---> The Common Game Home Page

- Wednesday Aft - August 28, 2019

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Field strength:  Mean: 20 MP  Geomean: 13 MP
(based on 10 players, 6 non ACBL players ignored)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Marianne Prudhome - Ruff Smith 61.90 1st OA 0.71
Jo Ann Wedding - Virginia Celeste 54.76 2/3rd OA 0.47
Chris Johnson - Dana Johnson 54.76 2/3rd OA 0.47
EVENT>49er Pairs               |SESSION>Wednesday Aft|SECTION> B
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>August 28, 2019    |CLUB NO.>131102    | 08/28/2019 15:51
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Rose Buckley    |RATING>Club Championship (60%, 50%, 30% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   31.5 |TOP>   3 |MP LIMITS>50/20/5        |CLUB>Ventura Unit Bridge Club
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=8/B=6/C=3                       ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |      Overall    |           Section       |      |Final    |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Ernestine Fickerson    Bert Fickerson           A   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     33.00  52.38
 2 Virginia Celeste       Jo Ann Wedding           B  2/3   2/3    .   |  2/3   2/3    .     34.50  54.76  0.47(OA)
 3 Linda Forsyth          Carol Marquez-Olson      A   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     26.50  42.06
 4 Marianne Prudhome      Ruff Smith               C   1     1     .   |   1     1     1     39.00  61.90  0.71(OA)
 5 Jim Cooke              Dolores Mattox           C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     32.50  51.59
 6 Robert Carrier         Joy Kobayashi            B   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     26.00  41.27
 7 Tricia Mills           Lynn Arneill-Brown       B   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     26.00  41.27
 8 Dana Johnson           Chris Johnson            C  2/3   2/3    .   |  2/3   2/3    .     34.50  54.76  0.47(OA)
                                          Totals                                            252.00

Hands and Results
1 ♠63
Q8
KJ9743
♣J76
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠52
KJT5
Q65
♣Q542
♠AKJT94
964
AT2
♣A
♠Q87
A732
8
♣KT983
7
816
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT4
EW: 1 3 3♠ 2NT  ♣6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -140 3♠-EW/3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
   50          3.00   0.00 B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
        170    1.50   1.50 B2-Celeste-Wedding vs B4-Prudhome-Smith
        170    1.50   1.50 B5-Cooke-Mattox vs B6-Carrier-Kobayashi
        200    0.00   3.00 B3-Forsyth-Marquez-Olson vs B7-Mills-Arneill-Brown

Michael Berkowitz Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 23Pass
3NTAll pass  

North's 2 has flaws, but nonvulnerable with KJ9743, 2 should be standard issue. 3 is not weak after a weak bid. It shows a strong hand with spades, and is a great description of this hand. Without this bid, you'd be stuck with either a 2 bid or doubling and bidding spades, neither of which is quite right (which is why we have this available). West will likely try a pushy 3NT.

North will probably lead a diamond, and 3NT will be touch-and-go. Although double dummy says that the contract won't make, that would require a club lead (not likely). The likely actual line is that declarer will win the lead and finesse spades. South will play a club, and declarer should win in dummy and immediately play hearts or risk squeezing her hand. She might guess hearts right or not, but eventually declarer will find two diamond tricks, five spades, a club, and either a club or heart. Some declarers might even take 10 tricks.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at michael@larryco.com

2 ♠4
AQ987632
63
♣43
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠AKT8652
T5
J4
♣Q6
♠73
K4
Q5
♣AKJT752
♠QJ9
J
AKT9872
♣98
6
1013
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 3  ♣0 ♠0/3 NT0
EW: 3♣ 3♠  ♦4 ♥4 NT5
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
  100          3.00   0.00 B3-Forsyth-Marquez-Olson vs B7-Mills-Arneill-Brown
   50          2.00   1.00 B2-Celeste-Wedding vs B4-Prudhome-Smith
        200    1.00   2.00 B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
        800    0.00   3.00 B5-Cooke-Mattox vs B6-Carrier-Kobayashi

Michael Berkowitz Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  11
14PassPass
4All pass  

I'm not sure that I've ever seen a deal quite like this with every hand having at least a seven-card suit. After East's opening, nothing is very clear. South could bid 1, 2, or 3. West will bid spades at whichever level required. North will now bid her eight-card suit, likely 4. What should East do now? If South preempted, then East might choose to double (the winner), but on this auction, does East really want to double? West has a nice seven-card suit, and probably bids a a reasonable 4.

