- Thursday Aft - October 3, 2019

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Field strength:  Mean: 82 MP  Geomean: 45 MP
(based on 12 players)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Ben Wada - Saurin Chakrabarti 62.50 1st OA 1.10
Jeff Steward - Ray Escobedo 52.50 2nd OA 0.83
Linda Forsyth - Robert Carrier 51.25 1st SB 0.53
Katarina Bernbaum - Miki Thompson 46.25 2nd SB 0.37
EVENT>Ven Th Aft 299er Prs-RmG |SESSION>Thursday Aft |SECTION> B
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>October 3, 2019    |CLUB NO.>131102    | 10/03/2019 15:38
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Bob Gruber      |RATING>Club Appreciation game       |MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   20.0 |TOP>   2 |MP LIMITS>300/125/75     |CLUB>Ventura Unit
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=6/B=4/C=2                       ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |      Overall    |           Section       |      |Final    |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Allen Dahl             Iris Acutt               B   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     18.00  45.00
 2 Doug Hahn              Colleen Conway           B   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     17.00  42.50
 3 Katarina Bernbaum      Miki Thompson            C   .     .     .   |   .     2     .     18.50  46.25  0.37(SB)
 4 Jeff Steward           Ray Escobedo             A   2     .     .   |   2     .     .     21.00  52.50  0.83(OA)
 5 Saurin Chakrabarti     Ben Wada                 A   1     .     .   |   1     .     .     25.00  62.50  1.10(OA)
 6 Robert Carrier         Linda Forsyth            C   .     .     .   |   .     1     .     20.50  51.25  0.53(SB)
                                          Totals                                            120.00

Hands and Results
1 ♠A4
J4
J53
♣AT8654
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠KQJ732
2
Q72
♣KQ3
♠65
K9765
AK8
♣J92
♠T98
AQT83
T964
♣7
10
1311
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣6 ♦6 ♠4 NT5
EW: 2♠ 2NT  ♣6 ♦6 ♥6
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
   50          2.00   0.00  4♠ W -1   B3-Bernbaum-Thompson vs B5-Chakrabarti-Wada
        110    1.00   1.00  2♠ W      B6-Carrier-Forsyth vs B1-Dahl-Acutt
        140    0.00   2.00  2♠ W +1   B2-Hahn-Conway vs B4-Steward-Escobedo

Michael Berkowitz Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 11Pass
1PassPassPass

Ugh. I don't know about this deal. I think I'd open the North hand 1, but the jacks aren't great. If North passes, I don't know if East opens, but that's possible. South is hoping to defend against hearts, but West will always bid some number of spades. On the auction shown, East is a little stuck for a second bid and might choose to let 1 go (if it is NF) or maybe bid 1NT. That won't please South, but neither would putting down a dummy in 2 (if North made the mistake of bidding again). If West gets a second chance, she'll probably bid more spades, but how many?

Against some number of spades, North is going to be unhappy on opening lead. Diamonds are the unbid suit, and that lead is probably the safest. Declarer will be optimistic about any spade contract. She has only one loser in spades, one in diamonds and one in clubs. She'll win the first trick in dummy and lead a spade to the J. North wins and should know that a diamond continuation won't work (from partner's trick 1 signal). If North finds a heart (or the A) then the defenders should find their way to a club ruff. If North exits with another diamond, declarer will take 10 tricks. South would really like to lead out of turn on this deal.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at michael@larryco.com

2 ♠KJ6
KJ53
AK73
♣J6
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠8
A4
QT9865
♣KQ84
♠T5432
987
2
♣A532
♠AQ97
QT62
J4
♣T97
16
114
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 1/2♠ 2NT  ♣3 ♦4
EW: 3♣ 2  ♥3 ♠5 NT5
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: +100 4♣*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  620          2.00   0.00  4 N      B2-Hahn-Conway vs B4-Steward-Escobedo
  150          1.00   1.00  1N N +2   B6-Carrier-Forsyth vs B1-Dahl-Acutt
         90    0.00   2.00  2 W      B3-Bernbaum-Thompson vs B5-Chakrabarti-Wada

Michael Berkowitz Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  PassPass
22NTPass3
Pass3Pass4
All pass   

After two passes, West has options in third seat. In first or second seat, this would be a normal 1 opening, but here it pays to put a little pressure on your vulnerable opponents. Third seat preempts can be wide-ranging since you know that partner doesn't have a big hand and here, the only way you'll find a game is if partner has a big fit with you. North overcalls 2NT showing an opening notrump and South uses Stayman . When North bids 3 South doesn't have room to invite so just has to guess whether to bid game. Since partner could have a little extra (with 18 or even 19 balanced, you might feel stuck bidding 2NT), South should probably just bid game.

