- Wednesday Aft - August 7, 2019

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Field strength:  Mean: 14 MP  Geomean: 11 MP
(based on 9 players, 5 non ACBL players ignored)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Carol Marquez-Olson - Linda Forsyth 70.83 1st OE 0.92
Bob Deal - Merrily Lewis 55.56 2nd OE 0.69
Marc Welter - Suzanne Brenner 54.17 1st OF 0.78
Jessica Harris - Yvonne Graczyk 45.83 2nd OF 0.59
EVENT>NAP 49er Pairs           |SESSION>Wednesday Aft|SECTION> B
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>August 7, 2019     |CLUB NO.>131102    | 08/07/2019 15:37
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Chris Gillmon   |RATING>Club - North American Pairs  |MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   18.0 |TOP>   2 |MP LIMITS>50/20/10       |CLUB>Ventura Unit Bridge Club
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT E=7/F=5/G=5                       ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |      Overall    |           Section       |      |Final    |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-E|Rnk-F|Rnk-G|Rnk-E|Rnk-F|Rnk-G| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Carol Marquez-Olson    Linda Forsyth            E   1     .     .   |   1     .     .     25.50  70.83  0.92(OE)
 2 Marianne Prudhome      Ruff Smith               G   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     13.00  36.11
 3 Robert Carrier         Joy Kobayashi            G   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     15.50  43.06
 5 Virginia Celeste       Jo Ann Wedding           G   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     16.00  44.44
 6 Bob Deal               Merrily Lewis            E   2     .     .   |   2     .     .     20.00  55.56  0.69(OE)
 7 Yvonne Graczyk         Jessica Harris           G   .     2     2   |   .     2     2     16.50  45.83  0.59(OF)
 8 Marc Welter            Suzanne Brenner          G   3     1     1   |   3     1     1     19.50  54.17  0.78(OF)
                                          Totals                                            126.00

Hands and Results
1 ♠QJ82
3
AK42
♣JT93
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠97
AK64
T653
♣K82
♠KT653
JT
7
♣AQ754
♠A4
Q98752
QJ98
♣6
11
1010
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 3  ♣4 ♠5 NT6
EW: 2/3♣ 2♠ 1NT  ♦3 ♥4
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: +100 3♠*-EW/4♣*-W-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  110          2.00   0.00  2 N +1   B8-Welter-Brenner vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
         50    1.00   1.00  3 N -1   B3-Carrier-Kobayashi vs B7-Graczyk-Harris
        110    0.00   2.00  2♠ E      B5-Celeste-Wedding vs B6-Deal-Lewis
2 ♠KJT7
62
A976
♣J64
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠A9542
KT
KQ
♣9532
♠Q3
J87
JT52
♣AK87
♠86
AQ9543
843
♣QT
9
1211
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣4 ♦5 ♠4 NT6
EW: 3♣ 1 2♠ 1NT  ♥5
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -110 2♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
   50          2.00   0.00  1N E -1   B3-Carrier-Kobayashi vs B7-Graczyk-Harris
        110    1.00   1.00  3♣ E      B5-Celeste-Wedding vs B6-Deal-Lewis
        300    0.00   2.00  2 S -3   B8-Welter-Brenner vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
3 ♠JT3
KQ3
AKQ7
♣Q98
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠AK86
9852
J85
♣T2
♠Q942
AJ
T43
♣AK64
♠75
T764
962
♣J753
17
814
1
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT6
EW: 1 3♠ 1NT  ♣6 ♦6
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        100    2.00   0.00  1N N -2   B5-Celeste-Wedding vs B6-Deal-Lewis
        110    1.00   1.00  2♠ W      B3-Carrier-Kobayashi vs B7-Graczyk-Harris
        140    0.00   2.00  2♠ W +1   B8-Welter-Brenner vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
4 ♠K96
J87
AJ
♣Q9654
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠A8542
96
T7543
♣A
♠T
K543
KQ92
♣KJ82
♠QJ73
AQT2
86
♣T73
11
812
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1♠  ♦3 ♥6 NT6
EW: 3  ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -110 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        110    2.00   0.00  2 E +1   B3-Carrier-Kobayashi vs B5-Celeste-Wedding
        130    0.50   1.50  3 E +1   B6-Deal-Lewis vs B7-Graczyk-Harris
        130    0.50   1.50  3 E +1   B8-Welter-Brenner vs B2-Prudhome-Smith
5 ♠JT6
98
AK952
♣QJ2
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠973
43
QJT6
♣KT73
♠AKQ2
KJ75
87
♣A95
♠854
AQT62
43
♣864
11
617
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣5 ♦6 ♠5 NT5
EW: 2♣ 1 1♠ 1NT  ♥6
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: -90 1NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
   50          2.00   0.00  3N E -1   B8-Welter-Brenner vs B2-Prudhome-Smith
        110    1.00   1.00  2♠ E      B6-Deal-Lewis vs B7-Graczyk-Harris
        120    0.00   2.00  1N E +1   B3-Carrier-Kobayashi vs B5-Celeste-Wedding
6 ♠Q985
2
Q9432
♣842
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠J642
KJT97
5
♣953
♠T73
A6
JT876
♣JT7
♠AK
Q8543
AK
♣AKQ6
4
56
25
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 4 2 3♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦2 ♥5 ♠3 NT4
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: +400 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  460          2.00   0.00  5N S      B6-Deal-Lewis vs B7-Graczyk-Harris
  130          1.00   1.00  2♣ S +2   B8-Welter-Brenner vs B2-Prudhome-Smith
  110          0.00   2.00  2 S      B3-Carrier-Kobayashi vs B5-Celeste-Wedding