If East and South swapped their four major-suit cards, then this would be an excellent contract (and 5 would be a good sacrifice). This is another deal where you want the opponents to make the final guess. Raising the level of the auction so quickly forces everyone to hope that they are in the right spot. Declarer will learn that this is not the case when she loses the first four tricks. That is always a risk.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at michael@larryco.com

3 ♠KJ85
2
JT8765
♣84
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠64
94
AQ932
♣KQT7
♠Q932
AKT76
K
♣J32
♠AT7
QJ853
4
♣A965
5
1113
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT5
EW: 2♣ 1 1 2NT  ♠6
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
  100          3.00   0.00 B5-Cooke-Mattox vs B6-Carrier-Kobayashi
        600    1.50   1.50 B3-Forsyth-Marquez-Olson vs B7-Mills-Arneill-Brown
        600    1.50   1.50 B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
        660    0.00   3.00 B2-Celeste-Wedding vs B4-Prudhome-Smith

Michael Berkowitz Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   1
Pass1Pass2
All pass   

I've shown a relatively peaceful auction to a non-making contract. This is a deal where bad contracts abound. South might choose to rebid 2 instead of 2 which puts North in a real bind. I would probably pass and then try to bid 2 if we find ourselves doubled. West might also overcall 2, which is not a good choice on the two-level vulnerable without a stronger suit. If that does happen, likely South reopens with a double and West is probably -200.
The play in any contract will be difficult. Against 2, East will have a difficult lead choice, but I would probably try a trump. With length in the suit the opponents opened, it often pays to cut down on the ability for the opponents to crossruff. On this deal, if the defense plays trump at each opportunity, declarer will run out of tricks fairly quickly (and the defenders can set up clubs).



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at michael@larryco.com

4 ♠QJ853
T95
K95
♣J5
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠T4
8742
A86
♣A942
♠K92
AQ6
J7
♣QT876
♠A76
KJ3
QT432
♣K3
7
812
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 3♠  ♣5 ♥6 NT6
EW: 2/1♣  ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
  170          3.00   0.00 B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B2-Celeste-Wedding
  110          2.00   1.00 B3-Forsyth-Marquez-Olson vs B5-Cooke-Mattox
        110    1.00   2.00 B4-Prudhome-Smith vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
        120    0.00   3.00 B6-Carrier-Kobayashi vs B7-Mills-Arneill-Brown

Michael Berkowitz Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
PassPass1Dbl
11Dbl1Pass
22All pass 
  1. support double

These sorts of partscore decisions will constantly creep up. Let's go through the many decisions facing our heroes on this deal. West and North both pass and then East's 1 is simple, but then what should South do? I think with such weak diamonds I would try doubling, but 1 is reasonable. West will bid 1 either way and North should probably bid 1 either way as well and East should make a Support Double(s) if available. If it's not available, then it's a close call between 1NT and pass or possibly 2--if South doubled I would try 1NT and if South bid diamonds I'd pass (see how the domino effect works on this deal) or try 2. Are we confused yet? On our auction, South can't raise, but if she bid diamonds originally, she would bid 2. West preferences to clubs and North can compete to the 2-level. Should East or West compete to 3? At a different vulnerability, maybe. On this deal, it likely will work, but I would be afraid and probably let the opponents play 2.

In 2, East will probably lead a fourth-best 7. Dummy should play low (if they led from the ace, they deserve to win the extra trick), and West should take stock. A good habit before you play third to the trick is to analyze the opening lead. Normally, we'd be hesitant to play the ace here, since it could give away a trick if declarer has Qxx. Is that the case here? Nope! You should be able to figure out that declarer has 2 or 3 clubs headed by the J. The Rule of 11 (take the spot led and subtract that number from 11 to see how many higher cards are out) shows that there are 4 cards missing higher than the 7. That means declarer has either the Q, J, or 10. Why do we know that declarer has the J? If you had QJ or J10, which card you lead? Not fourth-best! This type of "magic trick" should really be part of your regular thinking before playing to trick two. That means you can safely win the A and return a club. Declarer has to lose one trick in each suit, but will have to guess diamonds to avoid going down.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at michael@larryco.com