This is another good game that will go down on a ruff. West should be able to tell that the 2 is a singleton on this auction. Declarer will win the first trick (playing low from dummy) and now play a heart. West wins and will give partner a ruff. Should West try to signal suit-preference with her lowest diamond or play the Q to smother the J? Leading low might seem dangerous if East doesn't have the A as now declarer has an extra diamond winner but can only pitch one club from dummy. East can ruff the diamond and has to guess the suit to return. If partner signals for clubs, this play is simpler.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at michael@larryco.com

3 ♠753
J7642
AT876
♣-
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠K8642
K8
KJ4
♣Q54
♠QJT
AQT
53
♣AK963
♠A9
953
Q92
♣JT872
5
1216
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 1/-  ♣4 ♥7/6 ♠3 NT2
EW: 3♣ 3/4♠ 2NT  ♦6 ♥6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -620 4♠-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  100          2.00   0.00  3N W -1   B2-Hahn-Conway vs B4-Steward-Escobedo
        650    0.50   1.50  4♠ W +1   B3-Bernbaum-Thompson vs B5-Chakrabarti-Wada
        650    0.50   1.50  4♠ W +1   B6-Carrier-Forsyth vs B1-Dahl-Acutt

Michael Berkowitz Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   Pass
123Pass
3Pass4All pass
 

South passes and West opens the bidding with 1 on an ugly 12-count and North might choose to get involved with the Michaels cuebid shown at these colors in spite of the ugly heart suit. East needs to show a very good hand, and the way to do that is to cuebid the known suit--hearts. This promises a limit-raise or better. West signs off in 3 and East should respect that West is not interested in anything more and bid only 4. Control bidding 4 on the way would be fine, but West will try to end the auction at every opportunity.

North leads a heart, probably, and declarer can win in either hand. counting losers , it looks like declarer is off just two aces and potentially another trick or two in diamonds. Declarer's plan should be to draw trump and eventually pitch diamonds on hearts or clubs. Declarer knows that splits are likely to be bad, but there's not much she can do about that. She should win the first trick in her hand with the K (to keep entries to dummy's clubs) and play a spade. South wins and needs to do some counting. She knows partner has five hearts and five diamonds and at least one spade. She also knows that if partner only has 1 spade, that means declarer started with 7 spades and didn't want to be in game opposite a limit-raise (unlikely) so partner has at least two spades and at most one club. If you have a partner who leads from Jxxxx against a suit contract instead of leading a singleton, you should get a new partner. Eureka! Partner must have a club void. South should lead back the 2 to suggest a card in diamonds. This thoughtful play will hold declarer to 10 tricks.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at michael@larryco.com

4 ♠98
QJT4
Q87
♣KJ75
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠KT6532
-
AJ32
♣AT6
♠J74
A632
KT95
♣82
♠AQ
K9875
64
♣Q943
9
128
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: -/1♣ 1  ♣6/7 ♦1 ♠2 NT2
EW: 5 5♠ 2NT  ♣6 ♥5
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -650 5♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        140    2.00   0.00  2♠ W +1   B6-Carrier-Forsyth vs B1-Dahl-Acutt
        170    1.00   1.00  2♠ W +2   B2-Hahn-Conway vs B4-Steward-Escobedo
        200    0.00   2.00  2♠ W +3   B3-Bernbaum-Thompson vs B5-Chakrabarti-Wada

Michael Berkowitz Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
1Pass2Pass
3Pass4All pass

West opens 1, East raises to 2 and, after South passes (don't get involved on the 3-level vulnerable with a balanced 11 count, please), West needs to decide between a game-try and simply bidding 4. Either way could be right, but even with West making a game try in diamonds, East should accept to get the pair to 4.

