- Wednesday Aft - April 10, 2019

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 31 32 33 34
Field strength:  Mean: 22 MP  Geomean: 17 MP
(based on 5 players, 7 non ACBL players ignored)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Bert Fickerson - Ernestine Fickerson 67.50 1st A 0.36
Richard Cathcart - Robert Carrier 58.75 2nd A 0.25
Bob Deal - Lynn Arneill-Brown 51.25 2nd B 0.14
EVENT>49er Pairs               |SESSION>Wednesday Aft|SECTION> B
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>April 10, 2019     |CLUB NO.>131102    | 04/10/2019 15:42
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Tom Ciacio      |RATING>Club Masterpoint (60%, 50%, 40% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   20.0 |TOP>   2 |MP LIMITS>50/20/10       |CLUB>Ventura Unit Bridge Club
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=6/B=4/C=3                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Bert Fickerson         Ernestine Fickerson      A    1     .     .     27.00  67.50  0.36(A)
 2 Kathy Franklin         Eleanor Syrett           C    .     .     .     15.50  38.75
 3 Robert Carrier         Richard Cathcart         C    2     1     1     23.50  58.75  0.25(A)
 4 Bob Deal               Lynn Arneill-Brown       B    .     2     .     20.50  51.25  0.14(B)
 5 Marc Welter            Nancy Bejuene            C    .     .     .     13.00  32.50
 6 Dana Johnson           Chris Johnson            A    .     .     .     20.50  51.25
                                          Totals                         120.00

Hands and Results
1 ♠AT95
Q98
J
♣K8753
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠Q876
AKJ4
Q76
♣QJ
♠J32
763
AT9852
♣6
♠K4
T52
K43
♣AT942
10
155
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 1 2♠ 2NT  ♦5
EW: 2  ♣3 ♥6 ♠5 NT4
LoTT: 18 - 19 = -1
Par: +130 4♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  130          2.00   0.00  2♣ S +2   B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
  100          1.00   1.00  3 W -2   B2-Franklin-Syrett vs B4-Deal-Arneill-Brown
   50          0.00   2.00  2 W -1   B3-Carrier-Cathcart vs B5-Welter-Bejuene

Michael Berkowitz Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 PassPass1
Dbl12Pass
Pass33Pass
Pass4All pass 

This auction could go a number of ways depending on style. North might open 1, East might open 2 (the 1098 of diamonds are the reason to consider this) and South might pass in 3rd seat. That said, I've shown the auction that would happen if I were sitting at all three seats today. I might have a different auction if I picked tomorrow. After 1, West has enough for a takeout double even with the revolting QJ of clubs. North should still bid 1 even though your RHO has shown some spades. East knows that her side has a nine-card fit and should bid 2. South has bid enough and so has West. North now shows her club support by bidding 3. East follows the LAW of Total Tricks and bids 3 with a 9-card fit. North doesn't want to defend three diamonds and tries 4. Those partnerships playing Support Doubles will have a safer knowledge that South will have a decent club fit since South's pass of 2 will deny having three spades.

4 is not exactly a laydown (the location of the J is favorable) but with 10 trumps, and the A onside South shouldn't have any problems taking 10 tricks.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at michael@larryco.com

2 ♠AQT2
JT8
QT75
♣54
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠875
KQ54
9862
♣J8
♠KJ6
9763
A
♣AKQT2
♠943
A2
KJ43
♣9763
9
617
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 ♠6 NT4
EW: 3♣ 5 1♠ 2NT  ♦6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -450 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        140    2.00   0.00  3 E      B3-Carrier-Cathcart vs B5-Welter-Bejuene
        170    0.50   1.50  3 W +1   B2-Franklin-Syrett vs B4-Deal-Arneill-Brown
        170    0.50   1.50  1 E +3   B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson

Michael Berkowitz Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  1Pass
1Pass3All pass

East picks up a hand with 17HCP and a nice five-card suit, but you shouldn't get yourself locked into a hand evaluation when you pick up your hand. How good a hand is, especially a hand with lots of shape, will depend on how the auction proceeds. If partner bids diamonds, how happy would you be? Regardless, we know that we'll start with 1 and see what develops. West should definitely bid, and she should not bid diamonds but hearts. This style of bidding is known as Walsh style and it prioritizes showing majors as the responder with only one bid (not enough points to reverse later). Walsh style allows the opening bidder to rebid notrump with balanced hands. A 1 response might get East excited, but the location of honors matters. If theA was in hearts, I might jump to four, but at matchpoints and with such poor trump, a 3 bid seems high enough, this is one of those "3 and a half" heart bids.