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  Pass2
Pass21Pass22
Pass23Pass2NT4
Pass3Pass3
Pass3NTAll pass 
  1. Game forcing (A, K or 2 Qs)
  2. Relay to 2 (Kokish)
  3. Forced
  4. 24+ HCP

South has a very powerful hand, but will need to trust North to not get too high on this hand. After South opens 2, responses and follow-ups will vary depending on partnership agreement. One popular expert approach is shown here. North responds 2 with any game forcing hand (an Ace, a King, or two Queens or better.) Now, South bids 2NT immediately with a "minimum" 2 opener of 22-23 HCP, and bids 2 with either a stronger balanced hand, or a hand with a suit. This is known as the "Kokish" relay and has become a very popular way to show strong balanced hands of various strength without going past 2NT. North is forced to bid 2 over 2, and now South bids 2NT confirming a balanced hand of 24+ HCP. Note that South's suit is neither good enough nor long enough to want to bid naturally, and it is clear to show the hand as balanced, given that both of the doubletons are a pretty strong stopper!!! After North looks for a fit, and signs off in 3NT, South should be content, as their hand is not any stronger than already shown, and it should be clear that the and holdings might create some communication difficulties.

Against a 3NT contract in general, West would certainly lead a , but they might be more inclined to lead a safer suit at matchpoints given the massive strength shown in the South hand. As it happens, a lead is actually best for the defense, as East can win with the Ace and continue the suit. As long as declarer isn't foolish enough to play the Queen, things will work out well, despite the tenuous situation. West can win the Jack and safely exit in another suit. Declarer doesn't have any way to get to the dummy on their own, but will be able to use the opponents to help with that. After cashing the AK, AK and four tricks (thanks to the nice break in the suit), declarer can exit a , and West will either be forced to give up the ninth trick to declarer in the suit or lead a to dummy's Queen. Declarer won't even have to guess which suit West has left at trick 13, as West will have conveniently shown out of s. The only way I can see for declarer to go wrong is if they play for West to be 4-4 in s and s and try to set up a long trick, but even that can be avoided if declarer notices that East has lead back the lowest outstanding , suggesting they started with a doubleton and not three. +400 should be a relatively common score, though some will go wrong in either the bidding or the play.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

7 ♠AK
5432
A4
♣KQJ53
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠63
A6
KQ9873
♣762
♠J975
QJ
652
♣AT98
♠QT842
KT987
JT
♣4
17
98
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 3 2♠  ♦5 NT5
EW: 2 2NT  ♣5 ♥3 ♠4
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  110          2.00   0.00  2♠ S      B5-Celeste-Wedding vs B2-Prudhome-Smith
        100    1.00   1.00  4 N -1   B8-Welter-Brenner vs B3-Carrier-Kobayashi
        400    0.00   2.00  3N N -4   B7-Graczyk-Harris vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   Pass
233Dbl
Pass4All pass 

