- Wednesday Aft - November 27, 2019

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Field strength:  Mean: 21 MP  Geomean: 18 MP
(based on 8 players, 4 non ACBL players ignored)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Kay Mendel - Linda Forsyth 61.25 1st OA 0.66
Katarina Bernbaum - Miki Thompson 55.00 2nd OA 0.50
EVENT>49er Pairs               |SESSION>Wednesday Aft|SECTION> B
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>November 27, 2019  |CLUB NO.>131102    | 11/27/2019 15:34
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Rose Buckley    |RATING>Club Championship (60%, 40%, 30% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   20.0 |TOP>   2 |MP LIMITS>50/10/5        |CLUB>Ventura Unit Bridge Club
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=6/B=2/C=2                       ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |      Overall    |           Section       |      |Final    |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Robert Carrier         Owen Smith               A   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     19.00  47.50
 2 Linda Forsyth          Kay Mendel               A   1     .     .   |   1     .     .     24.50  61.25  0.66(OA)
 3 Marianne Prudhome      Ruff Smith               C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     18.50  46.25
 4 Katarina Bernbaum      Miki Thompson            A   2     .     .   |   2     .     .     22.00  55.00  0.50(OA)
 5 Ken Richardson         Patty Richardson         A   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     18.50  46.25
 6 Dana Johnson           Chris Johnson            C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     17.50  43.75
                                          Totals                                            120.00

Hands and Results
1 ♠Q872
KJT7
QJ762
♣-
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠-
AQ654
K943
♣QJT8
♠AJ654
9
A
♣AK5432
♠KT93
832
T85
♣976
9
1216
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣0 ♦6 ♥3 ♠4/5 NT3
EW: 7♣ 1 3 2♠ 4NT
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: -1440 7♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        150    2.00   0.00  4♣ E +1   B2-Forsyth-Mendel vs B4-Bernbaum-Thompson
        170    1.00   1.00  3♣ E +3   B3-Prudhome-Smith vs B5-Richardson-Richardson
        460    0.00   2.00  3N E +2   B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B1-Carrier-Smith

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 Pass1Pass
1Pass1Pass
21Pass2Pass
3Pass3Pass
3Pass42Pass
43Pass44Pass
55Pass56Pass
67All pass  
  1. 4th suit game forcing
  2. Asking about keycards
  3. 1 or 4 keycards
  4. Queen of trump?
  5. Yes and the K
  6. Anything else?
  7. I know you're looking for help and I'm not sure if a void is good or not

Ok, yes, I know, it's a long, complicated, expert only bidding sequence, but you have to indulge your analyst sometimes when he likes to get into some bidding theory. Although I think an expert partnership might sniff at a grand slam on this hand, such as on the bidding shown, the reality is that just getting to a small slam will be a challenge for most pairs, and 6 will be a well above average contract for those who bid it. In fact, if you don't have the tools to find a minor suit slam, it is often better to play in 3NT, as it will score better on many hands than a minor suit game. On the actual hand, as declarer has good chances to make all 13 tricks with careful play in s, a 5 contract may work out well, as there are only 10 tricks available in a NT contract unless the defense errs.

After East opens 1 and West responds 1, East will have to decide whether to bid 1 or 2. With such good distribution, bidding a game forcing 2 isn't a bad choice on values, but it takes up a lot of space, and it will be hard for East to show their extra length without the bidding getting high. I wouldn't want to be at 3 without knowing what suit is going to be trump. I think this hand is easier to bid by rebidding 1, which is forcing for most partnerships, planning to bid 2 next, which is also basically forcing as long as West has a fit for one of East's suits. As it happens, if the E/W agreement is that a 1 rebid always promises at least five s (a common expert agreement), West will know they have a great hand for s and can force to game, but even if they don't know this, they might force game anyway. In the worst case scenario that West bids only 3 over 1, I think East will still be able to drive to slam.