The lie of the cards is very fortunate for declarer who can manage to lose only one spade and one heart. On a diamond lead, declarer should win in dummy and play a trump to the K. Now declarer has to guess what to do--ruffing a diamond and playing another heart might work (although it could be bad if your North was good enough to hold up on the first round of trump). Playing for Ax by leading a low trump out of hand could be right (and might be safer). With the hearts behaving and spade entries all paths should lead to a lot of tricks.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at michael@larryco.com

3 ♠AQT8
KT852
53
♣43
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠J
QJ43
KJ92
♣A875
♠K2
A9
QT764
♣QT96
♠976543
76
A8
♣KJ2
9
1211
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 2♠  ♣3 ♦3 NT5
EW: 4♣ 3 1NT  ♥6 ♠5
LoTT: 17 - 19 = -2
Par: -130 4♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  110          2.00   0.00  2♠ S      B3-Carrier-Cathcart vs B5-Welter-Bejuene
        130    1.00   1.00  3 E +1   B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
        150    0.00   2.00  3 W +2   B2-Franklin-Syrett vs B4-Deal-Arneill-Brown

Michael Berkowitz Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   Pass
112Pass
3All pass  

On board 2, I mentioned the importance of the location of honors. This South hand is another example--if you blindly think of a weak two-bid as "5-10 points and a six-card suit" you might open 2. Please don't. While we are well past the days of needing "two of the top three honors" or "three out of the top five" to preempt, you should still be telling partner about a suit that doesn't embarrass you. K109xxx is a reasonable suit or Q1098xx, but 976543 is NOT. West opens 1 and North overcalls 1 not worrying about the other major. East has a hand that is too good for a simple raise, so should cuebid to show a good hand in support of diamonds. South has nothing to add and West is reasonably happy about diamonds, but can't like the looks of the QJ of hearts so she might show a minimum by bidding 3 (if she cooperates with 3, East should probably sign off in 3). That will likely end the auction.

South will lead partner's heart suit. This is another hand where the double-dummy shows that diamonds should be held to nine tricks, but real defenders will likely allow more. The play of the club suit is interesting--low to the ace and low towards the Q109 results in a guess. Better is to play for South to have one of the honors. If you lead the 10 (or Q) and run it, you will take three tricks in the suit if South has the K or the J.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at michael@larryco.com

4 ♠T976
K643
854
♣J9
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠QJ
AQJ752
6
♣AKT2
♠532
98
QJ73
♣8764
♠AK84
T
AKT92
♣Q53
4
173
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 4♠ 3NT  ♣5 ♥5
EW: 2/1♣ 1  ♦4 ♠3 NT4/3
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: +620 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  140          2.00   0.00  2♠ S +1   B3-Carrier-Cathcart vs B5-Welter-Bejuene
        110    1.00   1.00  2 W      B2-Franklin-Syrett vs B4-Deal-Arneill-Brown
        140    0.00   2.00  3 W      B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson

Michael Berkowitz Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
1PassPassDbl
3PassPassDbl
Pass3All pass 

West opens 1 and North and East both pass. South has a big hand and a good shape for a takeout double. West has a good enough hand to jump-rebid 3. Two more passes and South's hand is worth another double. Now North might consider passing, but the heart spots (non-honor cards) are bad and Wests are always 7-4 when I choose to pass. With four spades, bidding 3 seems reasonable. South and West have both bid enough and that will likely be our final contract.

East will lead a heart and then West will win the ace and be unhappy. She can try the K to see if partner might be about to ruff a club, but partner should discourage. Now nothing seems great and she might try a trump or just cashing out her clubs. Declarer doesn't have the entries to take a spade finesse so will pick up the QJ. After a club honor is cashed, declarer should play on clubs to pitch diamonds from her hand. Ultimately, the play will be complicated and likely different at each table. The double dummy of 4 seems unlikely but on hands like this anything could happen.

If North had chosen to pass 3 doubled, the North-South pair would collect 200 and a likely good score.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at michael@larryco.com

5 ♠J52
K75
AQ72
♣T72
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠AT73
AQT9
93
♣AJ5
♠Q94
J82
K6
♣KQ964
♠K86
643
JT854
♣83
10
1511
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT3
EW: 4♣ 1 4 4♠ 2NT
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -420 4♠-EW/4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        110    2.00   0.00  2 W      B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B2-Franklin-Syrett
        130    1.00   1.00  3♣ W +1   B3-Carrier-Cathcart vs B4-Deal-Arneill-Brown
        400    0.00   2.00  3N W      B5-Welter-Bejuene vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson

Michael Berkowitz Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 PassPassPass
1NTPass3NTAll pass

I would never open the North hand, but I might open the East hand on some days. The favorable vulnerability could goad me to do it, but we'll display what I think is the majority action (pass). Third seat is a good time to be aggressive, but red against white and with no good suit, South passes. West bids 1NT and East, if they play Puppet Stayman (a way of finding if opener has a 5-card major) can bid that or bid 3NT otherwise.