It's hard to see how N/S can stop on a dime in 3 on this hand. West will open 2 at many tables. It would be nice to have a little better suit quality or some shortness, but at matchpoints, it is usually best to be aggressive at preempting. North has a good hand, but can't really double with only a doubleton , and a rather poor four card suit. So, it looks like overcalling 3 is the only reasonable choice, even though North should usually have a six card suit for this. East can just squeak out a raise, despite the overall poor nature of the hand, but might also pass. Either way, South will have to decide whether their 5-5 holding in the majors but relatively weak hand is worth bidding when their shortness is facing their partner's long suit. If South does bid, North will surely drive to game, as 4 might make opposite a very mild hand by South. Notice that 4 would be a much better contract if South's Q or even the J were in s instead. As it happens, 4 is doomed unless the opponents decide not to lead s. As a lead will be marked from both sides, it's hard to see how the defense won't make four tricks. A contract has five unavoidable losers, so N/S can't even take comfort in the possibility that a contract will +110 for E/W. Any N/S pair who manages to play 3 should do very well indeed.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

8 ♠K65
Q954
AKT652
♣-
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠J32
J2
J4
♣KT9852
♠AQT4
K876
Q97
♣73
♠987
AT3
83
♣AQJ64
12
611
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4/2 2/1 1/-♠ 1NT
       ♣6 ♠7/6
EW: 1♣  ♦3 ♥4/5 ♠6 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +130 4-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  150          2.00   0.00  3♠ E -3   B8-Welter-Brenner vs B3-Carrier-Kobayashi
  130          1.00   1.00  2 N +2   B7-Graczyk-Harris vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
   90          0.00   2.00  2 N      B5-Celeste-Wedding vs B2-Prudhome-Smith

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
Pass1Pass1NT
Pass2Pass2NT
Pass3All pass 

Can N/S avoid the 3NT trap on this hand? Only a few bidding sequences will be successful. North has a normal 1 opening bid, and unless E/W are playing minimum offshape Takeout Double , allowing East to double, N/S will have the bidding to themselves. If East does double, it's a lot less clear what the final contract will be. Assuming East passes, some South pairs will be able to bid 2NT to show 11-12 HCP balanced, some will be able to bid 2 without forcing game and others will be forced to bid 1NT. With the current trend towards light opening bids, I'm not fond of jumping to 2NT with 11-12 HCP and prefer to just bid 1NT with most hands in this range, but this isn't necessarily a popular approach. If you do bid 2NT with 11-12 HCP, do you know whether a rebid of North's minor is forcing or to play? Anytime your partner bids any number of NT over your 1 opening bid, they are always marked with some length in s, so North knows that a NT contract might have issues. Either South has good enough support for the suit to run, and 3NT will probably make, or South has length in s and not a good fit, in which case a NT contract will likely be poor. At IMPs, North should probably just take a chance and try 3NT, but at matchpoints it's a lot less clear. The situation isn't any better for North if South bids only 1NT as North will rebid 2 and now South will rightly feel that they need to bid again and will try 2NT, leaving North with the same choice. All in all, I expect many pairs to be playing 3NT with a few in 2NT or 3.

How will 3NT fare? It turns out that it might well be a better contract than it first appears. If West leads a , declarer can win and lead a . Most defenders will not be familiar with the importance of playing second hand high here, and will quietly play low, allowing declarer to put in the 10. East will be forced to win and continue s, but now declarer can win, run the suit, and eventually lead a to the Ace and a to the 9 to make their contract. Or East might get endplayed in s. West is certainly unlikely to find a as their opening lead, which would certainly doom 3NT, and make even 2NT likely to fail. There will certainly be some +400 scores for N/S and they are likely to be near tops.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

9 ♠9732
AJ83
Q54
♣Q8
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠AKJ
72
J83
♣AJT72
♠Q64
KT5
A962
♣K93
♠T85
Q964
KT7
♣654
9
1412
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT3
EW: 4♣ 4 1 3♠ 4NT
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -630 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        130    2.00   0.00  2♣ W +2   B5-Celeste-Wedding vs B2-Prudhome-Smith
        600    0.50   1.50  3N E      B8-Welter-Brenner vs B3-Carrier-Kobayashi
        600    0.50   1.50  5♣ E      B7-Graczyk-Harris vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 Pass1Pass
2Pass2NTPass
3NTAll pass  