A contract can always make all 13 tricks as long as declarer gets three ruffs and pulls a round of trump with dummy's trumps, but declarer may have to guess at the end which red suit to ruff back to their hand. Declarer should always make 12 tricks, and the overtrick will only be important to pairs who are playing 5, as 6 will be a good score regardless of how many tricks are made.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

2 ♠T83
9
T62
♣AJT864
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠Q76
Q86542
Q98
♣9
♠K4
AKT3
A74
♣KQ32
♠AJ952
J7
KJ53
♣75
5
619
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♠  ♣6 ♦6 ♥2 NT3
EW: 1♣ 1 5/4 4/3NT  ♠6
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -450 5-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        200    2.00   0.00  3 W +2   B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B1-Carrier-Smith
        420    1.00   1.00  4 E      B3-Prudhome-Smith vs B5-Richardson-Richardson
        450    0.00   2.00  4 W +1   B2-Forsyth-Mendel vs B4-Bernbaum-Thompson

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  11
Dbl24All pass

Not everyone will overcall 1 with the South hand, holding a "Swiss cheese" suit, at unfavorable vulnerability, but E/W should be able to get to their game even in the face of N/S interference. If South doesn't bid at all, E/W will have no difficulties bidding 4, but if South bids 1, West can start with a double. As responder, doubling and then bidding a suit shows a long suit with a hand too weak to bid a new suit at the two level initially, which typically promises 10+ HCP. Note that this is the opposite of doubling when the opponents when your partner hasn't bid and then bidding a new suit next, which shows a strong hand. The key to remember is that when your partner has opened and the opponents have overcalled at the one level, then doubling and later bidding a new suit underneath the opponents suit shows a weak hand. West is planning to bid s at their next chance, but East will preempt that by showing up with a full four card fit and a good hand, jumping to 4 at their next chance to bid.

South has no good lead against 4. A lead will let declarer play the Queen and later pitch a on a high . On any other lead, declarer can win, pull trump and lead a towards the KQ. If North ducks, the defense won't get a trick and declarer can lead towards the Queen later. If North goes up with the Ace, it's no better, as declarer will now have two winners to pitch the losers in the West hand, and the defense won't score a trick. For those who care, this is known as a "Morton's Fork Coup". If West is declarer in a contract North will have to lead a on opening lead, otherwise the same analysis applies. +450 will certainly be the most common score by far for E/W.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

3 ♠6
T43
JT8753
♣AJT
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠QJ742
52
AK6
♣Q86
♠AKT9
QJ97
Q4
♣K43
♠853
AK86
92
♣9752
6
1215
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣6 ♥5 ♠3 NT4
EW: 1♣ 1/2 4♠ 3NT  ♦6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -620 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        620    1.00   1.00  4♠ W      B2-Forsyth-Mendel vs B4-Bernbaum-Thompson
        620    1.00   1.00  4♠ W      B3-Prudhome-Smith vs B5-Richardson-Richardson
        620    1.00   1.00  4♠ W      B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B1-Carrier-Smith

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   Pass
1Pass2NT1Pass
42All pass  
  1. Four card support, game forcing
  2. Minimum

E/W should have not problems getting to 4 on this hand, and it's hard to see how declarer will make anything other than 10 tricks. After West opens 1, most E/W pairs will be playing the "Jacoby 2NT" convention to show a four card game forcing raise by East. Whatever the E/W agreements, after East forces to game, West should show a minimum hand, and that should be enough for East to give up on slam. Any East player who gets pushy and decides to make one more for slam will be overbidding and will be punished severely for it, as there just isn't any reasonable way for West to make 11 tricks, and the vast majority of the field will be quietly going +620 with the E/W cards.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

4 ♠QT843
8
T764
♣KQT
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠975
KQ5
QJ3
♣9543
♠62
T976
A92
♣AJ82
♠AKJ
AJ432
K85
♣76
7
89
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 1 4♠ 2NT  ♣6
EW:  ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠3 NT5
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +620 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  300          2.00   0.00  2 E -3   B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B1-Carrier-Smith
  110          1.00   1.00  2♠ N      B2-Forsyth-Mendel vs B4-Bernbaum-Thompson
  100          0.00   2.00  1N W -1   B3-Prudhome-Smith vs B5-Richardson-Richardson

