- Thursday Aft - June 27, 2019

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Field strength:  Mean: 320 MP  Geomean: 62 MP
(based on 11 players, 1 non ACBL player ignored)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Barbara Fitzgerald - Susan Lang 69.57 1st A 0.48
Iris Acutt - Kay Mendel 56.52 2nd A 0.34
EVENT>Open Pairs (300/200/100)               |SESSION>Thursday Aft |SECTION> B
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>June 27, 2019      |CLUB NO.>131102    | 06/27/2019 18:24
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Bob Gruber      |RATING>Club Masterpoint (80%, 70%, 60% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   23.0 |TOP>   2 |MP LIMITS>300/200/100    |CLUB>Ventura Unit Bridge Club
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=6/B=5/C=3                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Iris Acutt             Kay Mendel               C    2     2     1     26.00  56.52  0.34(A)
 2 Rosemary Reitz         Nancy Hall               A    NE    .     .     22.00  47.83
 3 Patricia Torres        Miki Thompson            C    .     .     .     21.00  45.65
 4 Jim Cooke              Dolores Mattox           C    .     .     .     15.50  33.70
 5 Jeffrey Steward        Ray Escobedo             B    .     .     .     21.50  46.74
 6 Barbara Fitzgerald     Susan Lang               B    1     1     .     32.00  69.57  0.48(A)
                                          Totals                         138.00

Hands and Results
1 ♠T5
QJ2
KJT72
♣T54
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠KJ9862
975
8
♣KQ7
♠AQ3
KT6
AQ6
♣AJ82
♠74
A843
9543
♣963
7
920
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣0 ♦5 ♥4 ♠1 NT1
EW: 6/5♣ 2 3 6/5♠ 6/5NT
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: -990 6NT-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        450    2.00   0.00  4♠ W +1   B2-Reitz-Hall vs B4-Cooke-Mattox
        480    1.00   1.00  4♠ E +2   B3-Torres-Thompson vs B5-Steward-Escobedo
        980    0.00   2.00  6♠ E      B6-Fitzgerald-Lang vs B1-Acutt-Mendel

Larry Cohen Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 Pass2NTPass
3Pass3Pass
4Pass6All pass

This auction shown relies on Texas transfers. "But Larry," you say, "you didn't use a Texas transfer." One of the most important parts of playing Texas is that when you choose to transfer and then bid game in the same suit, you are showing a hand that is mildly invitational to slam. Here the West hand doesn't have enough to insist on slam, but would like to be in slam if partner has some aces and some spades. The East hand has some aces and some spades and should bid slam. Asking for keycards here will just give your opponents a chance to make a lead-directing double as it's unlikely partner has no keycards and interest in slam.

The lead for South is far from clear. I hate to lay down aces against slam, although finding partner with the K is possible. It turns out to matter a lot, as declarer has only 11 tricks unless a red suit is led. On a black-suit lead, declarer would need to guess to finesse in diamonds to make the contract, and there's no reason to do that. The best line is to try dropping the doubleton K (unlikely, but possible) and then hoping that the A is onside after pitching a heart on a club.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at bridgecruises_lessons@larryco.com

2 ♠K9752
8
K864
♣AQ7
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠-
A754
AJT75
♣J852
♠AJ43
63
Q92
♣T963
♠QT86
KQJT92
3
♣K4
12
107
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3/4 3♠ 2NT  ♣5 ♦5
EW: 1♣ 1  ♥3 ♠3 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +620 4-N
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  620          2.00   0.00  4♠ N      B6-Fitzgerald-Lang vs B1-Acutt-Mendel
        100    0.50   1.50  4♠ N -1   B2-Reitz-Hall vs B4-Cooke-Mattox
        100    0.50   1.50  4♠ N -1   B3-Torres-Thompson vs B5-Steward-Escobedo

Larry Cohen Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  Pass1
2234
All pass   

South opens 1 with a shapely hand. West's overcall is borderline, but partner is a passed hand and the vulnerability is favorable. It's best to bid now to stop partner from doing something bad like making a delayed preempt in spades. North bids 2 with a strong hand and East supports with support. 3 would be non-forcing, and although the South hand wasn't the strongest to start out, it has become much better with the auction and should bid game.