E/W should have no problems getting to 3NT on this hand, though either partner might end up as declarer. The defense is likely to get off to a lead, and all the matchpoints will come down to which way declarer decides to finesse the Queen. As declarer can pick up all of the 4-1 splits in the South hand, but will lose to the singleton Queen in the Sou'th hand if they play North for the length, it is correct to finesse South for the Queen, absent any other information from the bidding or opening lead. As the opening lead will likely make it obvious that the length is split, I expect most declarers to play s the normal way and lose a trick to North's Queen. Thus, +600 should be a relatively common E/W score. Any pair who play s in the other direction, or gain an overtrick in s should be well above average.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

10 ♠K4
AJ52
KT73
♣T93
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠QT6
Q93
AQ52
♣K65
♠9873
T764
96
♣AJ7
♠AJ52
K8
J84
♣Q842
11
135
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 3 3 2♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT3
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +600 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  300          1.50   0.50  1 W -3   B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B2-Prudhome-Smith
  300          1.50   0.50  1 W -3   B6-Deal-Lewis vs B3-Carrier-Kobayashi
  150          0.00   2.00  1N N +2   B5-Celeste-Wedding vs B7-Graczyk-Harris
11 ♠J74
Q74
K87
♣9654
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠T63
A9632
QJ53
♣A
♠92
KJT
T64
♣QJ872
♠AKQ85
85
A92
♣KT3
6
117
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♠ 1NT  ♣6 ♦5 ♥4
EW: 1 3  ♣6 ♠5 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -140 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
   80          2.00   0.00  1♠ S      B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B2-Prudhome-Smith
         50    1.00   1.00  1N S -1   B6-Deal-Lewis vs B3-Carrier-Kobayashi
        100    0.00   2.00  3♠ S -2   B5-Celeste-Wedding vs B7-Graczyk-Harris
12 ♠QT842
A965
QJ9
♣A
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠7653
K743
AKT84
♣-
♠J9
QJ2
632
♣KQT74
♠AK
T8
75
♣J986532
13
109
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1 1/2♠ 1NT  ♦4
EW: 1  ♣5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5
LoTT: 14 - 16 = -2
Par: +110 2♠-N
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  250          2.00   0.00  4 W -5   B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B2-Prudhome-Smith
   80          1.00   1.00  1♠ N      B6-Deal-Lewis vs B3-Carrier-Kobayashi
        200    0.00   2.00  3♠ N -2   B5-Celeste-Wedding vs B7-Graczyk-Harris
13 ♠AQJ632
AJ84
-
♣Q96
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠85
Q732
J5
♣A8753
♠K7
95
AKT973
♣KT4
♠T94
KT6
Q8642
♣J2
14
713
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 4♠  ♣5 ♦5 NT6
EW: 2♣ 2  ♥5 ♠3 NT5
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +620 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  620          1.50   0.50  4♠ N      B2-Prudhome-Smith vs B3-Carrier-Kobayashi
  620          1.50   0.50  4♠ N      B6-Deal-Lewis vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
  140          0.00   2.00  3♠ N      B8-Welter-Brenner vs B5-Celeste-Wedding
14 ♠AJT9
T54
74
♣KQT7
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠87632
AJ2
Q
♣J862
♠K54
Q763
AKJT9
♣9
♠Q
K98
86532
♣A543
10
813
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣  ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT5
EW: 2 2 1♠ 2NT  ♣4
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -100 3♣*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  150          2.00   0.00  2 E -3   B8-Welter-Brenner vs B5-Celeste-Wedding
  100          1.00   1.00  4♠ W -2   B2-Prudhome-Smith vs B3-Carrier-Kobayashi
        110    0.00   2.00  2♠ W      B6-Deal-Lewis vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
15 ♠85
JT65
Q5
♣AQJ94
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠92
KQ8
T9743
♣T83
♠KQ763
3
J86