5 ♠QJ2
654
AQJ976
♣8
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠63
J983
K
♣AQ9764
♠AT94
Q72
T542
♣J3
♠K875
AKT
83
♣KT52
10
107
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 -/1 2/3♠ 2NT
       ♣5/6 ♥6/7
EW: 1♣  ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +140 3♠-N
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
  620          3.00   0.00 B4-Prudhome-Smith vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
  100          2.00   1.00 B3-Forsyth-Marquez-Olson vs B5-Cooke-Mattox
        100    0.50   2.50 B6-Carrier-Kobayashi vs B7-Mills-Arneill-Brown
        100    0.50   2.50 B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B2-Celeste-Wedding

Michael Berkowitz Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 1Pass1
2Dbl1Pass3NT
All pass   
  1. Support Double(s)

I sometimes have to remind myself to avoid the word normal, especially when I show an auction where a hand with a 10-count opens the bidding. That said, I think 3NT looks like a normal contract. The North hand is too strong for a preempt, even at these colors. South could choose to game-force by bidding 2 or bid a simple 1 as shown here (this is a matter of style when 4-4, but you should never bypass a 5-card major unless you have extreme shape). West will bid 2 over 1 and North makes a Support Double. South could think about passing to defend 2x, but the colors make it much more likely that 3NT will be a good score. You should be hesitant to make a penalty pass when your trump are in front of the declarer.

Against 3NT, West will lead the 7 and East will play the J. Declarer should win and then play a diamond. The K's appearance at trick two seems like a mixed blessing. It's possible that this is from Kx, but unlikely. As a result, South might consider ducking, to lose the diamond trick to West rather than East. If declarer wins the diamond and continues diamonds, she'll find out the bad news and should hope that West has the A. She can play one round of spades before playing her third diamond. When East has the A, declarer will go down two (five clubs and a spade). Some declarers might go down three (depending on whether East is willing to cash the diamond winner). That said, I've seen leads like the A allow declarer to make it. When you have a long suit and no entries, it's important to lead low. The double dummy way to make 8 tricks is to hold up in clubs, but there's no reason to consider that line.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at michael@larryco.com