Kenny Horneman Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
PassPassPass1NT
Pass21Pass2
All pass   
  1. Transfer

With the suit perfect and a normal trump break, the N/S hands can make 10 tricks in s, but I don't expect many pairs to bid game and it isn't really a very good game to be in either. Assuming West leads a high , I expect South to win and then play on s to get a ruff before pulling trump. If South just pulls trump right away, then they are likely to lose two s, two s and might even get tapped out to lose another trick at the end. Assuming declarer gets their ruff, then they will be assured of nine tricks, and will make ten if they can score a long trick.

However, the hand can be much more interesting than this. A good case can be made for declarer to duck the opening lead. With a singleton in dummy, few defenders will assume declarer has the Ace when they duck the first trick, and declarer can even play the 4 to help make it look like East has encouraged the opening lead. If West continues s, declarer can now cash two s, pitching two s from dummy and no longer has to try to play for the suit to break 3-3. Careful play will now see declarer home with ten tricks, losing one trick in each side suit. Note that even if West is suspicious and switches to a , declarer will still make 10 tricks if they are careful. East can win and continue s. Declarer wins King, cashes the Ace pitching a and ruffs a . Noting the fall of the Q declarer can now lead a to the Ace and then the Jack. West has to ruff, and declarer overruffs, leads a to the King, pulling the last trump, and can now cash their long to pitch their last loser. A ruff completes this fine line of play, bringing home 10 tricks.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at krhorneman11@gmail.com