♣7652
♠AJT4
A9742
AK2
♣K
10
56
19
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 2/3 5 4♠ 5NT
EW:  ♣2/1 ♦4 ♥2 ♠2 NT2/1
LoTT: 15 - 17 = -2
Par: +660 5NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  650          1.50   0.50  4 S +1   B8-Welter-Brenner vs B5-Celeste-Wedding
  650          1.50   0.50  4 N +1   B2-Prudhome-Smith vs B3-Carrier-Kobayashi
        100    0.00   2.00  6 S -1   B6-Deal-Lewis vs B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
16 ♠AQT974
743
7
♣AJ9
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠K
QT98652
K84
♣74
♠J865
J
JT953
♣KT3
♠32
AK
AQ62
♣Q8652
11
86
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 2 1 5♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣1 ♦5 ♥6 ♠2 NT3
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +450 5♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  400          2.00   0.00  3N S      B7-Graczyk-Harris vs B2-Prudhome-Smith
  200          1.00   1.00  2♠ N +3   B8-Welter-Brenner vs B6-Deal-Lewis
  170          0.00   2.00  2♠ N +2   B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B5-Celeste-Wedding
17 ♠AJT63
T97
J65
♣QJ
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠72
J3
Q973
♣KT932
♠KQ8
AK82
T2
♣A875
♠954
Q654
AK84
♣64
9
616
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4
EW: 4♣ 2 2 1♠ 3NT
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -400 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        150    1.50   0.50  1N E +2   B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B5-Celeste-Wedding
        150    1.50   0.50  1N E +2   B8-Welter-Brenner vs B6-Deal-Lewis
        400    0.00   2.00  3N E      B7-Graczyk-Harris vs B2-Prudhome-Smith
18 ♠A94
AJ964
63
♣AK9
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠86
KT73
AKT98
♣82
♠KQ72
Q85
7
♣QJ764
♠JT53
2
QJ542
♣T53
16
1010
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 1♠  ♣6 ♥5 NT5
EW: 1 1/2NT  ♣6 ♦6 ♠6
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -120 2NT-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
   80          2.00   0.00  1 N      B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B5-Celeste-Wedding
   50          1.00   1.00  2N E -1   B7-Graczyk-Harris vs B2-Prudhome-Smith
        400    0.00   2.00  3N N -4   B8-Welter-Brenner vs B6-Deal-Lewis
19 ♠A
Q982
J7543
♣742
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠87654
K76
9
♣KQ85
♠QJ92
A43
Q8
♣AJ96
♠KT3
JT5
AKT62
♣T3
7
814
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 2 1NT  ♣3 ♠4
EW: 3♣ 3♠  ♦4 ♥5 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 19 = -1
Par: -100 4*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  110          1.50   0.50  3 S      B8-Welter-Brenner vs B7-Graczyk-Harris
  110          1.50   0.50  2 S +1   B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B3-Carrier-Kobayashi
        140    0.00   2.00  3♠ E      B2-Prudhome-Smith vs B6-Deal-Lewis
20 ♠KT5
3
KQ932
♣Q953
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠AQ9763
9852
6
♣A2
♠J82
AT76
JT4
♣KT4
♠4
KQJ4
A875
♣J876
10
109
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2  ♥5 ♠5 NT6
EW: 1 2♠  ♣4 ♦4 NT5
LoTT: 16 - 18 = -2
Par: -110 2♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  100          2.00   0.00  3♠ W -1   B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B3-Carrier-Kobayashi
        100    1.00   1.00  3 N -1   B8-Welter-Brenner vs B7-Graczyk-Harris
        200    0.00   2.00  4 N -2   B2-Prudhome-Smith vs B6-Deal-Lewis
21 ♠Q6
KT4
QJ842
♣AT3
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠AJT98
Q75
K93
♣64
♠K5432
A96
T5
♣875
♠7
J832
A76
♣KQJ92
12
107
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 4 2  ♠5 NT6
EW: 2♠  ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +130 4-NS/4♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  140          2.00   0.00  3 S      B8-Welter-Brenner vs B7-Graczyk-Harris
  130          1.00   1.00  2♣ S +2   B2-Prudhome-Smith vs B6-Deal-Lewis
        140    0.00   2.00  2♠ E +1   B1-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B3-Carrier-Kobayashi