The play in 4 is difficult due to the bad trump split. On a diamond lead and continuation, declarer will have some difficulty handling the trump suit. If West doesn't bid 2, East may very well lead a club, in which case declarer should pitch a diamond on a club and probably make in spite of the bad spade split. Aggressive overcalling can make the auction harder for the opponents, and it also makes defending much easier for partner so consider doing it more frequently.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at bridgecruises_lessons@larryco.com

3 ♠A65
AK83
974
♣AJT
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠KQ932
QJT2
KJ
♣Q2
♠T8
976
AQ65
♣K984
♠J74
54
T832
♣7653
16
149
1
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT4
EW: 1♣ 1 3 1♠ 2/3NT
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: -600 3NT-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  200          2.00   0.00  3N E -2   B2-Reitz-Hall vs B4-Cooke-Mattox
        100    1.00   1.00  1N N -2   B3-Torres-Thompson vs B5-Steward-Escobedo
        120    0.00   2.00  1N E +1   B6-Fitzgerald-Lang vs B1-Acutt-Mendel

Larry Cohen Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   Pass
11NTDblAll pass

West opens 1. Don't upgrade to notrump with 9 cards in the majors or with a hand with such weak values (queens and jacks). North's 1NT call would anger my former partner, David Berkowitz, who hates bidding notrump with Axx. He would have doubled, and that would have worked out much better. East's double is a bit aggressive, but partner's vulnerable opening should show real values and East knows what he will lead against 1NTx. Knowing your lead should be a factor when you consider whether to penalize your opponents.

North won't have much fun playing this hand. It's hard to see declarer winning more than the four tricks owed him, though East-West may have some difficulty discarding on their winners (a good problem to have as a defender). One of the great pleasures in bridge is to double your opponents for 500 or 800 when you don't have a game. Don't make the mistake of pulling to 2 with the West hand as you are unlikely to find a game, and if partner thinks you are beating 1NT, your extra values will be a nice bonus for defense.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at bridgecruises_lessons@larryco.com

4 ♠AQ643
AQT8
A86
♣Q
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠8
KJ
KJT95432
♣K5
♠K2
9542
Q7
♣AJ987
♠JT975
763
-
♣T6432
18
1110
1
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 2 5♠  ♦3 NT3
EW: 3/4  ♣6 ♥4 ♠2 NT5
LoTT: 21 - 20 = +1
Par: +500 6*-W-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  650          2.00   0.00  4♠ N +1   B2-Reitz-Hall vs B4-Cooke-Mattox
  500          1.00   1.00  5* W -2  B3-Torres-Thompson vs B5-Steward-Escobedo
  200          0.00   2.00  5* W -1  B6-Fitzgerald-Lang vs B1-Acutt-Mendel

Larry Cohen Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
11Dbl4
5DblAll pass 

These high-level competitive auctions are always difficult. West is too strong to start preemptively, so he should open 1. North has a maximum overcall, but I would bid 1 to start. If the minors were reversed, I would double. East makes a Negative Double and then South has to decide what to do. The South hand's distribution makes it worth 4, even vulnerable. West now bids 5. North might think about 5, but the Negative Double behind those hearts makes double seem a better choice.

Unlike Board 3, this time the doubler has no appealing opening lead. If North tries to do anything too cute, he might not wind up with all of his tricks. As it is, the defense is only entitled to three aces. East-West should be happy about the result since North-South can make a lot of spades. This is a good hand to be fearless. Anyone who sold out to a diamond part score or spade game will get a bad result.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at bridgecruises_lessons@larryco.com

5 ♠QJ8
QT8753
T74
♣2
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠K973
96
AK93
♣KQJ
♠T62
K42
85
♣AT974
♠A54
AJ
QJ62
♣8653
5
167
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣4 ♦5 ♠4/5 NT4
EW: 3♣ 1 2♠ 2NT  ♥5
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
         90    2.00   0.00  2♣ E      B6-Fitzgerald-Lang vs B1-Acutt-Mendel
        130    1.00   1.00  2♣ E +2   B3-Torres-Thompson vs B5-Steward-Escobedo
        200    0.00   2.00  3* N -1  B2-Reitz-Hall vs B4-Cooke-Mattox

Larry Cohen Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 PassPass1
1NT2PassPass
DblPass3All pass

I don't like preempting aggressively when vulnerable. It's too easy to go minus 200 when your opponents belong in a partscore so I would pass the North hand to begin. After two passes, South will open with 1 and West should overcall 1NT with 16 HCP and diamonds controlled. North can now bid 2. I wouldn't do this with the minors the other way around, but if partner has long diamonds, you can escape to 3 should things go wrong. Depending on methods, East might be able to use lebensohl , but playing standard, 3 would show too good of a hand. South passes and West should balance with a takeout double which allows East to bid 3, ending the auction.