5 ♠T
J8743
A9863
♣97
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠6
AKT6
KQJ742
♣Q4
♠AKJ543
Q952
5
♣62
♠Q9872
-
T
♣AKJT853
5
1510
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 1NT  ♦5 ♥4 ♠6
EW: 1 3 1♠  ♣3 NT5
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -140 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  130          2.00   0.00  4♣ S      B3-Prudhome-Smith vs B4-Bernbaum-Thompson
  100          0.50   1.50  4 W -2   B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B2-Forsyth-Mendel
  100          0.50   1.50  4 E -2   B5-Richardson-Richardson vs B1-Carrier-Smith
6 ♠3
AKJ98
KQ8
♣K754
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠AT542
63
952
♣863
♠J986
Q7
AJT7
♣T92
♠KQ7
T542
643
♣AQJ
16
48
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 1 5 1♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣2 ♦5 ♥2 ♠6 NT3
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: +450 5-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  450          1.50   0.50  4 N +1   B3-Prudhome-Smith vs B4-Bernbaum-Thompson
  450          1.50   0.50  4 N +1   B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B2-Forsyth-Mendel
  430          0.00   2.00  3N S +1   B5-Richardson-Richardson vs B1-Carrier-Smith
7 ♠JT82
843
AQ8
♣QT5
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠AK96
QT6
32
♣AK94
♠Q74
A5
T976
♣8632
♠53
KJ972
KJ54
♣J7
9
166
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣4 ♦6 ♠5 NT6
EW: 3♣ 1 2♠ 1NT  ♥6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -110 2♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  200          2.00   0.00  4♣ W -2   B5-Richardson-Richardson vs B1-Carrier-Smith
        120    1.00   1.00  1N W +1   B3-Prudhome-Smith vs B4-Bernbaum-Thompson
        150    0.00   2.00  1N W +2   B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B2-Forsyth-Mendel
8 ♠953
AQJ
AKJ94
♣95
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠AKQJ842
8
-
♣AK864
♠T
432
Q8762
♣QJT2
♠76
KT9765
T53
♣73
15
175
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 2  ♣0 ♠1 NT1
EW: 6♣ 6♠  ♦5 ♥5 NT5
LoTT: 20 - 18 = +2
Par: -980 6♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        480    1.00   1.00  4♠ W +2   B3-Prudhome-Smith vs B4-Bernbaum-Thompson
        480    1.00   1.00  4♠ W +2   B5-Richardson-Richardson vs B1-Carrier-Smith
        480    1.00   1.00  4♠ W +2   B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B2-Forsyth-Mendel
9 ♠3
AKT6
T942
♣AQ83
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠J
QJ3
KQJ653
♣972
♠AKQ2
9874
87
♣K54
♠T987654
52
A
♣JT6
13
1012
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3/2♣ 1 2♠  ♦4 NT4
EW: 1  ♣4 ♥6 ♠5 NT6
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: +110 2♠-NS/3♣-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  300          2.00   0.00  2 E -3   B4-Bernbaum-Thompson vs B5-Richardson-Richardson
  140          1.00   1.00  2♠ S +1   B1-Carrier-Smith vs B2-Forsyth-Mendel
        150    0.00   2.00  2N N -3   B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B3-Prudhome-Smith
10 ♠QJ53
KQ42
A62
♣Q2
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠AK6
JT8
KJT5
♣T65
♠87
A953
Q8743
♣A7
♠T942
76
9
♣KJ9843
14
1210
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2♠  ♦3 ♥4/3 NT3
EW: 4 2 2NT  ♣5 ♠5
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -130 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        110    2.00   0.00  1 E +1   B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B3-Prudhome-Smith
        130    0.50   1.50  3 E +1   B1-Carrier-Smith vs B2-Forsyth-Mendel
        130    0.50   1.50  2 W +2   B4-Bernbaum-Thompson vs B5-Richardson-Richardson
11 ♠K8
AJ32
KJ73
♣A53
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠JT743
764
T84
♣98
♠AQ6
T
Q65
♣KQJ742
♠952
KQ985
A92
♣T6
16
114
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 4/3 3/2NT  ♣5/4 ♠5
EW: 2♣ 2♠  ♦3/4 ♥3 NT4
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +300 4♠*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  170          2.00   0.00  3 N +1   B4-Bernbaum-Thompson vs B5-Richardson-Richardson
  140          1.00   1.00  2 N +1   B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B3-Prudhome-Smith
  110          0.00   2.00  3 N      B1-Carrier-Smith vs B2-Forsyth-Mendel
12 ♠K863
A75
QT4
♣K82
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠AJ5
KQ432
K2
♣AJ4
♠92
JT6
J75
♣QT975
♠QT74
98
A9863
♣63
12
184
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 3♠  ♣4 ♥4 NT6
EW: 3♣ 3 1NT  ♦4 ♠4
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: +100 4*-EW/4♣*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        110    2.00   0.00  1 W +1   B4-Bernbaum-Thompson vs B5-Richardson-Richardson
        140    0.50   1.50  3 W      B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B3-Prudhome-Smith
        140    0.50   1.50  1 W +2   B1-Carrier-Smith vs B2-Forsyth-Mendel