6 ♠J954
AK97
T4
♣J82
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠QT8
T865
J75
♣T65
♠A7
J432
AK863
♣K9
♠K632
Q
Q92
♣AQ743
9
315
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 1 3♠ 2NT  ♦6
EW: 1/-
       ♣4/3 ♦7/6 ♥6 ♠4 NT5/4
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
         50    2.50   0.50 B3-Forsyth-Marquez-Olson vs B5-Cooke-Mattox
         50    2.50   0.50 B4-Prudhome-Smith vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
         70    1.00   2.00 B6-Carrier-Kobayashi vs B7-Mills-Arneill-Brown
         90    0.00   3.00 B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B2-Celeste-Wedding
7 ♠J5
6
JT6
♣KQJ9653
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠97
AKQ732
984
♣72
♠AKQ6432
4
3
♣AT84
♠T8
JT985
AKQ752
♣-
8
913
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 3  ♥5 ♠2 NT2
EW: 1 4/3♠ 1NT  ♣5 ♦3/2
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: -500 5*-NS-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
  200          3.00   0.00 B5-Cooke-Mattox vs B2-Celeste-Wedding
  100          2.00   1.00 B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B3-Forsyth-Marquez-Olson
        200    1.00   2.00 B7-Mills-Arneill-Brown vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
        650    0.00   3.00 B4-Prudhome-Smith vs B6-Carrier-Kobayashi
8 ♠964
AJ7
T32
♣J832
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠KJ7
KQT62
964
♣K4
♠Q
9853
QJ85
♣AQ97
♠AT8532
4
AK7
♣T65
6
1211
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♠  ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 NT5
EW: 1♣ 2 2  ♠6 NT6
LoTT: 15 - 18 = -3
Par: -100 2♠*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
  100          2.00   1.00 B4-Prudhome-Smith vs B6-Carrier-Kobayashi
  100          2.00   1.00 B5-Cooke-Mattox vs B2-Celeste-Wedding
  100          2.00   1.00 B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B3-Forsyth-Marquez-Olson
   50          0.00   3.00 B7-Mills-Arneill-Brown vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
9 ♠872
873
87
♣AQT96
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠KQ4
T2
AKQ943
♣52
♠AJ653
AK96
T
♣J74
♠T9
QJ54
J652
♣K83
6
1413
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦0 ♥4 ♠0 NT0
EW: 1♣ 5 3 5♠ 2NT
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -650 5♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
        620    3.00   0.00 B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B3-Forsyth-Marquez-Olson
        650    2.00   1.00 B5-Cooke-Mattox vs B2-Celeste-Wedding
        710    0.50   2.50 B4-Prudhome-Smith vs B6-Carrier-Kobayashi
        710    0.50   2.50 B7-Mills-Arneill-Brown vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
10 ♠K6
QJ95
QJ8
♣K732
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠AJ
7632
9
♣JT9864
♠T843
K8
AT732
♣Q5
♠Q9752
AT4
K654
♣A
12
69
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 4 4 4♠ 5NT
EW:  ♣6 ♦3 ♥3/2 ♠3 NT2
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: +660 5NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
  620          3.00   0.00 B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B4-Prudhome-Smith
  600          1.50   1.50 B5-Cooke-Mattox vs B7-Mills-Arneill-Brown
  600          1.50   1.50 B6-Carrier-Kobayashi vs B3-Forsyth-Marquez-Olson
        200    0.00   3.00 B1-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B2-Celeste-Wedding
11 ♠A4
T8652
A76
♣J53
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠T53
Q
KJ952
♣T962
♠KJ9862
97
QT843
♣-
♠Q7
AKJ43
-
♣AKQ874
9
66
19
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 7♣ 7/6 7NT  ♦3 ♠4
EW: 4 3♠  ♣0 ♥0 NT0
LoTT: 23 - 20 = +3
Par: +1520 7NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
  510          2.50   0.50 B1-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B2-Celeste-Wedding
  510          2.50   0.50 B5-Cooke-Mattox vs B7-Mills-Arneill-Brown
  480          1.00   2.00 B6-Carrier-Kobayashi vs B3-Forsyth-Marquez-Olson
  260          0.00   3.00 B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B4-Prudhome-Smith
12 ♠T652
96
84
♣AQ652
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠983
AQ875
2
♣T984
♠AKQ
K3
QJT953
♣J3
♠J74
JT42
AK76
♣K7
6
616
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♠  ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 NT5
EW: 2 2 2NT  ♣6 ♠6
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
   50          3.00   0.00 B5-Cooke-Mattox vs B7-Mills-Arneill-Brown
         90    1.50   1.50 B1-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B2-Celeste-Wedding
         90    1.50   1.50 B6-Carrier-Kobayashi vs B3-Forsyth-Marquez-Olson
        110    0.00   3.00 B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B4-Prudhome-Smith
13 ♠832
KT2
J3
♣KQT98
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠QT75
AQJ3
98
♣J52
♠K4
654
A654
♣A643
♠AJ96
987
KQT72
♣7
9
1011
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1  ♥6 ♠6 NT6
EW: 1 -/1NT
       ♣6 ♦5 ♠6 NT6/7
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -90 1NT-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
  300          3.00   0.00 B2-Celeste-Wedding vs B3-Forsyth-Marquez-Olson
  200          2.00   1.00 B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B5-Cooke-Mattox
  100          1.00   2.00 B7-Mills-Arneill-Brown vs B4-Prudhome-Smith
    PASS       0.00   3.00 B6-Carrier-Kobayashi vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
14 ♠-
QJT9653
AQT53
♣6
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠987532
A8
4
♣J852
♠AKQJ4
K2
K76
♣AK4
♠T6
74
J982
♣QT973
9
523
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 3/2  ♣4 ♠2 NT2
EW: 3♣ 5♠ 5NT  ♦4 ♥4
LoTT: 20 - 20 = 0
Par: -460 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
        450    2.50   0.50 B2-Celeste-Wedding vs B3-Forsyth-Marquez-Olson
        450    2.50   0.50 B6-Carrier-Kobayashi vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
        480    1.00   2.00 B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B5-Cooke-Mattox
        510    0.00   3.00 B7-Mills-Arneill-Brown vs B4-Prudhome-Smith
15 ♠J6
KT6542
K42
♣98
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠QT95
A93
T65
♣KJ5
♠A7432
-
AQ73
♣Q643
♠K8
QJ87
J98
♣AT72
7
1012
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣4 ♦4/3 ♠2 NT6
EW: 3♣ 3 4♠  ♥5 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 19 = -1
Par: -420 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
        140    3.00   0.00 B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B5-Cooke-Mattox
        200    1.50   1.50 B2-Celeste-Wedding vs B3-Forsyth-Marquez-Olson
        200    1.50   1.50 B6-Carrier-Kobayashi vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
        450    0.00   3.00 B7-Mills-Arneill-Brown vs B4-Prudhome-Smith
16 ♠KQ7
AT83
9
♣J8543
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠T9843
-
JT842
♣T96
♠52
J9652
AKQ7
♣AQ
♠AJ6
KQ74
653
♣K72
10
116
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 4 1NT  ♦4 ♠6
EW: 3 1♠  ♣4 ♥3 NT6
LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: +420 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
  300          3.00   0.00 B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B6-Carrier-Kobayashi
  200          2.00   1.00 B1-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B5-Cooke-Mattox
         90    1.00   2.00 B7-Mills-Arneill-Brown vs B2-Celeste-Wedding
        110    0.00   3.00 B3-Forsyth-Marquez-Olson vs B4-Prudhome-Smith
17 ♠AQT972
42
96
♣Q73
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠84
A75
T8753
♣T95
♠63
QJT8
KQ4
♣8642
♠KJ5
K963
AJ2
♣AKJ
8
48
20
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1 2 4♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT3
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +430 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
  480          3.00   0.00 B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B6-Carrier-Kobayashi
  430          2.00   1.00 B3-Forsyth-Marquez-Olson vs B4-Prudhome-Smith
  420          0.50   2.50 B1-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B5-Cooke-Mattox
  420          0.50   2.50 B7-Mills-Arneill-Brown vs B2-Celeste-Wedding
18 ♠J83
87632
T72
♣64
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠AQ974
AQ
54
♣KQ32
♠KT2
KT54
Q8
♣AJ75
♠65
J9
AKJ963
♣T98
1
1713
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣0 ♥4 ♠0 NT0
EW: 5♣ 3 5♠ 1NT  ♦6
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -450 5♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
   50          3.00   0.00 B1-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B5-Cooke-Mattox
        200    2.00   1.00 B7-Mills-Arneill-Brown vs B2-Celeste-Wedding
        480    0.50   2.50 B3-Forsyth-Marquez-Olson vs B4-Prudhome-Smith
        480    0.50   2.50 B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B6-Carrier-Kobayashi
19 ♠KJT4
T965
8
♣QJ32
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠AQ95
AQJ2
AQJ
♣A9
♠3
K8743
K75
♣KT75
♠8762
-
T96432
♣864
7
249
0
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣1 ♦4 ♥0 ♠4 NT1
EW: 5/4♣ 2 7 2♠ 6NT
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -2210 7-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
        650    3.00   0.00 B1-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B3-Forsyth-Marquez-Olson
        660    2.00   1.00 B2-Celeste-Wedding vs B6-Carrier-Kobayashi
        680    0.50   2.50 B4-Prudhome-Smith vs B5-Cooke-Mattox
        680    0.50   2.50 B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B7-Mills-Arneill-Brown
20 ♠Q964
K86
A762
♣J6
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠K7
JT3
JT8
♣K9875
♠JT85
Q952
K9
♣QT3
♠A32
A74
Q543
♣A42
10
88
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 1 2♠ 1NT  ♣5
EW: 2♣  ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +110 2♠-NS/3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
  130          3.00   0.00 B4-Prudhome-Smith vs B5-Cooke-Mattox
  110          2.00   1.00 B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B7-Mills-Arneill-Brown
   80          1.00   2.00 B2-Celeste-Wedding vs B6-Carrier-Kobayashi
        100    0.00   3.00 B1-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B3-Forsyth-Marquez-Olson
21 ♠Q965
AJT
A982
♣JT
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠AT3
Q
KT763
♣AK95
♠KJ8
K75
QJ5
♣8743
♠742
986432
4
♣Q62
12
1610
2
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣3 ♦3 ♠4 NT3
EW: 3♣ 4 2♠ 4NT  ♥6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -430 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W
        100    3.00   0.00 B2-Celeste-Wedding vs B6-Carrier-Kobayashi
        110    2.00   1.00 B1-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B3-Forsyth-Marquez-Olson
        150    0.50   2.50 B4-Prudhome-Smith vs B5-Cooke-Mattox
        150    0.50   2.50 B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B7-Mills-Arneill-Brown