South doesn't have a standout lead, and might try either minor (or even an aggressive lead of the A). If South leads passively (not the A) then declarer has to make a lot of guesses. The Q looks like it could be from QJ10, which would be my lead regardless of partner's bidding. Still, there's a slight inference about the A--that it could be in South. The auction also points to South having the majority of the points, although third seat openers could be a little lighter than normal. Whatever you decide, it's important to have a plan for the hearts before drawing trump. This is a board where finding a plus will be a good result for either side.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at bridgecruises_lessons@larryco.com

6 ♠4
J7
AQJ986
♣KT97
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠32
AQT862
KT5
♣Q3
♠AK87
5
732
♣A8652
♠QJT965
K943
4
♣J4
11
1111
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♠ 1NT  ♣5 ♦6 ♥5
EW: 1♣ 2  ♦6 ♠6 NT6
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: -100 2NT*-NS/2♠*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        100    2.00   0.00  4 N -2   B6-Fitzgerald-Lang vs B2-Reitz-Hall
        170    1.00   1.00  3 W +1   B5-Steward-Escobedo vs B1-Acutt-Mendel
        500    0.00   2.00  4♠* S -3  B3-Torres-Thompson vs B4-Cooke-Mattox
7 ♠AQT
AJ876
A
♣7643
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠J64
QT3
KT86
♣KT2
♠8732
92
Q9542
♣95
♠K95
K54
J73
♣AQJ8
15
92
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 6♣ 1 6 3♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣1 ♦6 ♥1 ♠3 NT1
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +1430 6-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  680          2.00   0.00  4 N +2   B5-Steward-Escobedo vs B1-Acutt-Mendel
  230          1.00   1.00  2♠ N +4   B6-Fitzgerald-Lang vs B2-Reitz-Hall
  110          0.00   2.00  2 N      B3-Torres-Thompson vs B4-Cooke-Mattox
8 ♠74
AK62
95
♣AJ875
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠A6
743
AK72
♣K963
♠KQT952
T85
QJ63
♣-
♠J83
QJ9
T84
♣QT42
12
148
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣  ♦2/1 ♥6 ♠3 NT3
EW: 4 4♠  ♣4 ♥5 NT4
LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: -300 5♣*-NS-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        110    2.00   0.00  2♠ E      B3-Torres-Thompson vs B4-Cooke-Mattox
        170    1.00   1.00  3♠ E +1   B6-Fitzgerald-Lang vs B2-Reitz-Hall
        420    0.00   2.00  4♠ E      B5-Steward-Escobedo vs B1-Acutt-Mendel
9 ♠K43
A53
854
♣QT43
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠AQ9
KQ72
QJ72
♣87
♠JT876
9
AK96
♣K65
♠52
JT864
T3
♣AJ92
9
1411
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 2  ♦4 ♠4 NT6
EW: 3 3♠  ♣5 ♥5 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  100          2.00   0.00  4♠ E -1   B6-Fitzgerald-Lang vs B2-Reitz-Hall
        140    1.00   1.00  2♠ E +1   B3-Torres-Thompson vs B4-Cooke-Mattox
        620    0.00   2.00  4♠ E      B5-Steward-Escobedo vs B1-Acutt-Mendel
10 ♠K52
AKQT
653
♣KT9
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠Q643
962
Q842
♣AQ
♠AT8
J43
AK
♣J7532
♠J97
875
JT97
♣864
15
1013
2
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6
EW: 2♣ 1 1 1♠ 1NT
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -90 1NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  200          2.00   0.00  3♠ W -2   B6-Fitzgerald-Lang vs B2-Reitz-Hall
  100          1.00   1.00  2♠ W -1   B3-Torres-Thompson vs B4-Cooke-Mattox
        120    0.00   2.00  2N E      B5-Steward-Escobedo vs B1-Acutt-Mendel
11 ♠QT
AKT75
AK2
♣A96
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠AK2
QJ9843
J65
♣8
♠J853
6
T4
♣T75432
♠9764
2
Q9873
♣KQJ
20
111
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 5 2 3♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦2 ♥4 ♠4 NT2
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: +430 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  460          2.00   0.00  3N N +2   B4-Cooke-Mattox vs B5-Steward-Escobedo
  430          1.00   1.00  3N N +1   B6-Fitzgerald-Lang vs B3-Torres-Thompson
  210          0.00   2.00  2N N +3   B1-Acutt-Mendel vs B2-Reitz-Hall
12 ♠T3
QT
AQ652
♣AJ92
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠A65
J6
KJ84
♣7654
♠KQ94
K9854
973
♣K
♠J872
A732
T
♣QT83
13
911
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 2 1 1♠ 2NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦4/5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +120 2NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  130          2.00   0.00  2♣ N +2   B6-Fitzgerald-Lang vs B3-Torres-Thompson
        200    1.00   1.00  2 N -2   B1-Acutt-Mendel vs B2-Reitz-Hall
        300    0.00   2.00  2 N -3   B4-Cooke-Mattox vs B5-Steward-Escobedo
13 ♠843
AKQ6
Q85
♣KJ3
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠QT92
T2
JT64
♣T96
♠K
873
AK92
♣A7542
♠AJ765
J954
73
♣Q8
15
314
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1/-♣ 2 1♠ 1NT  ♣7/6 ♦5
EW: 2  ♣6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +110 2-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        100    1.50   0.50  3N N -1   B1-Acutt-Mendel vs B2-Reitz-Hall
        100    1.50   0.50  4 S -1   B6-Fitzgerald-Lang vs B3-Torres-Thompson
        200    0.00   2.00  3♠ S -2   B4-Cooke-Mattox vs B5-Steward-Escobedo
14 ♠6
AJT94
QJ84
♣842
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠A8
863
AKT
♣KQJT5
♠KQ543
K5
6532
♣A7
♠JT972
Q72
97
♣963
8
1712
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣1 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT2
EW: 5♣ 4 1 4♠ 5NT
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: -460 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
   50          2.00   0.00  2 W -1   B1-Acutt-Mendel vs B2-Reitz-Hall
        420    1.00   1.00  4♠ E      B6-Fitzgerald-Lang vs B3-Torres-Thompson
        460    0.00   2.00  3N W +2   B4-Cooke-Mattox vs B5-Steward-Escobedo
15 ♠T8
AKQ
6
♣KT85432
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠A65
T92
9754
♣AQ7
♠KJ932
4
QJT32
♣J6
♠Q74
J87653
AK8
♣9
12
108
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 4  ♦3 ♠4 NT6
EW: 3 2♠  ♣3 ♥3 NT5
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: +300 4♠*-EW/5*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  620          2.00   0.00  4 S      B6-Fitzgerald-Lang vs B3-Torres-Thompson
        100    0.50   1.50  4 S -1   B1-Acutt-Mendel vs B2-Reitz-Hall
        100    0.50   1.50  4 S -1   B4-Cooke-Mattox vs B5-Steward-Escobedo
16 ♠Q85
KQJ3
T65
♣KQ3
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠KT9642
A2
K97
♣A2
♠J
T64
QJ843
♣T964
♠A73
9875
A2
♣J875
13
144
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2  ♦3 ♠5 NT6
EW: 3 2♠  ♣5 ♥4 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -100 3*-NS/3♣*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  170          1.50   0.50  3 S +1   B5-Steward-Escobedo vs B2-Reitz-Hall
  170          1.50   0.50  3 S +1   B6-Fitzgerald-Lang vs B4-Cooke-Mattox
  140          0.00   2.00  2 S +1   B1-Acutt-Mendel vs B3-Torres-Thompson
17 ♠62
9763
AKQJ93
♣3
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠AJ
AKQT
54
♣K7642
♠Q5
J842
87
♣JT985
♠KT98743
5
T62
♣AQ
10
174
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 4♠ 1NT  ♣3/4 ♥4
EW: 3♣ 3  ♦3 ♠3 NT6
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: +300 5*-EW/5♣*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  590          2.00   0.00  4♠* S     B6-Fitzgerald-Lang vs B4-Cooke-Mattox
  420          1.00   1.00  4♠ S      B5-Steward-Escobedo vs B2-Reitz-Hall
  170          0.00   2.00  2 N +4   B1-Acutt-Mendel vs B3-Torres-Thompson
18 ♠AQ7
T962
AQ942
♣8
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠K43
873
KJ8
♣9732
♠T9865
Q4
T75
♣QT6
♠J2
AKJ5
63
♣AKJ54
12
74
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 6♣ 6 7 4♠ 6NT
EW:  ♣1 ♦1 ♥0 ♠3 NT1
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +2210 7-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  690          2.00   0.00  3N N +3   B1-Acutt-Mendel vs B3-Torres-Thompson
  650          1.00   1.00  4 N +1   B6-Fitzgerald-Lang vs B4-Cooke-Mattox
  230          0.00   2.00  2 S +4   B5-Steward-Escobedo vs B2-Reitz-Hall
19 ♠JT63
AQT9863
-
♣Q9
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠A842
7
T96
♣AT843
♠97
KJ2
AK8542
♣76
♠KQ5
54
QJ73
♣KJ52
9
811
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 1♠ 1NT  ♣6 ♦5
EW: 1♣ 2  ♥4 ♠6 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  500          2.00   0.00  4* E -2  B5-Steward-Escobedo vs B2-Reitz-Hall
  140          1.00   1.00  3 N      B6-Fitzgerald-Lang vs B4-Cooke-Mattox
         50    0.00   2.00  4 N -1   B1-Acutt-Mendel vs B3-Torres-Thompson
20 ♠A96
Q963
A72
♣QJ4
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠Q8
KJT42
98
♣9532
♠JT74
A75
QT64
♣AT
♠K532
8
KJ53
♣K876
13
611
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2 3♠ 1NT  ♥6
EW: 1  ♣5 ♦5 ♠4 NT5
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  140          2.00   0.00  3♠ S      B6-Fitzgerald-Lang vs B4-Cooke-Mattox
   90          1.00   1.00  1N N      B1-Acutt-Mendel vs B3-Torres-Thompson
        100    0.00   2.00  2♠ S -1   B5-Steward-Escobedo vs B2-Reitz-Hall
21 ♠98653
AK96
64
♣K9
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠AQ
J54
AKQT98
♣A6
♠J72
QT73
73
♣QJ84
♠KT4
82
J52
♣T7532
10
206
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦2 ♥3 ♠6 NT2
EW: 2♣ 3 4 1♠ 4NT
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -430 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  150          2.00   0.00  5 E -3   B2-Reitz-Hall vs B3-Torres-Thompson
        150    1.00   1.00  3 W +2   B6-Fitzgerald-Lang vs B5-Steward-Escobedo
        400    0.00   2.00  5 W      B4-Cooke-Mattox vs B1-Acutt-Mendel
22 ♠K9
3
JT854
♣KQT76
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠A54
A84
AQ763
♣52
♠QT876
JT72
K9
♣AJ
♠J32
KQ965
2
♣9843
9
1411
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣  ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT4
EW: 2 2 3♠ 2NT  ♣5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  400          2.00   0.00  4♠ E -4   B6-Fitzgerald-Lang vs B5-Steward-Escobedo
  100          1.00   1.00  4♠ E -1   B2-Reitz-Hall vs B3-Torres-Thompson
        200    0.00   2.00  2 S -4   B4-Cooke-Mattox vs B1-Acutt-Mendel
23 ♠A9
632
QT542
♣Q62
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠862
AK54
AK76
♣A4
♠Q43
JT87
8
♣KT987
♠KJT75
Q9
J93
♣J53
8
186
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦6 ♥2 ♠5 NT5
EW: 3♣ 1 4 2NT  ♠6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -620 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        120    2.00   0.00  2N W      B6-Fitzgerald-Lang vs B5-Steward-Escobedo
        140    1.00   1.00  3 E      B4-Cooke-Mattox vs B1-Acutt-Mendel
        170    0.00   2.00  3 E +1   B2-Reitz-Hall vs B3-Torres-Thompson