North has an annoying lead. After 1NT-3NT, I prefer to lead a major. On this hand you know that partner isn't going to have much (5 points assuming the opponents have 25) so you might try being very passive and leading a club. You might also hope that leading a diamond (fourth best) might be the best chance to beat the contract. The lead winds up determining whether the contract makes or goes down one. I don't think I would lead a diamond, but hats off to you if you did.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at michael@larryco.com

6 ♠63
5
Q9763
♣K7543
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠52
T9732
KT842
♣8
♠AT84
AQJ
A5
♣AJT2
♠KQJ97
K864
J
♣Q96
5
320
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1/-♣  ♣7/6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT5
EW: 2 3 1♠ 2/1NT  ♣6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -140 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  200          1.00   1.00  3N E -2   B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B2-Franklin-Syrett
  200          1.00   1.00  4 E -2   B3-Carrier-Cathcart vs B4-Deal-Arneill-Brown
  200          1.00   1.00  3 E -2   B5-Welter-Bejuene vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
7 ♠KT5
QT854
T76
♣95
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠762
J9762
K9
♣AKT
♠A
AK3
AQJ53
♣QJ86
♠QJ9843
-
842
♣7432
5
1121
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣1 ♦1 ♥2 ♠5 NT1
EW: 6♣ 6 5 2♠ 6NT
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -1440 6NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  200          2.00   0.00  4 E -2   B3-Carrier-Cathcart vs B4-Deal-Arneill-Brown
        170    1.00   1.00  2 E +4   B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B2-Franklin-Syrett
        190    0.00   2.00  3♣ E +4   B5-Welter-Bejuene vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
8 ♠A6542
QJ
KT32
♣T4
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠7
AT52
AQ6
♣AQ765
♠QJT3
K976
9
♣KJ83
♠K98
843
J8754
♣92
10
1610
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣1 ♦6 ♥1 ♠5 NT3
EW: 6♣ -/1 6 1/2♠ 4NT
       ♦6/7
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -980 6-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        170    2.00   0.00  2♣ W +4   B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B2-Franklin-Syrett
        450    0.50   1.50  4 W +1   B5-Welter-Bejuene vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
        450    0.50   1.50  4 E +1   B3-Carrier-Cathcart vs B4-Deal-Arneill-Brown
9 ♠Q732
A3
K932
♣A52
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠9864
J74
T7
♣K983
♠KJ
KT952
QJ6
♣QT7
♠AT5
Q86
A854
♣J64
13
412
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3 3♠ 2NT  ♥6
EW: 1  ♣6 ♦4 ♠4 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  130          2.00   0.00  2 N +2   B1-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B2-Franklin-Syrett
         50    0.50   1.50  3N S -1   B4-Deal-Arneill-Brown vs B5-Welter-Bejuene
         50    0.50   1.50  3 S -1   B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B3-Carrier-Cathcart
10 ♠4
KJT8
A762
♣KT54
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠QJT972
A53
T
♣J92
♠A86
Q764
QJ4
♣A87
♠K53
92
K9853
♣Q63
11
813
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 3 1  ♠5 NT6
EW: 2♠  ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: +110 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  100          1.50   0.50  4♠ W -1   B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B3-Carrier-Cathcart
  100          1.50   0.50  3♠ W -1   B4-Deal-Arneill-Brown vs B5-Welter-Bejuene
        110    0.00   2.00  2♠ W      B1-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B2-Franklin-Syrett
11 ♠6
K76
AJT3
♣KT743
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠-
T842
K865
♣AQJ95
♠K2
AQJ53
Q42
♣862
♠AQJT987543
9
97
♣-
11
1012
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♠ 1NT  ♣4 ♦4 ♥3
EW: 3♣ 3 4  ♠2 NT2
LoTT: 21 - 20 = +1
Par: +300 6*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  450          1.50   0.50  4♠ S +1   B1-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B2-Franklin-Syrett
  450          1.50   0.50  4♠ S +1   B4-Deal-Arneill-Brown vs B5-Welter-Bejuene
  420          0.00   2.00  4♠ S      B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B3-Carrier-Cathcart
12 ♠QJT2
QJ5
K54
♣AJ5
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠84
AKT63
A973
♣64
♠9765
872
T
♣KQ987
♠AK3
94
QJ862
♣T32
14
115
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 1♠ 1NT  ♣6 ♥4
EW: 1♣ 3  ♦5 ♠5 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -140 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  170          2.00   0.00  2♠ N +2   B1-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B2-Franklin-Syrett
  140          1.00   1.00  1♠ N +2   B4-Deal-Arneill-Brown vs B5-Welter-Bejuene
  110          0.00   2.00  2♠ N      B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B3-Carrier-Cathcart
13 ♠Q54
KJ72
T94
♣KT6
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠T7
QT9543
K
♣A732
♠AJ63
6
AQJ82
