---> The Common Game Home Page

- Wednesday Aft - September 4, 2019

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Field strength:  Mean: 23 MP  Geomean: 16 MP
(based on 8 players, 8 non ACBL players ignored)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Marianne Prudhome - Ruff Smith 65.87 1st A 0.48
Carol Marquez-Olson - Linda Forsyth 61.11 2nd A 0.34
Bert Fickerson - Ernestine Fickerson 54.76 3rd A 0.24
Dolores Mattox - Jim Cooke 53.17 2nd B 0.21
EVENT>49er Pairs               |SESSION>Wednesday Aft|SECTION> B
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>September 4, 2019  |CLUB NO.>131102    | 09/04/2019 15:49
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Rose Buckley    |RATING>Club Masterpoint (60%, 50%, 30% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   31.5 |TOP>   3 |MP LIMITS>50/20/5        |CLUB>Ventura Unit Bridge Club
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=8/B=6/C=4                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Ernestine Fickerson    Bert Fickerson           A    3     .     .     34.50  54.76  0.24(A)
 2 Miriam Edgar           Katarina Bernbaum        B    .     .     .     26.50  42.06
 3 Mary Kay Kaufman       Lynn Arneill-Brown       B    .     .     .     22.50  35.71
 4 Marianne Prudhome      Ruff Smith               C    1     1     1     41.50  65.87  0.48(A)
 5 Marc Welter            Sally Budd               C    .     .     .     27.50  43.65
 6 Carol Marquez-Olson    Linda Forsyth            A    2     .     .     38.50  61.11  0.34(A)
 7 Jim Cooke              Dolores Mattox           C    .     2     2     33.50  53.17  0.21(B)
 8 Dana Johnson           Chris Johnson            C    .     .     .     27.50  43.65
                                          Totals                         252.00

Hands and Results
1 ♠KJ97
J753
92
♣873
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠QT65
QT92
Q
♣JT52
♠A843
K864
864
♣K9
♠2
A
AKJT753
♣AQ64
5
710
18
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 5 4NT  ♥6 ♠6
EW: 1 1♠  ♣3 ♦2 NT2
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +430 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  400          2.50   0.50  3N S      B5-Welter-Budd vs B6-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
  400          2.50   0.50  5 N      B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
  170          1.00   2.00  1 S +5   B2-Edgar-Bernbaum vs B4-Prudhome-Smith
        100    0.00   3.00  4♣ S -2   B3-Kaufman-Arneill-Brown vs B7-Cooke-Mattox

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 PassPass1
Pass1Pass3
Pass3NTAll pass 

This hand will present some surprising bidding difficulties for N/S and getting to 3NT declared by North should be a good result. After two passes, South will need to decide how to open their hand. With so few major cards, it wouldn't be the worst bid on the world to just open 3NT. However, North needs very little for South to make a slam, and certainly South would be pleasantly surprised if North were to show a raise at some point. Some South pairs might also consider opening 2. On general hand strength a 2 opener is about right but most experts won't open 2 with a minor suit oriented hand unless it's even stronger than an average 2 opening bid (e.g. 10.5 playing tricks.) So, for many, South will open 1. On the actual hand, there will be some tables which pass out 1. However, with both majors, I would stretch and respond 1 with the North hand. If North does pass, I admit I would be likely to double back in with the East hand. Certainly if South is given a chance to bid again, they will make a game forcing 3 rebid. North has the right holding to bid 3NT, but might be worried about the minimal nature of the hand. 3NT would normally suggest a decent hand, and not uust major suit stoppers, but I would not want to bid 3 with the North hand. Should South bid again over 3NT? Given that North is marked with most of their values in the majors, it looks like there will be some losers and some communication problems in or NT slam. If North had bid anything but 3NT, then the odds of some useful cards in s would be higher, and South might make at least one slam try.

Assuming North declares 3NT, East will not have an easy lead and might start with a if it is the only unbid suit. If they do, then North can win the King, lead a to the Ace and when the Queen falls, lead a back to the 9 to take the finesse. This will net declarer 11 tricks for an excellent score. Another way that declarer might end up with 11 tricks is if they finesse in s right away, and East continues with the 10, covered by the Jack and East wins and continues the suit. However, this would not be an ideal play in s, and I don't think it will happen often. If South is the declarer in NT, the defense is much more likely to lead a , and now declarer will be taking a risky play to finesse in s, and might just cash their nine tricks and go home. Overall, any pair who go +460 should be well above average.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

2 ♠J6
KT982
K5
♣7543
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠QT974
Q7
76
♣AK96
♠853
6
AQT842
♣QJ2
♠AK2
AJ543
J93
♣T8
7
119
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 1NT  ♣4 ♦4 ♠3
EW: 2♣ 2 3♠  ♥4 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  140          3.00   0.00  3 S      B5-Welter-Budd vs B6-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
  100          2.00   1.00  3♠ W -2   B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
        100    0.50   2.50  4 S -1   B2-Edgar-Bernbaum vs B4-Prudhome-Smith
        100    0.50   2.50  4 S -1   B3-Kaufman-Arneill-Brown vs B7-Cooke-Mattox

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  22
Pass3All pass 

E/W seem unlikely to find their fit as East has a fairly normal looking 2 opening bid at most tables. Yes, East can see that his hand might play well in a contract, but generally you should be looking for reasons to bid rather than looking for reasons to pass, particularly at favorable vulnerability playing matchpoints. Assuming East does open 2, South will have to stretch to bid 2, especially at unfavorable vulnerability. The South hand isn't that great overall, and doesn't have a very good suit, and I can definitely see some experts choosing to pass. If they do, 2 is likely to be the final contract. If South overcalls, North has enough length to want to bid 4, but with no singletons, and a poor side four card suit, as well as a likely poorly placed King, it looks like discretion is the better part of valor, and North should just raise to 3 which South will quickly pass. Unless West leads a , which looks unlikely, N/S will have four unavoidable losers in the minors, so staying low on the hand will be important. Any E/W pair who manage to play in , perhaps if they are using light opening bids and open 1 with the East hand, should end up with a top score as nine tricks are easy, and ten tricks might even make if South gives away the situation, allowing declarer to get away with only two losers.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

3 ♠AJT42
92
3
♣AJT43
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠Q983
KT653
K4
♣62
♠76
AQJ4
A986
♣Q85
♠K5
87
QJT752
♣K97
10
813
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 2 3♠  ♥4 NT6
EW: 3  ♣3 ♦4 ♠4 NT5
LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
         50    3.00   0.00  2♠ N -1   B5-Welter-Budd vs B6-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
        100    2.00   1.00  4 S -2   B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
        110    1.00   2.00  2 W      B3-Kaufman-Arneill-Brown vs B7-Cooke-Mattox
        140    0.00   3.00  3 W      B2-Edgar-Bernbaum vs B4-Prudhome-Smith

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   2
All pass   

As with the last hand, South has a maximum 2 opening on strength, given the vulnerability, and no shortness, but 2 will still be the choice of many. No one has a good bid to make over 2 and it will often be the final contract. If South passes, it isn't clear where the hand will end. North might open 1, East double, and then South and West do some bidding, likely ending up in a contract for E/W. Or North might pass as well and show one or two suits after East opens 1, South passes and West responds 1. In almost all bidding sequences, it's hard to see how N/S can get to the best double dummy contract of 3, or even get to a contract. It turns out that s is the most difficult contract for N/S. Let's say West leads a . East can win the Ace, continue with the Queen and then lead a . Declarer is unlikely to play the 7, and after West wins with the King, it will be safe to exit a . Declarer will be stuck with a total of five red suit losers, and will need to make a good guess in one of the black suits to avoid going down in 2. On any other defense, either the guess work in the black suits will be removed, or the defense will help declarer hold their losers to two. Any E/W pair that manage to play a contract should do very well, as it is not hard to hold the losses to four top black suit tricks.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

4 ♠AT6
KQ7654
J2
♣T3
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠Q752
A93
KT85
♣Q6
♠K843
JT8
AQ
♣K754
♠J9
2
97643
♣AJ982
10
1113
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT4
EW: 1♣ 1 1 2/3♠ 2NT
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -140 3♠-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  100          3.00   0.00  4♠ W -1   B6-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B7-Cooke-Mattox
        110    1.50   1.50  2♠ E      B4-Prudhome-Smith vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
        110    1.50   1.50  1♠ W +1   B3-Kaufman-Arneill-Brown vs B5-Welter-Budd
        200    0.00   3.00  2N S -2   B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B2-Edgar-Bernbaum

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
Pass2PassPass
DblPass2All pass

For the third hand in a row, one of the players has a potential weak two with a hand with good HCP, but poor distribution for preempting. If North does open 2, which I suspect that many will, both East and West will have to decide whether to compete with imperfect distribution and being vulnerable. I can easily see 2 passing out. East has a better hand than West, but with South still being an unpassed hand, it would be dangerous for East to make an offshape, minimal strength takeout double directly over North's 2 opening bid. West is more likely to come back in with a double when 2 gets passed around to them, as they have the comfort of both knowing that South has passed, so is at least a little limited in strength, and knowing that East won't get the bidding too high in the light of the fact that West passed to start with and is thus marked with less than opening count. Indeed, if West does double 2, East will know to only bid 2 despite holding full opening count, and this will be the final contract.

As it happens, the tables at which both East and West pass 2 might be the ones that they get the highest score. 2 is not a good contract for N/S and there are six unavoidable losers, and the potential for a seventh loser if the opponents are able to set up for a ruff. I can easily see this happening if East leads a , declarer plays low, and West wins and switches to a . Off one for N/S won't be bad, as E/W will make 2, but off two will be a disaster at this vulnerability. I expect any pair doing better than +100 for E/W will be above average.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

5 ♠874
A982
J53
♣762
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠K5
J54
KQT64
♣J94
♠JT32
QT6
A
♣AQT85
♠AQ96
K73
9872
♣K3
5
1013
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT4
EW: 3♣ 3/2 1 1♠ 2NT
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
         90    2.50   0.50  2♣ W      B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B2-Edgar-Bernbaum
         90    2.50   0.50  2♣ E      B6-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B7-Cooke-Mattox
        110    0.50   2.50  2 W +1   B4-Prudhome-Smith vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
        110    0.50   2.50  2♣ E +1   B3-Kaufman-Arneill-Brown vs B5-Welter-Budd
6 ♠A8432
AQ3
AQ9
♣86
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠JT976
65
JT53
♣Q5
♠-
KT84
K8762
♣AT32
♠KQ5
J972
4
♣KJ974
16
410
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 3 3♠ 2NT  ♦5
EW: 2  ♣4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +140 3♠-NS/3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  140          3.00   0.00  2♠ N +1   B4-Prudhome-Smith vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
  110          2.00   1.00  2♠ N      B6-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B7-Cooke-Mattox
         50    1.00   2.00  3♠ N -1   B3-Kaufman-Arneill-Brown vs B5-Welter-Budd
        100    0.00   3.00  4♠ N -2   B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B2-Edgar-Bernbaum
7 ♠5
KQJ9853
J5
♣K85
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠QJ94
74
9874
♣Q73
♠KT87
A6
AKQ
♣J964
♠A632
T2
T632
♣AT2
10
517
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3  ♣5 ♦5 ♠4 NT6
EW: 1♣ 3♠  ♦6 ♥3 NT4
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  730          3.00   0.00  3* N     B7-Cooke-Mattox vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
  170          2.00   1.00  2 N +2   B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B3-Kaufman-Arneill-Brown
  140          1.00   2.00  2 N +1   B5-Welter-Budd vs B2-Edgar-Bernbaum
        140    0.00   3.00  2♠ W +1   B4-Prudhome-Smith vs B6-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
8 ♠T842
Q7
Q4
♣AT843
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠75
KT65
K632
♣Q92
♠AJ3
9843
A985
♣KJ
♠KQ96
AJ2
JT7
♣765
8
813
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1♠  ♦5 ♥5 NT6
EW: 2 2 1/-NT
       ♣6 ♠6 NT7/6
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -100 2♠*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  100          3.00   0.00  4 W -2   B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B3-Kaufman-Arneill-Brown
        110    1.00   2.00  2 W      B7-Cooke-Mattox vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
        110    1.00   2.00  1 W +1   B4-Prudhome-Smith vs B6-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
        110    1.00   2.00  2 E +1   B5-Welter-Budd vs B2-Edgar-Bernbaum
9 ♠JT943
T64
KJ6
♣76
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠K8
AKQJ987
-
♣T943
♠Q72
3
AT9874
♣A52
♠A65
52
Q532
♣KQJ8
5
1310
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT3
EW: 2♣ 2 4 1♠ 4/3NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -630 4NT-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  100          3.00   0.00  4 W -1   B7-Cooke-Mattox vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
        170    1.50   1.50  3 W +1   B4-Prudhome-Smith vs B6-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
        170    1.50   1.50  3 W +1   B5-Welter-Budd vs B2-Edgar-Bernbaum
        620    0.00   3.00  4 W      B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B3-Kaufman-Arneill-Brown
10 ♠QJ
AQJ73
T8
♣K843
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠T84
9842
52
♣JT92
♠AK9
T65
AKJ764
♣Q
♠76532
K
Q93
♣A765
13
117
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1 1♠ 1NT  ♦5
EW: 2  ♣4 ♥5 ♠6 NT6
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -90 2-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
         90    3.00   0.00  2 E      B6-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B3-Kaufman-Arneill-Brown
        100    2.00   1.00  2♣ N -1   B1-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B2-Edgar-Bernbaum
        110    1.00   2.00  2 E +1   B5-Welter-Budd vs B7-Cooke-Mattox
        130    0.00   3.00  3 E +1   B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B4-Prudhome-Smith
11 ♠AT42
K642
2
♣KQ52
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠53
AJ83
KQT84
♣76
♠Q976
QT
A963
♣T94
♠KJ8
975
J75
♣AJ83
12
108
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 2 3♠ 1NT  ♦5
EW: 2  ♣2 ♥5 ♠4 NT5
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  130          3.00   0.00  3♣ N +1   B1-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B2-Edgar-Bernbaum
   50          2.00   1.00  3 W -1   B6-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B3-Kaufman-Arneill-Brown
         50    1.00   2.00  3♠ N -1   B5-Welter-Budd vs B7-Cooke-Mattox
         90    0.00   3.00  2 W      B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B4-Prudhome-Smith
12 ♠KT986
3
Q86
♣QJ92
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠AJ7
KT2
AKT3
♣T86
♠53
AQJ76
954
♣K74
♠Q42
9854
J72
♣A53
8
1510
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♠  ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 NT4
EW: 3 3 2NT  ♣6 ♠5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -140 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
   50          2.00   1.00  4 W -1   B6-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B3-Kaufman-Arneill-Brown
   50          2.00   1.00  4 E -1   B1-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B2-Edgar-Bernbaum
   50          2.00   1.00  4 E -1   B5-Welter-Budd vs B7-Cooke-Mattox
        140    0.00   3.00  3 W      B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B4-Prudhome-Smith
13 ♠AT87
KQ2
965
♣AQ9
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠K3
T86
QJT874
♣K3
♠Q965
7543
K32
♣74
♠J42
AJ9
A
♣JT8652
15
95
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 6♣ 1 4 5♠ 5NT
EW:  ♣1 ♦6 ♥3 ♠2 NT1
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +1370 6♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  170          3.00   0.00  4♣ S +2   B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B5-Welter-Budd
  130          2.00   1.00  3♣ N +1   B2-Edgar-Bernbaum vs B3-Kaufman-Arneill-Brown
        100    1.00   2.00  3N N -1   B7-Cooke-Mattox vs B4-Prudhome-Smith
        200    0.00   3.00  4♠ N -2   B6-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
14 ♠J6
AJT732
KJ32
♣T
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠-
KQ5
AT74
♣K87642
♠AKT98432
4
-
♣Q953
♠Q75
986
Q9865
♣AJ
10
129
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2/4 2  ♣1 ♠3/2 NT5
EW: 5♣ 3♠ 1NT  ♦3 ♥3
LoTT: 21 - 19 = +2
Par: -100 5*-N-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        140    3.00   0.00  3♠ E      B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B5-Welter-Budd
        420    1.00   2.00  4♠ E      B2-Edgar-Bernbaum vs B3-Kaufman-Arneill-Brown
        420    1.00   2.00  4♠ E      B6-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
        420    1.00   2.00  4♠ E      B7-Cooke-Mattox vs B4-Prudhome-Smith
15 ♠T876
6
QJ
♣KJ9862
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠AJ53
KQ75
52
♣T54
♠K942
JT42
KT4
♣A3
♠Q
A983
A98763
♣Q7
7
1011
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2  ♥4 ♠5 NT5
EW: 2 1♠  ♣5/4 ♦5 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -110 2-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  150          3.00   0.00  3 E -3   B6-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth vs B1-Fickerson-Fickerson
  130          2.00   1.00  2 S +2   B7-Cooke-Mattox vs B4-Prudhome-Smith
        100    0.50   2.50  2 S -1   B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B5-Welter-Budd
        100    0.50   2.50  3♣ N -1   B2-Edgar-Bernbaum vs B3-Kaufman-Arneill-Brown
16 ♠T4
AT65
AT9765
♣6
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠K2
K742
J3
♣JT543
♠63
QJ83
Q82
♣AKQ8
♠AQJ9875
9
K4
♣972
8
814
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 4♠  ♣4 ♥4 NT4
EW: 1♣ 1  ♦4 ♠2 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: +420 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  300          3.00   0.00  5♣ E -3   B1-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B5-Welter-Budd
  140          1.50   1.50  3♠ S      B3-Kaufman-Arneill-Brown vs B4-Prudhome-Smith
  140          1.50   1.50  3♠ S      B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B6-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
         50    0.00   3.00  4♠ S -1   B7-Cooke-Mattox vs B2-Edgar-Bernbaum
17 ♠K3
KQ8
AKJ3
♣K764
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠Q4
542
T954
♣QJ98
♠J7652
JT763
82
♣T
♠AT98
A9
Q76
♣A532
19
52
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 6 4 5♠ 6NT
EW:  ♣2 ♦1 ♥3 ♠2 NT1
LoTT: 14 - 16 = -2
Par: +990 6NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  460          2.00   1.00  3N N +2   B1-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B5-Welter-Budd
  460          2.00   1.00  3N N +2   B3-Kaufman-Arneill-Brown vs B4-Prudhome-Smith
  460          2.00   1.00  3N N +2   B7-Cooke-Mattox vs B2-Edgar-Bernbaum
  400          0.00   3.00  5♣ N      B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B6-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
18 ♠K7
JT542
AT6
♣J74
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠AJ62
97
KQ754
♣T8
♠Q4
KQ63
J982
♣965
♠T9853
A8
3
♣AKQ32
9
108
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 2 3♠ 2NT  ♦5
EW: 2  ♣3 ♥5 ♠4 NT5
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  150          3.00   0.00  2N N +1   B1-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B5-Welter-Budd
   90          2.00   1.00  2♣ S      B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B6-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
        100    1.00   2.00  3 N -1   B7-Cooke-Mattox vs B2-Edgar-Bernbaum
        200    0.00   3.00  3♠ S -2   B3-Kaufman-Arneill-Brown vs B4-Prudhome-Smith
19 ♠QJT6
AK7
J8764
♣6
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠K872
5
KQ9
♣Q9432
♠543
QJ3
A32
♣AKT5
♠A9
T98642
T5
♣J87
11
1014
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣3 ♦6 ♠4 NT4
EW: 4♣ 3♠ 3NT  ♦6 ♥5
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: -500 4*-NS-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
         50    3.00   0.00  2 N -1   B4-Prudhome-Smith vs B5-Welter-Budd
        110    1.50   1.50  1♠ W +1   B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B7-Cooke-Mattox
        110    1.50   1.50  2♣ E +1   B1-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B3-Kaufman-Arneill-Brown
        150    0.00   3.00  1N E +2   B2-Edgar-Bernbaum vs B6-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
20 ♠K9873
87
QT6
♣K43
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠T
T5432
AJ4
♣QJT6
♠54
AKJ96
982
♣A95
♠AQJ62
Q
K753
♣872
8
812
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 2♠  ♣3 ♥2 NT3
EW: 4♣ 5 2NT  ♦5 ♠5
LoTT: 19 - 20 = -1
Par: -650 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  170          3.00   0.00  3♠ S +1   B4-Prudhome-Smith vs B5-Welter-Budd
        100    1.50   1.50  4♠ S -1   B1-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B3-Kaufman-Arneill-Brown
        100    1.50   1.50  4♠ S -1   B2-Edgar-Bernbaum vs B6-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth
        620    0.00   3.00  4 E      B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B7-Cooke-Mattox
21 ♠AQ865
A92
83
♣AK5
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠K432
KQT73
T
♣QT3
♠97
85
J9742
♣8764
♠JT
J64
AKQ65
♣J92
17
101
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 4 3 4/5♠ 4/5NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠2 NT2
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: +660 5NT-N
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
 1190          3.00   0.00  4♠* N +2  B1-Fickerson-Fickerson vs B3-Kaufman-Arneill-Brown
  660          2.00   1.00  3N N +2   B8-Johnson-Johnson vs B7-Cooke-Mattox
  630          1.00   2.00  3N N +1   B4-Prudhome-Smith vs B5-Welter-Budd
  620          0.00   3.00  4♠ N      B2-Edgar-Bernbaum vs B6-Marquez-Olson-Forsyth