North leads the Q against 4 and declarer will have to consider what to do. With limited entries, it seems right to win this in dummy (pitching a club) and lead a low spade towards hand. South plays the A and has nothing good to do. A club seems like a good idea (it's usually okay to play the suit declarer has pitched) and declarer wins and can either try the K (playing for a 2-2 split) or cross to dummy to play a spade towards hand. Both ways work, but using up dummy's entry is a risk as you give up the way to guess diamonds. I'd cash the K as it will give you information at least for your diamond guess (if they were 3-1, I'd likely finesse the hand with only one spade for the Q). When both opponents follow, declarer can play another spade, ruff a heart, play some more trump until declarer only has 2 trump left and then try exiting a club. The goal isn't to effect some kind of squeeze, but to get a rough count of the hand and see if anyone pitches diamonds.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at michael@larryco.com

5 ♠J932
A6
KQ
♣KT632
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠A874
T952
J973
♣J
♠Q65
Q74
AT62
♣Q97
♠KT
KJ83
854
♣A854
13
610
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 1 2 2♠ 2NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +130 4♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  120          2.00   0.00  1N S +1   B3-Bernbaum-Thompson vs B4-Steward-Escobedo
        100    1.00   1.00  2♠ N -1   B6-Carrier-Forsyth vs B2-Hahn-Conway
        200    0.00   2.00  3N N -2   B5-Chakrabarti-Wada vs B1-Dahl-Acutt

Michael Berkowitz Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 1Pass1
Pass1Pass3
All pass   

North opens 1 and South responds 1, the opponents dutifully passing throughout (the best kind of opponents). North now rebids 1 and South is stuck between inviting with 2NT or trying 3. Your choice might depend on your partnership style. Some play that 1 promises an unbalanced hand, while others would bid 1 with any hand featuring four spades. With three suits bid, it frightens me a little to bid notrump without a stopper in the unbid suit so I chose 3. North doesn't have anything extra, so whichever bid South makes will end the auction.

The East hand is a nightmare for anyone who doesn't like to lead away from honors. I'd probably lead either a heart or the A as the unbid suit. Declarer can guess well to make 130 (3 +1) by playing a spade to the 10. There are a few good reasons to guess this correctly: it plays for the aces to be split, it makes life easier for a ruffing finesse later on, you might be able to count out six points already in the East hand, etc. This will outscore those who play in notrump held to 120 on a diamond lead. Note that the proper play in clubs is to start with the A since you can pick up honor-9-7 in West, but not in East and it's also superior against a 4-0 split. The actual holding on this deal can't be picked up for no losers.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at michael@larryco.com