♣Q54
♠K982
A8
7653
♣J98
9
914
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT4
EW: 3♣ 3 3 2♠ 2NT
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -140 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
         80    2.00   0.00  1♠ E      B5-Welter-Bejuene vs B2-Franklin-Syrett
         90    1.00   1.00  2 E      B1-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B3-Carrier-Cathcart
        600    0.00   2.00  3N W      B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B4-Deal-Arneill-Brown
14 ♠QT3
85
87
♣AQ8542
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠A642
T
AK53
♣K976
♠K97
A96432
T64
♣T
♠J85
KQJ7
QJ92
♣J3
8
147
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT6
EW: 1♣ 2 2/1 2♠  NT6
LoTT: 14 - 15 = -1
Par: -110 2♠-EW/2-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  500          2.00   0.00  4* E -3  B1-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B3-Carrier-Cathcart
   50          1.00   1.00  2 E -1   B5-Welter-Bejuene vs B2-Franklin-Syrett
        140    0.00   2.00  1♠ W +2   B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B4-Deal-Arneill-Brown
15 ♠J53
J
AK754
♣AKQT
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠62
KQ9765
T9
♣862
♠AKQT4
T
J63
♣J753
♠987
A8432
Q82
♣94
18
511
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 3 2♠ 2NT  ♥6
EW:  ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 ♠5 NT3
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +120 2NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  110          1.50   0.50  3 N      B1-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B3-Carrier-Cathcart
  110          1.50   0.50  3 N      B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B4-Deal-Arneill-Brown
   50          0.00   2.00  2♠ E -1   B5-Welter-Bejuene vs B2-Franklin-Syrett
16 ♠K
75
AKT8543
♣873
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠QT52
AT2
J2
♣AKQ6
♠974
Q9843
Q
♣T952
♠AJ863
KJ6
976
♣J4
10
164
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 2NT  ♣4 ♥4 ♠6
EW: 2♣ 3  ♦3 ♠6 NT5
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: +130 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  150          2.00   0.00  3 N +2   B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B4-Deal-Arneill-Brown
  130          0.50   1.50  4 N      B5-Welter-Bejuene vs B2-Franklin-Syrett
  130          0.50   1.50  3 N +1   B1-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B3-Carrier-Cathcart
31 ♠Q53
T
K8752
♣QT96
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠JT86
AJ3
QJ4
♣AJ8
♠A94
Q9642
96
♣K43
♠K72
K875
AT3
♣752
7
149
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣6 ♥4 ♠5/4 NT4
EW: 1♣ 3 2♠ 2NT  ♦6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -140 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  150          2.00   0.00  4 E -3   B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B5-Welter-Bejuene
   50          0.50   1.50  4 E -1   B4-Deal-Arneill-Brown vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
   50          0.50   1.50  3 E -1   B2-Franklin-Syrett vs B3-Carrier-Cathcart
32 ♠653
AJT942
QJ6
♣8
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠QJT98742
K
52
♣A4
♠-
Q8765
K987
♣Q972
♠AK
3
AT43
♣KJT653
8
107
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 3 4/3 3NT  ♠6
EW: 1♠  ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 NT3
LoTT: 17 - 15 = +2
Par: +420 4-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  800          2.00   0.00  4♠* W -3  B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B5-Welter-Bejuene
  200          1.00   1.00  3♠ W -2   B2-Franklin-Syrett vs B3-Carrier-Cathcart
  100          0.00   2.00  3♠ W -1   B4-Deal-Arneill-Brown vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
33 ♠AK987
J
AQJ87
♣82
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠Q
KQT982
K53
♣KQ9
♠J64
65
42
♣AJ7654
♠T532
A743
T96
♣T3
15
156
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 4♠ 1NT  ♣4 ♥4
EW: 2♣ 2  ♦3 ♠3 NT5
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +420 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  200          2.00   0.00  3♠ N +2   B4-Deal-Arneill-Brown vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
  140          0.50   1.50  3♠ N      B2-Franklin-Syrett vs B3-Carrier-Cathcart
  140          0.50   1.50  3♠ N      B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B5-Welter-Bejuene
34 ♠K7
AKJ75
AT3
♣KJ4
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠J96
QT943
Q98
♣Q3
♠AT543
86
K7
♣AT82
♠Q82
2
J6542
♣9765
19
711
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 3 1 1/-NT
       ♠6 NT7/6
EW: 1♠ -/1NT
       ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 NT6/7
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +110 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
   50          2.00   0.00  2♠ E -1   B2-Franklin-Syrett vs B3-Carrier-Cathcart
        100    1.00   1.00  2 N -1   B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B5-Welter-Bejuene
        300    0.00   2.00  3N N -3   B4-Deal-Arneill-Brown vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson