe-Lacour
  100          1.50   1.50  3N E -1   B2-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B4-Edgar-Bernbaum
  100          1.50   1.50  3 W -1   B4-Celeste-Wedding vs B1-Welter-Budd
        800    0.00   3.00  3♣* S -3  B3-Johnson-Johnson vs B2-Lewis-Deal
14 ♠A94
JT962
954
♣T2
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠62
AKQ3
AQT3
♣J76
♠Q873
854
862
♣Q43
♠KJT5
7
KJ7
♣AK985
5
164
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1/2♣ -/1 1/2 2♠ -/1NT
       ♦6/7 NT6/7
EW:  ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT6
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +110 2♠-NS/2-N
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  140          3.00   0.00  2♠ S +1   B1-Carrier-Cathcart vs B3-Howe-Lacour
  100          2.00   1.00  2 W -2   B4-Celeste-Wedding vs B1-Welter-Budd
   90          1.00   2.00  2♣ S      B3-Johnson-Johnson vs B2-Lewis-Deal
         50    0.00   3.00  1N S -1   B2-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B4-Edgar-Bernbaum
15 ♠6
AT97
J872
♣K763
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠AKQ84
K32
K6
♣T94
♠J52
84
T953
♣QJ85
♠T973
QJ65
AQ4
♣A2
8
154
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3 4 1NT  ♠6
EW: 1♠  ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +500 4♠*-EW-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  620          3.00   0.00  4 N      B1-Carrier-Cathcart vs B3-Howe-Lacour
  170          2.00   1.00  3 S +1   B2-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B4-Edgar-Bernbaum
  120          1.00   2.00  1N S +1   B4-Celeste-Wedding vs B1-Welter-Budd
   90          0.00   3.00  1N N      B3-Johnson-Johnson vs B2-Lewis-Deal
16 ♠KQ4
AQ532
KT72
♣7
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠A75
84
AQ653
♣QT9
♠J9832
KJ
J98
♣J86
♠T6
T976
4
♣AK5432
14
127
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 1 4 1NT  ♠6
EW: 1♠  ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +420 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  420          3.00   0.00  4 N      B4-Celeste-Wedding vs B4-Edgar-Bernbaum
  170          1.50   1.50  2 N +2   B2-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B3-Howe-Lacour
  170          1.50   1.50  2 N +2   B3-Johnson-Johnson vs B1-Welter-Budd
         50    0.00   3.00  4 N -1   B1-Carrier-Cathcart vs B2-Lewis-Deal
17 ♠AK72
T73
7432
♣Q4
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠T983
AKJ9
AT
♣KJ5
♠Q5
Q84
QJ65
♣T862
♠J64
652
K98
♣A973
9
167
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT5
EW: 3♣ 2 2 2♠ 2NT
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
         90    3.00   0.00  1N W      B1-Carrier-Cathcart vs B2-Lewis-Deal
        110    2.00   1.00  2 W      B3-Johnson-Johnson vs B1-Welter-Budd
        120    1.00   2.00  2N W      B4-Celeste-Wedding vs B4-Edgar-Bernbaum
        150    0.00   3.00  1N W +2   B2-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B3-Howe-Lacour
18 ♠A983
K3
K9765
♣62
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠Q
J852
QT8
♣AKQT7
♠KJ4
AT74
AJ2
♣J95
♠T7652
Q96
43
♣843
10
1414
2
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦4 ♥2 ♠5 NT2
EW: 5♣ 3 5 2♠ 5NT
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -460 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
   50          3.00   0.00  5 W -1   B1-Carrier-Cathcart vs B2-Lewis-Deal
        150    2.00   1.00  3♣ E +2   B3-Johnson-Johnson vs B1-Welter-Budd
        200    1.00   2.00  3 W +2   B4-Celeste-Wedding vs B4-Edgar-Bernbaum
        450    0.00   3.00  4 W +1   B2-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B3-Howe-Lacour
19 ♠854
983
JT93
♣975
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠AJT32
AK74
62
♣J6
♠Q976
Q2
84
♣AT842
♠K
JT65
AKQ75
♣KQ3
1
138
18
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣3 ♥4 ♠2 NT4
EW: 3♣ 3 4♠ 2NT  ♦5
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -500 5*-NS-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        140    3.00   0.00  3♠ W      B2-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B3-Howe-Lacour
        170    2.00   1.00  3♠ W +1   B4-Celeste-Wedding vs B4-Edgar-Bernbaum
        200    1.00   2.00  3♠ W +2   B3-Johnson-Johnson vs B1-Welter-Budd
        620    0.00   3.00  4♠ W      B1-Carrier-Cathcart vs B2-Lewis-Deal
20 ♠532
AJ92
T
♣A8643
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠Q764
63
AK852
♣J2
♠JT
854
J94
♣KT975
♠AK98
KQT7
Q763
♣Q
9
105
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 4 3♠ 1NT  ♦6
EW: 1  ♣5 ♥3 ♠4 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +620 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  620          3.00   0.00  4 S      B4-Celeste-Wedding vs B4-Edgar-Bernbaum
  600          2.00   1.00  3N N      B1-Carrier-Cathcart vs B2-Lewis-Deal
  170          1.00   2.00  3 N +1   B2-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B3-Howe-Lacour
  140          0.00   3.00  2♠ S +1   B3-Johnson-Johnson vs B1-Welter-Budd