6 ♠J7
K2
98542
♣QJ63
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠865
AJ94
A
♣AK842
♠QT92
QT73
QJT3
♣9
♠AK43
865
K76
♣T75
7
167
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣5 ♥3 ♠4 NT5
EW: 2♣ 4 3♠ 2NT  ♦6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -620 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  100          2.00   0.00  4 E -1   B3-Bernbaum-Thompson vs B4-Steward-Escobedo
        110    1.00   1.00  2 W      B6-Carrier-Forsyth vs B2-Hahn-Conway
        620    0.00   2.00  4 E      B5-Chakrabarti-Wada vs B1-Dahl-Acutt
7 ♠AQ76
963
6
♣AK872
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠T5
QJ
KJ832
♣Q954
♠KJ94
AKT7
T9
♣T63
♠832
8542
AQ754
♣J
13
911
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT4
EW: 1♣ 1 3NT  ♥6 ♠6
LoTT: 13 - 14 = -1
Par: -600 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  100          2.00   0.00  2 W -1   B5-Chakrabarti-Wada vs B1-Dahl-Acutt
        100    1.00   1.00  2♣ N -1   B6-Carrier-Forsyth vs B2-Hahn-Conway
        300    0.00   2.00  1N S -3   B3-Bernbaum-Thompson vs B4-Steward-Escobedo
8 ♠9743
96432
KJ5
♣2
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠AQ865
KJ
A6
♣7654
♠KT2
T87
T93
♣KQT9
♠J
AQ5
Q8742
♣AJ83
4
148
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 2  ♣5 ♠4 NT5
EW: 2♣ 2♠ 1NT  ♦5 ♥5
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -100 3*-NS/3*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
   50          2.00   0.00  3♠ W -1   B6-Carrier-Forsyth vs B2-Hahn-Conway
        110    1.00   1.00  2♠ W      B3-Bernbaum-Thompson vs B4-Steward-Escobedo
        140    0.00   2.00  2♠ W +1   B5-Chakrabarti-Wada vs B1-Dahl-Acutt
9 ♠3
KT32
Q84
♣J8532
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠AKJ4
AQ
73
♣AKT96
♠T972
J95
AJT5
♣Q7
♠Q865
8764
K962
♣4
6
218
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦3 ♥5 ♠2 NT2
EW: 5♣ 3 2 5♠ 5NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -660 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        600    2.00   0.00  3N W      B6-Carrier-Forsyth vs B3-Bernbaum-Thompson
        620    1.00   1.00  4♠ E      B1-Dahl-Acutt vs B2-Hahn-Conway
        660    0.00   2.00  3N W +2   B4-Steward-Escobedo vs B5-Chakrabarti-Wada
10 ♠T3
KQ83
T762
♣954
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠65
A42
AKJ83
♣JT6
♠KQ9742
965
Q4
♣Q7
♠AJ8
JT7
95
♣AK832
5
139
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1  ♦5 ♠5 NT6
EW: 2 1♠ 1NT  ♣5 ♥6
LoTT: 14 - 16 = -2
Par: -90 1NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  200          2.00   0.00  3♠ E -2   B6-Carrier-Forsyth vs B3-Bernbaum-Thompson
  100          1.00   1.00  3 W -1   B4-Steward-Escobedo vs B5-Chakrabarti-Wada
        110    0.00   2.00  3 W      B1-Dahl-Acutt vs B2-Hahn-Conway
11 ♠AJ953
A43
QT82
♣4
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠KT74
Q852
76
♣963
♠Q2
T976
AJ5
♣KJ75
♠86
KJ
K943
♣AQT82
11
511
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 5 1 4♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦2 ♥5 ♠3 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +420 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  430          2.00   0.00  3N S +1   B6-Carrier-Forsyth vs B3-Bernbaum-Thompson
  400          1.00   1.00  3N S      B4-Steward-Escobedo vs B5-Chakrabarti-Wada
  110          0.00   2.00  3 S      B1-Dahl-Acutt vs B2-Hahn-Conway
12 ♠J3
KQJ
KQ762
♣A83
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠K72
T952
T
♣KQ964
♠A84
8764
543
♣JT2
♠QT965
A3
AJ98
♣75
16
85
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5 4♠ 3NT  ♣6 ♥6
EW: 1♣  ♦2 ♥6 ♠3 NT4
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +620 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  630          2.00   0.00  3N N +1   B1-Dahl-Acutt vs B2-Hahn-Conway
  600          0.50   1.50  3N N      B4-Steward-Escobedo vs B5-Chakrabarti-Wada
  600          0.50   1.50  3N N      B6-Carrier-Forsyth vs B3-Bernbaum-Thompson
13 ♠KJ9
965432
KT9
♣3
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠AT54
AK7
A852
♣74
♠862
J
J3
♣AKQT985
♠Q73
QT8
Q764
♣J62
7
1511
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣2/1 ♦5/4 ♠3 NT2
EW: 5♣ 2 4♠ 5NT  ♥5
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: -660 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        660    1.00   1.00  3N W +2   B1-Dahl-Acutt vs B3-Bernbaum-Thompson
        660    1.00   1.00  3N W +2   B5-Chakrabarti-Wada vs B2-Hahn-Conway
        660    1.00   1.00  3N W +2   B6-Carrier-Forsyth vs B4-Steward-Escobedo
14 ♠JT984
K4
432
♣864
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠AK32
96
AKJ75
♣AJ
♠Q75
Q8532
96
♣T75
♠6
AJT7
QT8
♣KQ932
4
204
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT4
EW: 3 2 2♠ 3NT  ♣6
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: -400 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  500          2.00   0.00  6* E -3  B5-Chakrabarti-Wada vs B2-Hahn-Conway
        110    1.00   1.00  1♠ W +1   B1-Dahl-Acutt vs B3-Bernbaum-Thompson
        400    0.00   2.00  3N W      B6-Carrier-Forsyth vs B4-Steward-Escobedo
15 ♠Q5
T2
K65
♣AQJ863
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠KJ9632
A43
A7
♣K2
♠AT7
75
Q9832
♣754
♠84
KQJ986
JT4
♣T9
12
156
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2  ♦4 ♠2 NT4
EW: 2 3♠ 1/2NT  ♣5 ♥5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
   50          2.00   0.00  3♠ W -1   B5-Chakrabarti-Wada vs B2-Hahn-Conway
        110    1.00   1.00  2♠ W      B1-Dahl-Acutt vs B3-Bernbaum-Thompson
        420    0.00   2.00  4♠ W      B6-Carrier-Forsyth vs B4-Steward-Escobedo
16 ♠Q876
Q9732
2
♣AJ8
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠J32
AT854
A94
♣94
♠K5
J6
KT653
♣KQT6
♠AT94
K
QJ87
♣7532
9
912
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♠  ♣5 ♦5/4 ♥6 NT5
EW: 1♣ 2 1 1NT  ♠5
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +110 2♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  100          2.00   0.00  2N E -1   B5-Chakrabarti-Wada vs B2-Hahn-Conway
        150    0.50   1.50  1N E +2   B1-Dahl-Acutt vs B3-Bernbaum-Thompson
        150    0.50   1.50  1N E +2   B6-Carrier-Forsyth vs B4-Steward-Escobedo
17 ♠AKQJ92
QT
A8
♣AJ8
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠8753
5
JT9
♣QT975
♠4
A87432
K53
♣643
♠T6
KJ96
Q7642
♣K2
21
37
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 4 3 5♠ 6/5NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 ♠1 NT1
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: +990 6NT-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  980          2.00   0.00  6♠ N      B4-Steward-Escobedo vs B1-Dahl-Acutt
  480          1.00   1.00  4♠ N +2   B2-Hahn-Conway vs B3-Bernbaum-Thompson
        150    0.00   2.00  5 N -3   B6-Carrier-Forsyth vs B5-Chakrabarti-Wada
18 ♠974
65
AQJ86
♣QT8
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠AQJ63
QJ93
K
♣A93
♠T2
KT8
7532
♣KJ72
♠K85
A742
T94
♣654
9
177
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 ♠1 NT4
EW: 5♣ 1 5 5♠ 1NT
LoTT: 17 - 15 = +2
Par: -450 5♠-EW/5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        170    1.50   0.50  3♠ W +1   B6-Carrier-Forsyth vs B5-Chakrabarti-Wada
        170    1.50   0.50  2 W +2   B4-Steward-Escobedo vs B1-Dahl-Acutt
        300    0.00   2.00  3 N -3   B2-Hahn-Conway vs B3-Bernbaum-Thompson
19 ♠J87
AT9
Q82
♣AT65
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠AK93
J87642
T
♣QJ
♠Q2
KQ
AKJ754
♣984
♠T654
53
963
♣K732
11
1115
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦3 ♥2/1 ♠5/4 NT4
EW: 1♣ 3 4 2♠ 2NT
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -620 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        110    2.00   0.00  2 W      B2-Hahn-Conway vs B3-Bernbaum-Thompson
        620    0.50   1.50  4 W      B4-Steward-Escobedo vs B1-Dahl-Acutt
        620    0.50   1.50  4 W      B6-Carrier-Forsyth vs B5-Chakrabarti-Wada
20 ♠KQT9
982
643
♣K73
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠AJ7
64
K8
♣QJT842
♠53
AKJ7
AQJT92
♣5
♠8642
QT53
75
♣A96
8
1115
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦2 ♥4 ♠5 NT4
EW: 3♣ 4 2 1♠ 3NT
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -600 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        150    2.00   0.00  2 E +3   B4-Steward-Escobedo vs B1-Dahl-Acutt
        630    1.00   1.00  3N W +1   B6-Carrier-Forsyth vs B5-Chakrabarti-Wada
        660    0.00   2.00  3N W +2   B2-Hahn-Conway vs B3-Bernbaum-Thompson