13 ♠943
K94
9764
♣J63
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠AJ872
J82
-
♣KT984
♠KQT6
QT6
KT82
♣Q7
♠5
A753
AQJ53
♣A52
4
912
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣4 ♥6 ♠3 NT5
EW: 3♣ 1/- 4♠ 1/-NT
       ♦5/4 ♥7/6 NT7/6
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -620 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  200          2.00   0.00  4♠ W -2   B1-Carrier-Smith vs B3-Prudhome-Smith
  100          0.50   1.50  4♠ W -1   B5-Richardson-Richardson vs B2-Forsyth-Mendel
  100          0.50   1.50  4♠ W -1   B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B4-Bernbaum-Thompson
14 ♠Q6
T76
9632
♣KT76
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠T8753
A9
KQ854
♣J
♠J9
K42
JT7
♣AQ854
♠AK42
QJ853
A
♣932
5
1011
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣5 ♦3 ♠5 NT5
EW: 1♣ 3 2♠ 2NT  ♥5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -100 3*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  110          1.50   0.50  1 S +1   B1-Carrier-Smith vs B3-Prudhome-Smith
  110          1.50   0.50  1 S +1   B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B4-Bernbaum-Thompson
   50          0.00   2.00  2♠ W -1   B5-Richardson-Richardson vs B2-Forsyth-Mendel
15 ♠AQ92
AT9
AK98
♣43
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠T4
K84
Q765
♣AJT2
♠873
J7632
T3
♣Q65
♠KJ65
Q5
J42
♣K987
17
103
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 4 1 5♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 ♠2 NT3
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +650 5♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  630          2.00   0.00  3N N +1   B5-Richardson-Richardson vs B2-Forsyth-Mendel
  600          1.00   1.00  3N N      B1-Carrier-Smith vs B3-Prudhome-Smith
  210          0.00   2.00  1N N +4   B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B4-Bernbaum-Thompson
16 ♠K9
862
9752
♣A865
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠8753
T74
84
♣QT73
♠QT62
K95
AKQT
♣92
♠AJ4
AQJ3
J63
♣KJ4
7
214
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2 2 2NT  ♠6
EW:  ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT4
LoTT: 13 - 15 = -2
Par: +120 2NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  120          1.00   1.00  1N S +1   B1-Carrier-Smith vs B3-Prudhome-Smith
  120          1.00   1.00  1N S +1   B5-Richardson-Richardson vs B2-Forsyth-Mendel
  120          1.00   1.00  1N S +1   B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B4-Bernbaum-Thompson
17 ♠T87432
86
5
♣K982
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠9
AKT72
JT9
♣QT64
♠6
QJ93
AKQ63
♣J73
♠AKQJ5
54
8742
♣A5
3
1013
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♠  ♣5 ♦3 ♥2 NT3
EW: 2♣ 3 3  ♠3 NT5
LoTT: 19 - 20 = -1
Par: +300 5*-EW/5*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  420          2.00   0.00  4♠ S      B2-Forsyth-Mendel vs B3-Prudhome-Smith
        300    1.00   1.00  4♠* S -2  B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B5-Richardson-Richardson
        450    0.00   2.00  4 W +1   B4-Bernbaum-Thompson vs B1-Carrier-Smith
18 ♠Q6
Q
Q743
♣AT8743
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠A875
A863
865
♣J6
♠J93
JT942
AJ
♣Q95
♠KT42
K75
KT92
♣K2
10
99
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 4 1♠ 1NT  ♥6
EW: 1  ♣4 ♦3 ♠6 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +130 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
   50          2.00   0.00  1 E -1   B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B5-Richardson-Richardson
    PASS       1.00   1.00  Pass Out  B4-Bernbaum-Thompson vs B1-Carrier-Smith
        100    0.00   2.00  3 S -1   B2-Forsyth-Mendel vs B3-Prudhome-Smith
19 ♠AQ94
62
J43
♣K973
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠85
AQ854
AKQ97
♣6
♠K7632
T973
5
♣Q82
♠JT
KJ
T862
♣AJT54
10
155
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦3 ♥1 ♠4 NT5/6
EW: 3 5 3♠ 1NT  ♣6
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -650 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
        140    2.00   0.00  3 W      B4-Bernbaum-Thompson vs B1-Carrier-Smith
        200    1.00   1.00  1 W +4   B2-Forsyth-Mendel vs B3-Prudhome-Smith
        680    0.00   2.00  4 W +2   B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B5-Richardson-Richardson
20 ♠T53
QJT8
AK943
♣7
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠KJ87
K94
JT5
♣J65
♠AQ964
62
2
♣AK843
♠2
A753
Q876
♣QT92
10
913
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 3  ♣4 ♠3 NT6
EW: 3♣ 4♠ 1NT  ♦3 ♥4
LoTT: 20 - 18 = +2
Par: -200 5*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract
  300          2.00   0.00  4♠ E -3   B2-Forsyth-Mendel vs B3-Prudhome-Smith
        140    1.00   1.00  2♠ E +1   B4-Bernbaum-Thompson vs B1-Carrier-Smith
        620    0.00   2.00  4♠ E      B6-Johnson-Johnson vs B5-Richardson-Richardson